The prosecution investigating the December 3 martial law incident began a mandatory investigation into the armed Forces Counterintelligence Command and others on the 9th.
The Prosecution’s Emergency Martial Law Special Investigation Headquarters (Director Park Se-hyun, Chief of the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office) announced that it has been conducting search and seizure of the Armed Forces counterintelligence Command located in Gwacheon, Gyeonggi-do since this morning.It is reported that the prosecution is securing data related to martial law.
Rep. Choo Mi-ae of the Democratic Party of Korea claimed the day before that the Counterintelligence Command had prepared a document planning to prepare for the declaration of martial law under the direction of Commander Yeo Yeo-hyung last month. In addition, Hong Jang-won, first deputy director of the National Intelligence service, testified that President Yoon Seok-yeol ordered the arrest of major politicians, and that a female commander called out a list of arrestees and requested location tracking. Commander Yeo is President Yoon’s high school junior and is called ‘Chungam High school Line’.
Currently, the investigation into the martial law incident is being conducted together by the prosecution and police. Prosecutors urgently arrested former Minister of National Defense Kim Yong-hyun after investigating him early the previous day, and police searched and seized former Minister Kim’s official residence, office, and home in the morning of the same day.
trot >
Correspondent’s Column
cat eyes
Jo Hye-sun, Donga.com reporter [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
Hot news now
- great
- 0dog
- I’m sad
- 0
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
How can citizens effectively advocate for clarity and accountability during investigations of government actions?
Time.news Interview: Exploring the December 3 Martial Law Incident with Expert Dr.Han Sol
Editor (Time.news): Good morning, and welcome to time.news. Today,we’re diving deep into a significant event that has recently unfolded in South Korea—the December 3 martial law incident. with us is Dr. Han Sol, a political analyst and expert in national security issues in South korea.Thank you for joining us, Dr. Sol.
Dr.Han Sol: Good morning, and thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss this crucial topic.
Editor: Let’s get right into it. The prosecution has launched a mandatory examination into the Armed Forces Counterintelligence Command following claims of preparations for martial law. How serious is this investigation, and what do you think it signifies for South Korean democracy?
Dr. Han Sol: The initiation of this investigation is unprecedented and alarming.It indicates a deep concern about the integrity of our democratic processes. when state institutions, especially military intelligence, start contemplating actions like martial law, it challenges the very foundation of our democracy and raises questions about abuses of power.
Editor: Indeed. The implications seem far-reaching. We’ve seen reports suggesting that Rep. Choo Mi-ae claims there were documents prepared for declaring martial law. How credible do you find her accusations, and what impact could this have politically?
Dr. Han Sol: Rep. Choo Mi-ae’s claims, especially if substantiated with evidence, could have dramatic political ramifications. They not only point to potential overreach by military intelligence but also imply involvement from the highest echelons of government, particularly President Yoon Seok-yeol.If true, we could witness intensified political strife, including calls for accountability and possibly even impeachment discussions.
Editor: That would indeed be significant. Additionally, it was reported that Hong Jang-won, deputy director of the National Intelligence Service, testified regarding presidential orders related to the arrests of major politicians.How does this testimony fit into the larger picture of this investigation?
Dr. Han Sol: Hong Jang-won’s testimony adds another layer of complexity. If President Yoon is found to have ordered such actions, it can further erode public trust in the administration. The notion that intelligence officials are acting on direct political orders suggests not only a troubling intertwining of politics and security but also a potential violation of civil rights. The fallout from this could reshape the political landscape.
Editor: Absolutely. There’s also been a swift response from law enforcement, including the arrest of former Minister of National Defense Kim Yong-hyun. How does this rapid legal action reflect the urgency of the situation?
Dr. Han Sol: The quick arrest of former minister Kim signals that the investigation is being treated with significant urgency.This reflects a desire to assert accountability and transparency within the government. However, it also raises concerns about political motives—whether these actions are genuinely about justice or part of a larger political maneuvering within the ruling party.
editor: You bring up an important point about political motivations. As we navigate this situation, what do you believe should be the public’s role and response to these developments?
Dr.Han Sol: The public’s role is crucial. There needs to be a demand for transparency and accountability from both the government and the prosecution. Civil society must remain vigilant and actively engage in discussions about safeguarding democracy. This includes protests, demands for clear investigations, and ultimately, a push for reforms that prevent misuse of power in the future.
Editor: Dr. Han, your insights are invaluable, and this situation undoubtedly raises important questions for South Korea’s future. Thank you for joining us today and sharing your perspective on this critical issue.
Dr. Han Sol: Thank you for having me. It’s essential that we continue to discuss these issues for the betterment of our society.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. We’ll continue to follow this story closely and update you on any developments. Stay informed with Time.news.