An explosive court docket doc unsealed 23 years after the terrorist assaults of September 11, 2001, exhibits how deeply concerned Saudi Arabia was in Al Qaeda’s machinations. Ought to the Bush administration have attacked the Saudis militarily slightly than Iraq?
This information was first introduced by the well-known US journal “The Atlantic”.
The doc of the important case in America is 71 pages lengthy, ECF No. It bears case reference 9368 and is situated within the New York District Court docket. Just one conclusion may be drawn from the knowledge it accommodates: with out the energetic help of the Saudis, Osama Bin Laden’s terrorist group would by no means have been in a position to perform its plans to assault the World Commerce Middle and the Pentagon.
All of this stands in stark distinction to the US overseas coverage doctrine, which stays in power to at the present time, that it’s primarily Saddam Hussein’s Iraq that helps al-Qaeda financially, structurally and personnel-wise. Was the “conflict on terror” declared by US President George W. Bush primarily based on a mistake?
Billion greenback compensation declare
The now-emerging file is on the middle of a lawsuit that has been happening since 2018, by which surviving kin of September 11 victims are suing the Saudi state for billions of {dollars} in damages. The Riyadh authorities is doing every little thing it will probably to cease the trial. The choice on whether or not the case will proceed or not will probably be made within the coming weeks.
If Decide George Daniels guidelines in favor of the plaintiffs, long-kept secrets and techniques concerning the assaults involving 2,977 victims may come to gentle. At the very least the victims’ kin are satisfied of this. “It is like we discovered a smoking gun, irrefutable proof. The general public must see this,” plaintiff Brett Eagleson, who misplaced his father within the Twin Towers collapse, wrote within the Boston Herald.
Radical cleric and false pupil
Certainly, 71 pages have a major explosive potential in geopolitical phrases. On the middle of the file, ready with the assistance of British authorities and retired FBI brokers, are two Saudi residents: radical cleric and accredited Saudi diplomat Fahad al-Thumairy, and doctoral pupil Omar al-Bayoumi, who allegedly really labored for the Saudi secret service. Each have lengthy been suspected of aiding the attackers. These two names are additionally talked about within the official “9/11 Fee Report” dated 2004.
In accordance with the indictment, the duo acquired the 2 September 11 attackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, who have been accountable for hijacking American Airways Flight 77 and crashing into the Pentagon, once they arrived in the USA on January 15, 2000, and instantly took them to Southern California. He launched them to a neighborhood group of like-minded radicals in .
On this method, al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi have been rapidly supplied with an condo, automobiles, driver’s licenses, telephones, entry to flying classes and, above all, monetary help. With out this tight-knit community, the English-speaking attackers would by no means have been in a position to perform their horrific acts, in line with the indictment.
Nevertheless, opposite to earlier experiences, al-Tumairi and al-Bayumi didn’t act on their very own initiative however below the clear directions of the Saudi embassy in Washington and official authorities representatives in Riyadh. The assassins’ help measures have been “intentionally, sustainably and thoroughly” coordinated with Saudi authorities.
Along with the paperwork proving this monetary and logistical help for later assassins, there may be different proof that fuels the bereaved’s hopes for a speedy trial.
Incriminating movies discovered
Just a few days after the assaults, British authorities raided Al Bayumi’s house in Birmingham and several other videotapes have been discovered. These tapes have now been launched uncut and in full size for the primary time. Amongst different issues, a “welcome get together” is proven for the attackers al-Thumairy and al-Bayoumi, the place every kind of spiritual leaders and radical members of the Muslim group have been among the many visitors.
Saudis deny all accusations
In accordance with Saudi Arabia, all accusations are utterly unfounded. No authorities official, “high-ranking or not,” gave any “directions” to Omar al-Beyumi or Fahad al-Tumeri to “help” the hijackers. Every contact had “harmless justifications.” The welcome get together was only a gathering of well-behaved mosque-goers, whereas the Capitol clip was nothing greater than a innocent vacationer video. Will the New York choose comply with this reasoning?
In any case, there’s a lot at stake for the Saudi royal household, each by way of its worldwide status and some huge cash. Crown Prince and de facto ruler Mohammed bin Salman has no real interest in being related to jihad or terrorists. The 38-year-old Prince is attempting to create a constructive and cosmopolitan picture for his nation. Though Saudi Arabia is much from a free and liberal nation, the virtually all-powerful spiritual extremist organizations of the Nineteen Nineties – particularly the novel Ministry of Islamic Affairs – have been eradicated.
If the September 11 case is absolutely heard in court docket, outdated wounds will probably be reopened within the nation. In any case, 15 of the 19 perpetrators of the assault got here from Saudi Arabia. Rulers in Riyadh could also be pressured to problem a proper apology and attain an out-of-court settlement with grieving households to keep away from what they see as an embarrassing trial. Such a deal may price a number of billion {dollars}.
Ought to the American Bush administration have attacked the Saudis as an alternative of Iraq?
The USA is one step forward on this regard. There, debate is reigniting over the response of politicians and officers to devastating assaults. If it seems that the six-trillion-dollar “conflict on terror” launched by the USA after 9/11 was primarily based on a mistake, it could elevate every kind of uncomfortable questions: Did US policymakers act that method on objective on the time? Why wasn’t the FBI conscious of the Saudi machinations? Ought to the Bush administration have attacked the Saudis militarily, slightly than Iraq, after the assaults?
The USA can also be not directly accountable for the rise of the Islamic State (DAESH). ISIS was based in 2004 as a direct results of the US invasion of Iraq. At the moment it’s thought of some of the highly effective and financially highly effective terrorist organizations. What would our world be like if People had rigorously fulfilled their safety coverage duties after September 11?
The attention-grabbing level is that this; Whereas 9/11 survivors hope for justice to be served and remaining secrets and techniques to be revealed, the USA and Saudi Arabia are on the verge of signing a protection settlement. The settlement offers for Saudi Arabia’s entry to extra superior US weapons, in addition to US ensures for the dominion’s protection. In return, the Saudis will cease buying weapons from Beijing and restrict Chinese language investments within the nation.
2024-05-23 09:49:27