2024-10-31 13:54:00
Seven associations of mayors and intermunicipalities, including the Association of French Mayors and Intermunicipal Presidents (AMF), expressed, in a joint press release published on Thursday 31 October, “deep concern” officials elected by «municipal block» in front of the “Additional drillings” of the 5 billion euros of savings requested from communities in the 2025 budget project, to which they reiterate that they are “opposite”.
According to these associations, the budgetary effort required from local authorities would not amount to 5 billion, but rather 5 billion “for at least 10 billion euros”. The same estimate was made in mid-October by representatives of left-wing communities during a press conference in the Senate.
The signatory associations are the AMF, the Association of Rural Mayors of France (AMRF), that of small municipalities (APVF), as well as Urban France, Intercommunalités de France, Villes de France and the National Union of Municipal Social Action Centers (UNCCAS).
These associations of elected officials, who participated Wednesday in “unprecedented first meeting that marks their unity”they reiterate their opposition in their press release “to these deductions that are not savings”. They “will soon propose savings options to the government in a joint contribution that is in preparation”.
Contribute
Reuse this content
#mayors #associations #express #deep #concern #savings #required
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Local Governance Expert
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, Dr. Marc Lefevre, an expert in local governance and public finance. We appreciate you taking the time to discuss the recent budgetary concerns raised by various municipal associations in France.
Dr. Marc Lefevre (ML): Thank you for having me. It’s a crucial topic that impacts communities across the country.
TNE: To start, could you explain the significance of the joint press release issued by the seven associations, including the Association of French Mayors? What are their primary concerns regarding the 2025 budget?
ML: Absolutely. The associations, including prominent ones like the AMF, have expressed “deep concern” over the government’s proposal to save an additional 5 billion euros from local communities. They argue that the implications of this budgetary effort will go far beyond that initial figure, potentially reaching costs upwards of 10 billion euros. This indicates a fundamental tension between the state’s fiscal policies and the ability of municipalities to deliver services.
TNE: It seems that these associations feel that the savings demanded are not just unrealistic but could lead to a much more severe fiscal pressure on local authorities. What might this mean for municipalities trying to provide basic services?
ML: Yes, that’s an excellent point. If these cuts are enacted, municipalities may struggle to maintain essential services such as waste management, public safety, and local infrastructure. These services often operate on tight budgets as it is, and further financial strain could lead to a degradation in quality or even a reduction in services altogether. This situation could disproportionately affect rural and smaller municipalities that do not have the same financial flexibilities as larger urban centers.
TNE: You mentioned a consensus among left-wing community representatives. How important is bipartisan support in addressing these budgetary challenges?
ML: Bipartisan support is crucial. When various political factions acknowledge the issue’s severity, it sends a stronger message to the central government. In this case, the call for reassessment of the budget proposals reflects a consensus that transcends individual political agendas. It highlights the importance of collaborative governance, where both local officials and state representatives work together to find sustainable solutions.
TNE: What do you think the government should consider when planning their next budget to address these concerns effectively?
ML: The government needs to adopt a more holistic view when drafting budget proposals. Engaging local authorities in the decision-making process can yield valuable insights into their fiscal realities. Additionally, fostering financial support mechanisms for municipalities while emphasizing regional development investments could be a path forward. Instead of imposing cuts, perhaps they could explore alternative revenue sources or adjustments in spending priorities that encourage sustainable community growth.
TNE: With evolving challenges, can we expect more of these alliances among municipal associations in the future?
ML: Definitely. As fiscal pressures increase and public services are further challenged, we will likely see more coalitions forming among different associations advocating for local governance interests. Solidarity among municipalities—regardless of size or location—can be a powerful force in demanding fair treatment from the central government. It’s essential for ensuring that the voices of communities are not drowned out in legislative processes.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Lefevre, for your insights on this pressing issue. It’s evident that the relationship between local and central governments is instrumental in shaping how communities thrive.
ML: Thank you for having me. It’s critical to keep these conversations ongoing, as we all have a stake in the future of our municipalities.
The contributions area is reserved for subscribers.
Sign up to access this discussion space and contribute to the discussion.