Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democratic candidate for governor of California, has dropped his lawsuit against Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The suit, filed in November, alleged that Pulte improperly accessed and disclosed Swalwell’s private mortgage records as a form of political retaliation. The dismissal comes as Swalwell faces scrutiny over his residency qualifications for the gubernatorial race and as a separate legal challenge to his ballot access was recently, though tentatively, rejected.
Swalwell’s legal action centered on claims that Pulte weaponized mortgage fraud investigations against critics of former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, argued a violation of federal privacy law and the First Amendment, asserting Pulte engaged in “viewpoint-based retaliation.” Swalwell publicly accused Pulte of combing through the private records of political opponents to silence them, a claim he made on X, formerly known as Twitter.
Director Pulte has combed through private records of political opponents. To silence them. I’m filing suit today to stop him. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287155/gov.uscourts.dcd.287155.1.0.pdf
— Eric Swalwell (@ericswalwell) December 2, 2023
The core of the dispute stemmed from Pulte referring Swalwell to the Department of Justice after raising concerns about potential misrepresentations in loan documents related to a Washington, D.C. Home. Swalwell vehemently denied those claims, characterizing them as “patently false.” The FHFA, under Pulte’s leadership, has been involved in overseeing the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and has faced scrutiny for its handling of mortgage-related issues.
Gubernatorial Bid and Residency Questions
The dropping of the lawsuit coincides with increased attention to Swalwell’s eligibility to run for governor of California. Rival Democrat Tom Steyer has publicly questioned whether Swalwell genuinely resides in California, suggesting he maintains a presence “on paper only.” This challenge centers on establishing a consistent and verifiable California residency, a requirement for holding the state’s highest office.
A separate legal challenge, brought by conservative filmmaker Joel Gilbert, sought to disqualify Swalwell from appearing on the California ballot. Gilbert argued Swalwell did not meet the state’s five-year residency requirement. Still, a California judge tentatively rejected that lawsuit on Friday, finding sufficient evidence to support Swalwell’s claim of continuous residency. The ruling is not final and could be appealed.
Campaign Response and Pulte’s Silence
Micah Beasley, a spokesperson for Swalwell’s campaign, framed the dismissal of the lawsuit as a victory. “Pulte threatened a case. We called his bluff. He never brought it,” Beasley told CNBC. “And we just won on the same nonsense issue in California. Case closed.” This suggests the campaign viewed the lawsuit as a distraction and an attempt to undermine Swalwell’s candidacy.
Pulte has not yet issued a public statement regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit. Attempts to reach Pulte for comment have, so far, been unsuccessful. The FHFA has not responded to requests for comment on the matter.
Impeachment History and Political Context
Swalwell’s history as a vocal critic of Donald Trump is central to this case. He served as an impeachment manager during Trump’s second impeachment trial in 2021, presenting the case against the former president following the January 6th Capitol attack. The impeachment proceedings drew significant national attention and positioned Swalwell as a prominent figure in the opposition to Trump.
The timing of Pulte’s referral to the Department of Justice, and Swalwell’s subsequent lawsuit, raised questions about potential political motivations. Critics suggested the investigation was intended to discredit Swalwell and damage his political prospects. The dismissal of the lawsuit, however, does not resolve those underlying concerns.
The California gubernatorial race is shaping up to be competitive, with several prominent Democrats vying for the nomination. The field includes Steyer, a billionaire businessman and former presidential candidate, and other established political figures. The residency questions surrounding Swalwell, and the now-dismissed lawsuit, add another layer of complexity to the race.
The next step in Swalwell’s campaign will be navigating the remaining legal challenges to his ballot access and continuing to build support among California voters. The primary election is scheduled for March 5, 2026, and the outcome will determine who will represent the Democratic Party in the general election.
What do you think about the dropping of this lawsuit and its impact on the California gubernatorial race? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and be sure to share this article with your network.
