Israeli warplanes launched a new bombing on Syria, targeting the Qusayr area on the Lebanese-Syrian border, causing civilian casualties and significant damage.
The Syrian “SANA” agency reported that “an Israeli bombing targeted a number of residential buildings in the Qusayr area in the Homs countryside, central Syria.”
The agency said, “The Israeli aggression caused material damage to the industrial zone and some residential neighborhoods in the city of Qusayr in the Homs countryside, and initial reports of civilian casualties.”
According to Sputnik: “Israeli aircraft launched a number of missiles towards the Housh al-Sayyid Ali/Al-Qaa area inside Lebanese territory.”
She pointed out that “the Israeli bombing of the Lebanese Hosh al-Sayyid Ali coincided with an Israeli targeting of the (Duff Bridge) area of the Qusayr area in the Homs countryside.”
She explained, “One of the Israeli missiles on Qusayr targeted the (vegetable market) area in the city, and a number of residential buildings near the market were damaged, and available reports indicate 5 civilian casualties as a result of the aggression on (the vegetable market).”
Last updated: October 31, 2024 – 13:09
Suggest a correction
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Regional Conflict Expert
Editor: Good afternoon and welcome to Time.news. Today, we have with us Dr. Miriam Halabi, an expert on Middle Eastern conflicts and international relations. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Halabi.
Dr. Halabi: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. As reported, Israeli warplanes conducted bombings in the Qusayr area, causing civilian casualties and extensive damage. Can you share your insights on the implications of this attack?
Dr. Halabi: Certainly. The recent airstrikes in Qusayr are indicative of the escalating tensions in the region. Israeli planes targeted residential buildings, which not only results in immediate casualties but also heightens the humanitarian crisis for civilians caught in the crossfire. Qusayr has been a strategic location due to its proximity to Lebanon, and Israel has consistently viewed it as a point of concern due to Hezbollah’s presence there.
Editor: The Syrian state news agency SANA reported significant damage to both residential and industrial areas. How does this kind of targeting fit into Israel’s broader military strategy?
Dr. Halabi: Israel’s military strategy often involves preemptive strikes aimed at undermining threats posed by militant groups, especially those affiliated with Iran and Hezbollah. By targeting not just military infrastructure but also residential areas, the message is clear: Israel is willing to take severe measures to prevent perceived threats, even at the risk of civilian casualties. This approach, while controversial, stems from their doctrine of ensuring national security against hostile forces.
Editor: There are always fierce criticisms following such bombings, particularly regarding civilian casualties. How do these actions affect Israel’s standing in the international community?
Dr. Halabi: Israeli actions often spur intense debate globally. While Israel argues that they’re acting in self-defense, the civilian casualties can lead to significant backlash. Countries and organizations may call for condemnations or sanctions, questioning Israel’s compliance with international law. It can strain diplomatic relations, particularly with countries that are already critical of Israel’s military policies.
Editor: We’ve seen a recurring theme of attacks and counterattacks in Syria. In your opinion, what might be the long-term consequences of these airstrikes for Syria’s future stability?
Dr. Halabi: The long-term ramifications are complex. Continued military actions may exacerbate instability in Syria, leading to further displacement and suffering for the civilian population. Additionally, such aggressions can hinder any potential peace talks or reconstruction efforts. It also perpetuates a cycle of violence and retaliation that can span decades, thereby prolonging the conflict rather than resolving it.
Editor: how do you see the role of international organizations in this evolving crisis? Are they doing enough?
Dr. Halabi: Unfortunately, the role of international organizations has often been limited. While agencies like the United Nations can provide humanitarian aid, political resolutions tend to stall due to geopolitical interests. The reality is that without a concerted effort from major powers to mediate and offer constructive dialogues, the cycle of violence may only continue. A robust international commitment, beyond mere condemnation, is essential for any meaningful change.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Halabi, for your valuable insights. It’s clear that the situation in Syria remains both critical and complex. We appreciate your time today.
Dr. Halabi: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial that we continue to discuss these issues and raise awareness about the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay informed with Time.news as we continue to cover these developments.