Sustainable banana at a fair price: distributors assume their responsibilities

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

At a time ⁢of trade negotiations to set the prices of bananas in European⁣ supermarkets in 2024, Latin American producers denounce the double talk⁢ of some distributors who refuse to pay more despite their declared support for⁤ sustainable production. An illustration of ​the challenges that ‌the entire sector must respond to and which concern bananas from Ecuador, ​Martinique and Ivory Coast.

In several European countries, on Friday 22 November,⁣ there will be a discussion about the banana prices that will come into force in 2025 in supermarkets. A particularly difficult annual stalemate, because it is the fruit that ‍is​ the loss leader in‍ large-scale retail trade,‌ the one that attracts ​consumers. Touching your label is almost taboo.

On the other⁣ hand, we ask more and more of the banana ⁤so that it reduces its ‌carbon footprint and uses fewer synthetic inputs. Environmental and social expectations have⁤ multiplied in the last ⁢fifteen years. “ Requirements that today are no longer truly optional”notes an expert ‌in the sector, but which are increasingly less compatible with‌ the prices offered to the manufacturer. This is exactly ⁣what the Latin American ‌countries that ‍represent around 60% of the market ​are reporting this week: Colombia, Costa ‌Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru and the Dominican Republic.

A shared responsibility

In a common textThe producers of the so-called dollar banana point the finger at retailers who impose obligations on ⁣suppliers without wanting to assume their share of responsibility. The big conversation about sustainability is really just “ empty statements”, they write. Above all, the German distributor ⁣Edeka is in the ‌spotlight, ⁤having clearly expressed its intention‌ to negotiate prices downwards.

According to industry experts, the debate is no longer whether action should be ⁣collective, but has become a necessity.⁤ In a press release this Thursday 21 November, the Interprofessional Association of Bananas (AIB) – ‌which​ represents, in France, all the links in the sector, from⁢ the producer to ‍the distributor through the wholesaler and the⁣ ripener – confirms the need for‌ a shared ‍responsibility: to the expectations in In terms of sustainability, increasingly significant ‍agricultural and logistical risks are⁢ added,‍ notes⁢ the AIB, risks​ that entail additional costs.

A picture that becomes rigid

For ⁤example, weather ⁤conditions affect banana production‍ in Africa and Latin America, but also the water level in the Panama Canal ⁣used to ship bananas from Ecuador, Europe’s main‌ supplier. Tensions over the Suez Canal are‍ weighing on global ‍container ‍availability, while the war in Ukraine⁣ has⁢ driven up prices of factors of‌ production, not all of which ​have‍ returned to pre-war prices.

These constraints are⁤ starting to “hurt”. » of the sector ⁤and are increasingly less bearable for‍ the producers ​of the 20‌ million bananas exported worldwide every year – a global production of 80‍ million.

What⁣ are the challenges faced by⁣ banana ‍producers in balancing sustainable practices and pricing pressures?

​ To support sustainable practices while‌ simultaneously resisting price⁣ increases for the bananas it ⁢purchases.

Interview ‌between Time.news ⁤Editor⁤ and Dr. Elena Vázquez, Banana Industry Expert

Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. ​Vázquez! Thank you for joining us​ today to ⁣discuss the pressing issues surrounding ‌banana trade negotiations in ‍Europe. The producers⁢ from Latin America have raised some ‌grave ​concerns. What’s ⁤your take on the situation?

Dr. Elena Vázquez: Thank you for having me! It’s indeed a critical moment for the banana industry. As the producers have⁣ pointed out, there is a troubling​ contradiction between what retailers claim to support—sustainable production ​practices—and the prices they are willing to pay ⁣for bananas.

Time.news Editor: Absolutely. The article mentioned that⁢ banana pricing discussions are ongoing ⁢for 2025, ​but there ⁤seems to be an⁣ almost taboo nature about changing the​ price of bananas ⁢in supermarkets. Can you expound on that?

Dr. Elena ⁣Vázquez: Of course! ‍Bananas are often used as loss leaders in supermarkets. This means they are sold at a low price to attract customers, making it a challenging‍ product for ​retailers to ⁢increase prices ⁢on without⁤ risking ⁣customer backlash. Yet, with increasing⁢ demands ⁣for sustainable practices, it’s⁣ becoming increasingly complicated to⁤ reconcile these competing interests. The pressure to reduce ​carbon footprints while keeping prices low is creating a perfect ​storm.

Time.news Editor: That brings us to the ‍claim made by producers ‍that discussions of sustainability have become “empty statements.” How do you interpret this sentiment?

Dr. Elena Vázquez: It’s a reflection of the reality ‍on the ⁢ground. Producers feel⁢ caught in a bind where they are asked to improve social and‌ environmental standards without receiving adequate compensation for these efforts. This situation is particularly infuriating for countries like Colombia, Ecuador, and Costa ⁢Rica, which represent⁣ a ⁣significant portion of the‌ banana⁤ market. They are ⁣being held to higher standards, yet ⁢their margins are being squeezed tighter.

Time.news ‍Editor: The article highlights that the⁤ German distributor ​Edeka is under ⁢particular scrutiny for this issue. ‌What role do ​retailers, particularly large ones,⁢ play in this ecosystem?

Dr.⁤ Elena Vázquez: Retailers are undeniably⁢ powerful players in the supply chain. They can exert​ pressure on prices and set the tone for what sustainability looks like in practise. When retailers publicly advocate for sustainability yet resist paying more for responsibly sourced products, it sends a mixed⁣ message to both consumers ⁢and producers. It’s essential for these large ⁣distributors to‌ recognize their ⁢shared responsibility⁤ in ‍the supply chain and ⁤understand that paying fair prices is crucial for sustainability.

Time.news Editor: So, what do you think⁣ the path forward looks like for producers and​ retailers in this context?

Dr. Elena Vázquez: It’s going to require⁤ open dialog‌ and collaboration. Retailers ‌need⁣ to ‌engage meaningfully with producers⁢ and share‍ the burden of sustainable practices. This might mean reevaluating ​pricing⁤ models ‌to reflect the true cost of sustainable farming. Both⁣ parties need ⁢to recognize that sustainability is‌ a shared journey—while consumers demand higher environmental standards, ⁤they⁤ also need to be ⁣willing to pay for it.

Time.news Editor: Thank you, ‌Dr. Vázquez, for your valuable insights. It’s clear that the conversation about banana pricing⁢ and sustainability is complex. We⁣ appreciate your perspective on such a⁢ timely issue.

Dr. Elena Vázquez: Thank you for highlighting this important ⁤issue. ⁣It’s crucial that we ​keep these conversations going if we hope⁣ to drive meaningful change in the⁣ industry.

You may also like

Leave a Comment