Among other things, the resolution is against state funding of organizations and projects that spread anti-Semitism, question Israel’s right to exist, call for a boycott of Israel, or actively support the BDS movement directed against Israel. The document makes requests and makes recommendations, but has no direct legal effect.
Critics, however, fear a restriction on freedom of expression, art, science and assembly, especially when it comes to criticizing Israel. More than 4,000 people and dozens of organizations from politics, culture, science and society signed an open letter on Wednesday evening calling for different wordings and further public debate.
The Ampel and Union groups had been negotiating the resolution entitled “Never again now – protect, preserve and strengthen Jewish life in Germany” for months. It was originally supposed to be approved on November 9 last year in response to the Hamas massacre on October 7, 2023.
Interview with Dr. Sarah Cohen, Political Analyst and Expert on Anti-Discrimination Laws
Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Cohen. We’re here to discuss the recent resolution titled “Never again now – protect, preserve and strengthen Jewish life in Germany.” Can you explain what this resolution entails?
Dr. Cohen: Thank you for having me. The resolution calls for the cessation of state funding for organizations and projects that promote anti-Semitism, deny Israel’s right to exist, or support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. It serves more as a guiding document, since it lacks direct legal force, but its implications could be significant.
Editor: The reaction to this resolution has been mixed. Can you elaborate on the criticisms regarding potential restrictions on freedom of expression?
Dr. Cohen: Certainly. Critics argue that this resolution may infringe on fundamental rights such as freedom of expression, art, science, and assembly. There is a concern that its broad language could deter individuals and organizations from pursuing critical discourse around Israel and its policies. Over 4,000 people and various organizations have expressed the need for a different wording in the resolution, advocating for a more nuanced public debate.
Editor: What are the implications of this resolution for Jewish life in Germany and discourse around Israel?
Dr. Cohen: On one hand, the resolution aims to address the rise in anti-Semitism and reinforce Jewish life in Germany, which is vital for social cohesion. On the other hand, if misapplied, it could foster an atmosphere of fear where legitimate criticism of the Israeli government or its policies might be curtailed. Therefore, the resolution’s implementation will require careful consideration to balance these competing interests.
Editor: Given the current public divide, what practical advice would you offer to organizations navigating this complex landscape?
Dr. Cohen: Organizations should emphasize clear communication about their objectives and maintain an inclusive dialogue. They can benefit from developing a framework that distinguishes between valid criticism of state policies and anti-Semitism. Engaging with legal experts to ensure compliance with the resolution while protecting free speech will also be crucial.
Editor: How do you foresee the resolution affecting political discourse in Germany?
Dr. Cohen: The resolution is likely to heighten debates on related issues, possibly polarizing discussions around Israel. Political groups must navigate this landscape delicately, balancing their support for Jewish communities with respect for diverse opinions. It’s essential for policymakers to promote a measured dialogue that encourages varied perspectives while condemning hate.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Cohen, for your insights. This resolution brings to light the intricate relationship between anti-Semitism, free speech, and the support of Jewish life in Germany, and it will certainly be a focal point in future discussions.
Dr. Cohen: It’s my pleasure. The ongoing conversation around this topic is critical, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss it.