The betrayal of restaurant wet towels… Detection of up to 1,500 times more bacteria in fluorescent whitening agents

by times news cr

7 out ⁢of 17 processing companies were caught

ⓒNewsis

The Seoul Metropolitan Government’s ‌Public Safety and Judiciary Police Department announced on the 3rd that it conducted on-site crackdowns and collection inspections ⁣on 17 sanitary ​towel processing companies from​ August to October ‍last year, and discovered 7 violators.

Sanitary wet ‍towel processing companies are business offices that process sanitary wet towels by cleaning, sterilizing, and disinfecting methods, package them, and rent them.

The Civil Affairs and Judicial Police Bureau collected ‍sanitary wet ‍towels from 11 of‌ the 17 companies⁣ with poor working environments ‍and asked the Seoul Public Health and Habitat Research Institute to test whether they met the standards⁤ and‍ specifications for⁣ three items, including fluorescent whitening ‌agents, ‍E. coli, and bacterial counts.

As⁤ a result of the inspection,there were 7 violating businesses,with‍ a violation⁤ rate of 41.2%.

Fluorescent whitening agent was detected ‌in ⁤4 out of 7 detected businesses. Fluorescent whitening agent is‍ a chemical substance that makes ⁣wet⁤ towels appear white. ​It is a dye that is​ originally colorless or light yellow, but fluoresces blue and purple⁣ when⁣ exposed​ to ultraviolet light. Continuous exposure to fluorescent whitening agents may cause atopy, allergies,⁢ and itching. In children, it may cause ‌digestive system ⁤dysfunction.

Consequently of the test, the number of bacteria was detected ⁤to be at least 3 to 1,500 ⁣times higher than the standard in all treatment facilities. Microorganisms increase exponentially in a⁢ short‍ period of ⁢time, so using wet towels contaminated⁢ with bacteria in restaurants increases the⁢ likelihood of food poisoning.

The seven ​businesses caught⁣ in this crackdown⁤ will be booked and investigated later. Violation of sanitary product standards and‍ specifications is subject to imprisonment of up to one year or a fine of up to 10 million won in accordance with the Sanitary Products⁤ Management act.

The city requested that if any criminal activity⁣ related to sanitary towels (such as unreported business) ⁣was discovered, they would report it to the Seoul Metropolitan Government Response Center. If the informant reports ⁤with decisive evidence⁣ attached, he or she can receive a reward of‌ up to 200 million won after deliberation by the Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Kwon Soon-gi, Director of⁣ the Public safety and Judicial ​Police, said, ⁢“We will‌ book ⁢and investigate the ‌companies involved and continue to investigate ‍to eradicate illegal activities related to sanitary products that are ​closely related to citizens’ daily lives for the safety of⁢ citizens.”

[서울=뉴시스]

Hot​ news now

  • ​ what ⁢specific health risks ‍are associated with‌ the use of contaminated sanitary⁤ wet towels? ⁣

    Interview: Time.news ‌Editor with Dr. Hyun-soo⁢ Lee, public ​health⁤ Expert

    Editor: Good afternoon,⁣ Dr. Lee. Thank you for joining‍ us today to discuss ⁣the recent inspections of⁢ sanitary wet‌ towel processing companies in Seoul. The findings were quite alarming, with seven out‌ of the seventeen ⁤companies inspected found‌ to be in violation of health standards. What ⁤was ⁤your initial ‍reaction when you heard about this?

    Dr. Lee: Good afternoon! ‍Thank you ⁢for having me. My initial reaction was one of concern. It’s​ troubling ⁢to see such a high violation rate,especially⁤ when it comes to products ⁢that are intended for hygiene and public safety. The fact that 41.2% ​of⁤ the companies inspected were found not ⁢to meet basic sanitary standards poses serious risks⁢ to public health.

    Editor: Absolutely. ‍The report indicated that fluorescent⁣ whitening​ agents were found⁣ in four of those⁤ businesses. Can you explain ⁣to our audience why these‍ agents are problematic?

    Dr. Lee: Certainly. Fluorescent ⁣whitening agents are chemicals used to make products ​appear cleaner and whiter by fluorescing under UV‌ light.⁣ However, their use in sanitary products, ⁢especially ⁣those meant for skin contact, raises important health concerns. Prolonged exposure can lead to allergic reactions, skin ‌irritations, and even digestive issues, especially ‍in ​children ⁣who are⁢ more susceptible to these chemicals.

    editor: ⁤Recent tests also revealed⁣ a staggering increase in bacterial ⁢counts—up to 1,500 times higher than safety standards. What‍ does this mean for consumers who might use these wet ⁣towels?

    Dr.Lee: This is particularly ‌alarming. The‍ presence⁢ of bacteria at such high levels significantly increases the risk of infections and foodborne illnesses. When these towels are used in food establishments, ​the risk of cross-contamination⁢ is ‍substantial, potentially ‍leading ⁤to outbreaks ⁤of food poisoning. It’s crucial ⁢that consumers are aware and cautious about the sanitary practices⁤ of businesses they frequent.

    Editor: Considering these findings, what actions‌ do you think the government⁢ and public should‍ take to ensure hygiene standards are maintained?

    Dr.Lee: First⁢ and foremost, the government needs to enforce stricter regulations and conduct regular⁣ inspections. Beyond just penalizing violators, there should be educational initiatives aimed at companies about the ⁣importance ⁤of sanitary practices. On a public level, consumers should feel empowered​ to ask about the sanitation⁢ practices ​of businesses, particularly in restaurants and cafes.

    Editor: How significant is public‌ reporting in this ⁣context? The Seoul Metropolitan Government has requested citizens report any suspicious activities regarding ​sanitary product handling.

    Dr. ‍Lee: Public reporting is essential. It creates a⁣ partnership between government agencies and the community,⁤ allowing ⁣for better oversight of businesses.⁤ Citizens ofen ‍come across situations that may slip through⁣ the cracks of official ⁣inspections. By encouraging reporting, ‌authorities can strengthen their investigation efforts and protect​ public health more effectively.

    Editor: Given the penalties ⁢outlined—imprisonment or fines—do you believe these ⁣measures will deter future violations?

    Dr. ⁤Lee: While the potential for imprisonment or hefty fines does serve as a‌ deterrent, the effectiveness⁤ largely depends on the likelihood of enforcement. If businesses see that inspections are irregular or if penalties are not ‌consistently applied, they ‌may not ⁢feel compelled to comply. Consistent enforcement and increased awareness of the consequences are key.

    Editor: ‍Thank you, Dr. Lee, for sharing your ⁣insights on this crucial issue. It’s clear that ‍both regulatory ​action and‌ consumer awareness are vital in addressing these health risks. We appreciate your time today.

    Dr. Lee: Thank you ‍for⁣ having me. I hope this discussion raises awareness and helps‍ improve hygiene standards across the board.

You may also like

Leave a Comment