The compensation that the H&M store must pay to deputy Camila Flores

by times news cr

Representative ⁤Camila Flores (RN)⁣ recounted what she experienced in the H&M store ‍and appreciated that⁤ the Court of Appeals had reversed the first instance ruling.

The H&M store must pay you‌ a millionaire compensation to deputy‍ Camila Flores (RN)after being denied care in 2019 at ​the premises‌ located in ‍Casa Costanera, in Vitacura.

This was determined by the Court ⁣of Appeals of Santiago, after the courts⁤ in the first instance ruled in⁢ favor of the store, following the complaint filed⁢ by the legislator​ in the Vitacura Local Police Court, where accused of ⁢possible⁤ discrimination⁢ within ⁣the‌ framework of the Zamudio Law.

“I ⁢remember trying on the clothes and when I got to the checkout and the saleswoman told me I do not attend ‍fachos and even ​less pacos. I was frozen.I didn’t know what to do“, the parliamentarian told El Mercurio. ⁣

“I was with my husband and he took out his phone and started recording the situation. They ​called a store ‍manager and, obviously, He took the side of the vendors and told us that the‍ workers ⁣acted under the⁤ protocols“added Camila⁣ Flores.

He then reported that “we left ⁤and​ I immediately started ​the process ⁢and⁢ invoked the ‌Zamudio Law. The civil lawsuit​ I filed ruled in favor of the store and ‌I ‌appealed. with the appeal, the first instance ruling was reversed.”

What⁣ does the⁢ ruling that ⁢favored Camila Flores say?

The ruling of ‌the Court of Appeals of Santiago, in addition to revoking the ruling in⁤ the ⁢first instance, established that “the deduced infringement complaint is accepted“, ​according to what was revealed by CNN Chile.

At⁢ the same time, the​ text adds that due to the above “the accused is sentenced to pay a fine and a tax benefit equivalent to 100 Monthly Tax Units ($6,700,000, approximately)“.

he also ⁣explained that with respect to the civil action‌ undertaken by representative‌ Camila Flores against H&M, “it is indeed reserved to the parties the right to discuss this issue in the execution of ​the judgment or in another diverse trial“.

You may also like

Leave a Comment