2024-04-17 16:17:08
Wallanews’ military correspondent, Amir Bukhbut, revealed interesting details, indicating that the decision to strike could have been different if the chief of staff had correctly assessed the potential consequences.
WallaNews writes about this.
He said an anonymous security source stressed that General Halevi may not have considered the possibility of a strong Iranian retaliatory strike, despite his foresight that such a response would be likely. This underestimation, according to the source, could affect the decision-making procedure and the willingness to approve the operation.
IsraelInfo asked why it was the Chief of the General Staff and the IDF who had to assess the likely consequences, and not, for example, the Mossad or Foreign Ministry experts. This remains unclear because, as experts point out, the decision to undertake such an operation is usually made based on a complex analysis that includes various aspects such as the political situation, risk and potential consequences.
The lack of concrete answers to these questions highlights the need for more in-depth research and analysis.
Earlier, Kursor reported that Iran did not seek to harm Israel with its attack. According to the analyst, Iran was demonstrating its strength and ability to respond.
The analyst notes that Iran’s attack is not aimed at simply harming Israel, but rather at demonstrating its strength and ability to respond effectively.