south Korean prosecutors have opened an investigation into President Yeon Suk-yul, the former Interior Minister and the former Defense Minister regarding their roles in trying to impose martial law, Yonhap News agency reported Thursday.
The dismissed South Korean Defense Minister apologized, on Wednesday, for raising public concern regarding President Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law, and consequently, Choi Byung-hyuk, a retired four-star general, was nominated to succeed Kim.
Citing unspecified threats, Yoon imposed martial law for about six hours before rescinding his decision after Parliament voted to oppose the move.
Yoon’s declaration of martial law late Tuesday was an attempt to ban political activity and impose censorship on the media in South Korea, which has the fourth largest economy in Asia and is a major ally of the United States.
Yoon told the nation in a televised address that martial law was necessary to defend South Korea from nuclear-armed North Korea and anti-state forces supporting Pyongyang and protect its free constitutional order, although he did not specify what the threats were.
Chaotic scenes followed, as soldiers climbed the Parliament building through shattered windows and military helicopters soared overhead. Parliament aides tried to push the soldiers away using fire extinguishers, and demonstrators clashed with the police outside.
But within hours of the announcement, Parliament, with 190 of its 300 members present, unanimously passed a motion to lift martial law, including all 18 members of yuen’s party present.The president then canceled the announcement.
Yesterday, Wednesday, 6 opposition parties submitted a memorandum to dismiss the president, accusing him of committing “serious violations of the constitution and the law.”
South Korean Yonhap News Agency reported on Thursday that Parliament will hold a session the day after tomorrow, Saturday, during which it will vote on a draft law to remove Yoon after his failed attempt to impose martial law in the country.
last updated: December 5, 2024 – 12:03
Suggest a correction
how could the recent political events affect South Korea’s democracy and civil liberties?
Interview with Dr. Kim Soo-hyun, Political Analyst on South Korea’s Martial Law Controversy
Time.news Editor (TNE): thank you for joining us, Dr. Kim. We’ve just witnessed an unprecedented political event in South Korea with President Yoon Suk-yeol‘s attempt too impose martial law. Can you provide some context around this situation?
Dr. Kim Soo-hyun (KSH): Thank you for having me.the recent events in South Korea are alarming and complex. President Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law, albeit for a brief six hours, reflects the volatility of the political landscape amid threats from North Korea. His justification centered around protecting South Korea’s constitutional order and national security, but the swift backlash reveals deep divisions in the political sphere.
TNE: Indeed, the swift parliamentary reaction was striking. What do you beleive triggered such a rapid response from Parliament?
KSH: Parliament’s unanimous decision to rescind martial law highlights the urgent concerns among lawmakers regarding the abuse of executive power. with 190 members present, including those from yoon’s party, the disapproval was loud and clear. It illustrates that many representatives are seriously worried about the implications of such a drastic move on democracy and civil liberties in South Korea.
TNE: There are reports of a memorandum submitted by six opposition parties requesting president Yoon’s dismissal. What are the implications of this for his presidency?
KSH: The memorandum signifies a critical point of contention. If Parliament votes favorably to remove Yoon, it would not only alter the leadership but set a precedent regarding checks and balances in South Korean politics. This could lead to greater scrutiny over the executive branch’s actions, particularly how they handle national security threats.
TNE: The former Defense Minister has apologized, stating he raised public concern. What does this imply about the leadership team under President Yoon?
KSH: The apology from the former Defense minister, coupled with his sudden dismissal, suggests a lack of cohesive strategy within Yoon’s administration. It points to potential disillusionment among military and political leaders concerning Yoon’s aggressive tactics. This could foster instability and reduce public confidence in the leadership, both domestically and internationally.
TNE: The situation has lead to chaotic scenes in the streets, with military engagement and public protests. How do these reactions reflect the general sentiment of the South korean populace?
KSH: The chaotic reactions—demonstrators clashing with police and soldiers invading Parliament—emphasize public outrage and fear over authoritarianism. Many South Koreans cherish their democratic values, and attempts to suppress political activity raise meaningful alarms. This situation could catalyze a renewed civil movement advocating for openness and accountability in governance.
TNE: Looking forward, what practical advice would you offer to readers who may want to stay informed about these unfolding events?
KSH: I recommend following reputable news sources that offer 24/7 coverage of the situation as it evolves. Engaging in discussions through social media platforms and forums can also provide various perspectives.additionally, voters should remain active in political discourse and advocate for their rights, as public engagement will be critical in shaping the future of South Korea’s democracy.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Kim. Your insights into this intricate situation are invaluable. We appreciate your time today.
KSH: It’s been my pleasure. Let’s hope for a peaceful resolution to this crisis.