Pennsylvania Backs philadelphia in Lawsuit Over Removed Slavery Exhibit at President’s House
Table of Contents
Philadelphia’s fight to preserve its history has gained the backing of the state, as Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro filed a legal document Tuesday supporting the city’s lawsuit against the Trump management regarding the removal of a two-decade-old exhibit detailing the history of slavery at the President’s House on Independence Mall.
The controversy centers on an exhibit that for over twenty years examined the complex history of slavery at the site, wich once served as the residence and workplace of president George Washington during his time in Philadelphia. The exhibit was removed earlier this month by the National Park Service, sparking outrage and legal action.
City Cites Cooperative Agreement
The City of Philadelphia argues the removal directly violates a cooperative agreement established in 2006 with the federal government,outlining the management of Independence Mall. This agreement, according to the lawsuit, stipulated the preservation and interpretation of historical elements at the site, including acknowledging the difficult legacy of slavery.
Governor Shapiro forcefully condemned the removal, stating, “Donald Trump will take any opportunity to rewrite and whitewash our history – but he picked the wrong city and the wrong Commonwealth.” He continued, “In Pennsylvania, we learn from our history, even when it’s painful. We don’t erase it or pretend it didn’t happen. Because when we know where we’ve been, we can chart a better course for the future. Those displays aren’t just signs – they represent our shared history, and if we want to move forward as a nation, we have to be willing to tell the full story of where we came from.”
Trump administration Defends Removal with Executive Order
The Trump administration justified the exhibit’s removal by citing an executive order signed in March 2025. This order directed federal agencies to “take action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to ensure that all public monuments, memorials, statues, markers or similar properties within the Department’s jurisdiction do not contain descriptions, depictions or other content that inappropriately disparage Americans past or living.”
This directive has raised concerns about the potential for selective historical interpretation and the suppression of uncomfortable truths about the nation’s past. Several plaques and markers depicting slavery were removed from the President’s House in Independence Historical Park in Philadelphia, as reported by NBC10.
The legal battle underscores a growing national debate about how to confront and interpret the legacy of slavery in public spaces,and whether historical narratives should be curated to avoid perceived offence. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for the preservation of difficult histories and the role of government in shaping public understanding of the past.
Why: The exhibit detailing the history of slavery at the President’s House in Philadelphia was removed by the national Park Service.
Who: The city of philadelphia, backed by Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, is suing the Trump administration. The Trump administration defended the removal citing an executive order.
what: The lawsuit challenges the removal of a twenty-year-old exhibit that acknowledged the history of slavery at the President’s House,arguing it violates a 2006 cooperative agreement.
How did it end?: As of the article’s publication, the case is ongoing. The outcome will likely set a precedent for how difficult histories are preserved and interpreted in public spaces. The article does not state a final resolution.
