The presidency of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN)headed by Norma Piña, rejected three appeals against the judicial reform, whose constitutional process only lacks its promulgation.
The district judge Monica Pereda asked the Supreme Court to exercise its power of attraction and make a pronouncement for the contempt of the Legislature (Chamber of Deputies, Senate and local congresses) to the definitive suspension issued by the Fifth Court of Morelos.
You might be interested in: PJ workers’ strike continues, says spokesperson
He pointed out that this ruling acts against judicial independence and the rule of law, which is why the intervention of the Court was requested to rule on the outrage in which the legislators incurred, since They were prevented from continuing with the process of the opinion of judicial reform, but the SCJN decided to reject the appeal.
In turn, Judge Jorge Arturo Acosta, as representative of the National Association of Magistrates and Judges, filed an impediment to prohibit the ministers Lenia Batres, Loretta Ortiz and Yasmin Esquivel discuss the issues of judicial reform.
The SCJN presidency ruled that “the impediment raised by the promoters cited in the section is rejected as clearly inadmissible.”
In turn, the staff of the Second Collegiate Court on Labor Matters He asked the Supreme Court to “take a position in favor of respecting the independence of the Judiciary and maintaining the current composition of federal judges.”
You might be interested in: Pure stories, criticism from the Opposition to the judicial reform: AMLO
Another of their requests is that “the necessary actions be taken to preserve the separation of powers established in Article 49 of the Constitution to ensure that the system of checks and balances between the Powers of the Union is not eliminated.”
They indicated that the ministers must exercise “concrete actions in defense of the autonomy and independence of the Judicial Branch based on the international treaties that allow it and They force him to analyze the constitutionality and conventionality of actions such as those that have been undertaken so far and which aim to implement judicial reform.”
The petitions were rejected by the Supreme Court, although there is an appeal that the Court admitted a week ago to rule on judicial reform, which was assigned to the report of Minister Lenia Batres.
MC
Related
2024-09-14 11:05:31