Melting Arctic glaciers are flushing ancient methane from subterranean shale beds into polar rivers on Svalbard, revealing a natural climate feedback loop. Researchers report that meltwater samples in nineteen waterways contain up to 425 times expected atmospheric methane levels, though total emissions remain a fraction of human-produced output.
Subterranean rock formations beneath Arctic ice are releasing ancient greenhouse gases as polar temperatures rise. While international climate discussions frequently center on industrial emissions and thawing permafrost, a team of researchers has documented an unexpected source of natural gas escaping directly from the bedrock beneath retreating glaciers.
Subglacial Sampling Across Svalbard Reveals High Methane Concentrations
Field researchers collected 148 water samples from 19 glacier-fed rivers across Svalbard, a remote Norwegian archipelago situated halfway between the mainland and the North Pole. Every single waterway tested showed methane levels significantly higher than what normal contact with the atmosphere would produce. The most contaminated rivers carried concentrations reaching 425 times expected baseline values.

The work was led by Gabrielle Kleber of the iC3 Polar Research Hub, a center located at UiT The Arctic University of Norway in Tromsø. Colleagues from the University Centre in Svalbard and the University of Oslo also contributed to the fieldwork. Working in remote conditions, the team traced the meltwater from glacier fronts down toward local fjords to determine how the gas entered the hydrological system.
Gabrielle Kleber of the iC3 Polar Research Hub explained that this geologic source of methane that they find is in addition to microbial sources.
The researchers estimated that land-terminating glaciers across the archipelago transport roughly 182 to 368 tonnes of methane annually through their meltwater runoff.
Ancient Shale Replaces Microbes as the Primary Gas Origin
A critical distinction separates Svalbard’s subglacial emissions from those documented elsewhere in the Arctic. Beneath Greenland’s ice, meltwater methane is typically generated by microorganisms breaking down buried organic matter. In Svalbard, however, carbon isotope analysis revealed a distinctly different origin.

Only three of the 19 rivers displayed a microbial signature. The rest carried chemical markers including propane and ethane—gases characteristic of fossil fuel deposits and geological formations. Nearly half of Svalbard’s land sits on ancient shale and coal seams rich in organic carbon. Over millions of years, subterranean heat and pressure transformed this material into natural gas.
Surface meltwater finds its way to the base of the ice through crevasses and vertical drainage holes. Once it reaches the subglacial floor, the water interacts directly with fractured shale, scouring out ancient gas and carrying it downstream into river networks.
Rock Types and Bed Temperatures Control Gas Release Rates
Geology alone does not account for the varying methane levels found across different river systems. To understand why certain glaciers yielded much higher concentrations than others, the research team deployed ground-penetrating radar equipment towed behind snowmobiles during the winter months.
,regionOfInterest=(960,503)&hash=d2b4de559412f8e04b6eb4cfe06d147ebcd529f7d729ef75328bb46ab92d18e4)
The radar surveys distinguished frozen glacial ice from ice at its melting point, allowing scientists to calculate the share of each glacier bed actively carrying liquid water. Rock type accounted for about half of the variation between rivers, while the combination of shale bedrock and a thawed bed explained three-quarters of the differences.
Glaciers resting on shale with a wet, thawed bed produced the richest water samples. Conversely, glaciers frozen firmly to their beds maintained minimal contact with underlying gas deposits, yielding a fraction of the methane.
Leonard Magerl of UiT The Arctic University of Norway noted that the temperature at the base of glaciers is an important piece of the puzzle, adding that they found the biggest methane releases happened where the right rocks and the right glacier conditions came together.
Contextualizing Natural Emissions Against Human Industrial Output
While the discovery highlights a newly mapped natural feedback loop, scientists emphasize that the scale of these glacial emissions remains modest compared to anthropogenic sources.
Gabrielle Kleber of the iC3 Polar Research Hub stated that these emissions are negligible compared to yearly human-produced methane emissions—which are about a million times more—so that is still where focus needs to be for mitigating climate change.
The newly calculated river transport figures also remain small when compared to other regional sources.
As global temperatures continue to rise, the future trajectory of these subglacial emissions remains complex. Researchers note that understanding both bedrock geology and subglacial thermal conditions will remain essential for modeling greenhouse gas pathways across polar environments.