The capital of chandra. The exhibition examines the myth of artists from Ostrava

by times news cr

“They were convinced that what we do is​ not art. They didn’t want to exhibit us,‍ they fought against us with all their might,” ‍recalls René Rohan, ‌how Ostrava artists‌ split ‌into two ​camps in the early 1990s.⁢ He‌ belonged to‌ the modernists eager to ​catch up with ⁢the West‍ and the trends that had passed the country ⁣under communism.‌ On the opposite side stood those ⁤whom Rohan⁣ describes as‍ adherents of⁤ socialist realism.

The⁢ art created in Ostrava after 1989 ⁣is now represented by a generously ⁣conceived ⁣exhibition organized by the Gallery of the‍ City of Prague in⁣ the Municipal Library. It ⁢was prepared by ‍curators Martin ⁤Netočný⁤ and ⁣Tomáš Knoflíček. It is⁢ called Return survey: Ostrava and will last until february 9 of next year.

The ​name comes⁢ from the social sciences and means a‍ return to⁣ the ⁢investigated‌ phenomenon⁢ in case of suspicion that earlier findings do not correspond to the truth.

The podcast with René Rohan and Martin ⁢Netočný can be listened to here:

The arrival of postmodernism in​ post-communist Ostrava is evidenced by the work ⁢called Superstart, which was created for ‌the prestigious Biennale ‍in Venice. In 2003,⁤ Christ hanging on the‍ athletic rings was depicted by a group that ⁢included René rohan.it called‍ itself Kamera skura, and ‍its members promised‌ themselves not to ‌exhibit individually under their ​own names.they created Jesus with Slovak artist Erik Binder.

Now the gymnastic savior appears on the ​poster for the Prague⁢ exhibition -​ and sometimes causes outrage. “We‌ didn’t intend to offend⁣ Christianity or make fun of a religious symbol,” 51-year-old rené⁤ Rohan recalls today. “Christ in contradiction​ is at ease, basically asleep and floating with ease, although he is in maximum tension. So ‍the first meaning was the⁢ victory ‍of spirit ‍over matter.”

According to Rohan, another line of⁢ the work first exhibited in ⁣Italy represented the religious ecstasy with which the soccer ⁢audience there ​reacts to a goal. At the same time,​ the statue commemorated the Czechoslovak ​athlete Alois Hudek. In 1936,at the famous Olympics in ⁣Berlin,allegedly ‌to the displeasure‌ of ⁣Adolf Hitler,he⁤ won the gold medal with a phenomenal performance in the circle exercise.

“This is ⁢a very typical postmodern ‌strategy that‌ has ⁢appeared in art since​ the ⁤seventies. In the context of the Ostrava scene, individual​ Christian and other cultural symbols appear in different contexts,” explains curator ​Martin Netočný.

He mentions the artists ‍Daniel ⁢Balabán and Marius Kotrba, whose works are also⁤ included in the exhibition at the City library. “They are‌ religious and work with⁢ religious themes to, say,⁤ deal with their personal ​biography, religious ​upbringing ​or rigidly‍ religious childhood. Whereas Kamera skura ‍is a secular group,⁣ none of the members​ are religious ⁤and they work with Christ as ⁣a cultural symbol,” compares the expert.

The exhibition does not stop only at‍ the beginning of the 90s. When investigating the question of ⁤whether there⁤ is “Ostrava art” gifted with the rawness ​and​ directness associated with the Silesian metropolis, visitors can also look forward to newer works by‍ Daniel Balabán,⁤ the group I love 69 ⁣popgejů, ‍Petr⁤ Lysáček, Pavla Malinová, Hana Puchová, Jiří Surůvka or Jan Vytiska.

“For the ⁤people of ⁢Prague, the Ostrava scene was very engaging,‍ because it was isolated ‍and specific.⁢ A bunch of exotics that arrive, they spoil the hype, everyone ‍gets ⁣drunk and their⁤ art has character,” smiles René Rohan.

It recalls the ⁣words of​ the now deceased writer jan Balabán about the Ostrava chandra as the prevailing feeling ‍of the place. “We⁣ made ‍fun of ‍it, but the oppressive atmosphere of an industrial city that doesn’t want culture was always there,”⁢ he ‌admits.

René Rohan compares the⁣ relationship ​of Ostrava to Prague to the connection of the​ Austrian city of ⁢Graz, the‌ second largest city in the country, ⁤with⁤ the local metropolis. “If we look at austria, which is approximately the same size, Graz is a cultural center on the same level as Vienna. Graz has its own cultural scene, but ⁣one cannot speak of exoticism.Ostrava ​has not succeeded in this yet. Despite the ‌efforts⁤ of many ​who⁤ are trying‍ in Ostrava⁤ to​ build cultural institutions, Ostrava is not at the level, financially, or⁣ the importance it deserves. This ‍makes me sad,” concludes René Rohan.

Welcome to the Na dotek podcast.Petr vizina’s guests are the artist René Rohan and the curator ⁢Martin Netočný. to listen on the platforms: Soundcloud, Spotify,‍ Apple Podcasts and Spreaker.

– What are some key themes explored in the “Return survey: Ostrava” exhibition?

Time.news Interview: ‍The Evolution of Art ⁤in ‌Post-Communist Ostrava

Editor (E): Welcome, listeners! Today, we have a ⁢fascinating conversation lined up. Joining us is René Rohan, a prominent figure in the Ostrava art scene, along‍ with Martin​ netočný, one of the curators‍ of the groundbreaking exhibition, “Return⁢ survey: Ostrava.” Thank you ‌both for being here!

René ⁤Rohan (R): Thank‍ you for having us! It’s a pleasure too discuss⁢ our journey.

Martin Netočný (M): Absolutely! Excited to‌ share insights about ​the exhibition ⁣and ​its relevance.

E: René, you mentioned in⁣ the article that there was a meaningful divide among artists in Ostrava during the early ⁣1990s. Can you ⁣elaborate on that?

R: Certainly. When communism fell,there was⁢ a surge of modernist artists eager to experiment and push boundaries. We wanted ​to catch⁤ up with Western art movements that had been stifled during the regime. In contrast,there was‍ a faction that clung to socialist‍ realism,which they viewed as the only true form of art. It was a clash of ideologies,and frankly,it was quite ⁤intense.

E: That must have created‍ a ​challenging habitat. Do you believe this⁤ schism impacted the development of art in the region?

R: Absolutely.​ The tension forced many of us to defend‍ our ​work,​ and in doing so, we contributed to a vibrant discourse. ‍It was a painful but‌ necessary process that ultimately‍ enriched the art scene. As artists, ⁢we had ‌to navigate these differing⁤ beliefs to⁣ find our own voices.

M: And that’s precisely what we aim to showcase⁤ in the “Return survey: Ostrava” exhibition.We’re not just displaying artwork; we’re highlighting this⁤ historical journey—a return to⁢ reflect and re-assess ‌what has been created in Ostrava since 1989.

E: That’s a powerful ‍concept. How did you select ⁢the pieces for⁤ the exhibition, and​ what was⁤ the curatorial vision behind it?

M: ‍We approached it⁤ as investigators revisiting ​a case. We wanted to ensure ⁣that we looked beyond the initial​ narrative shaped by ⁣time ⁤and politics. Each piece selected ⁤speaks to the evolution​ of thought and style, reflecting​ the diverse paths artists took in response⁣ to their environment.

E: René,‌ can you‌ give ⁣us an example of a‌ work ​that notably resonates with this theme?

R: ‌One piece that ⁤stands out is “Superstart.” It encapsulates the arrival of postmodernism in ⁤our city. ​It challenges traditional notions ‍of what art can be, embracing irony and popular culture—elements ⁤that were once considered taboo under the previous regime.

E: Sounds intriguing! As the art scene evolves, how do you see the role of exhibitions like yours in shaping public⁤ perception?

M: Exhibitions⁢ are crucial for fostering dialog. They not only serve as a platform​ to showcase art but also as ⁤a means to catalyze ​discussions about​ history, identity, ‍and societal change.‍ the ⁣narrative around‍ art is as⁣ significant‌ as the art itself. We hope ‌visitors leave with⁣ questions, ​reflections, and perhaps a deeper understanding of Ostrava’s⁢ artistic⁢ legacy.

E: René, any final thoughts on ⁤where you‍ see⁢ the Ostrava art scene heading in the⁢ future?

R: I believe we ​are at a pivotal moment. The younger generation of artists is ⁣experimenting ⁢fearlessly, unafraid to challenge conventions. I see⁤ a bright future—one that embraces complexity, diversity, and a mix of ⁤influences. It’s an exciting time to be part of‌ this community!

E: thank you both for sharing ​your insights today.It’s ⁢clear that the art scene in Ostrava ​is ⁢not just⁣ surviving but thriving, pushing boundaries and ​redefining what⁤ it means ‌to be an artist. ⁣we look⁢ forward to exploring⁤ the⁢ “Return survey: Ostrava” exhibition!

M: Thank you for having us!

R: It was ​a pleasure!

E: And thank you to our listeners for‍ tuning in.be sure to check out the exhibition ​running until February 9. until next⁣ time!

You may also like

Leave a Comment