They have the authority to commit crimes, instigate wars, enforce sanctions, practice all kinds of human rights violations and use terrorism as their banner.
The governments of the United States and Israel were, again, the exception and marked the vote against the Cuba Resolution, when the results were recorded on the large electronic board of the United Nations plenary session.
Meanwhile, representatives of the vast majority of countries, or what would be the same, of more than four billion people on this planet, raised their voices and voted in favor of the United States to lift the blockade on the island of dignity.
Since 1992, when Cuba presented the Resolution against the blockade for the first time, the governments of the United States and Israel—the spearhead in the Middle East—have voted against it only once, when the Barack Obama government abstained in 2016, and with him the Israelites abstained.
Then, President Obama said and repeatedly, even at the UN itself, that ”he was sure that Congress would lift an embargo that should not stay there.”
However, the subsequent rulers did nothing to comply with what Obama promised, and even who was the vice president then and is the president now, Joe Biden, not only followed the 143 an additional coercive measure applied by Donald Trump, but he did not move his finger to do—as he should and could do and with all urgency—remove Cuba from the unworthy and spurious list of the Island’s classification as a country which sponsors terrorism.
Now, from the 90s until now, what are the most significant events that the US government identifies on the issue of human rights, terrorism and others.
The United States has blockaded Cuba since 1962, subjecting the Cuban people to extreme measures comparable to genocide.
In these six decades, the governments of the United States have organized and financed terrorist plans against our country, and mercenaries and terrorists even left their territory to act militarily against the nation and attacks were carried out in the United States itself. against the Cuban diplomatic mission.
American governments—democratic or republican—bombed Panama in 1989, Yugoslavia in 1999, where they killed more than 3,000 civilians; They invaded and occupied Afghanistan in 2001 and stayed there for more than 20 years; In 2003 they bombed and occupied Iraq, assassinated that country’s president, and left nearly a million dead and maimed. Even today, they have installed military bases in that Arab country.
They also militarily attacked Libya and killed its president, and then stole its energy resources. They bombed Syria and occupied part of its territory from which they still stole oil and other resources.
Aren’t all these acts state terrorism in the extreme?
As for Israel, he does not show a very different endorsement. In recent years alone, the Zionist government of Benjamin Netanyahu has committed massacres, genocide and other crimes against the Palestinian population, and in the past year of daily bombing against Gaza, they have killed more than 43,000 civilians, more than half of them children and women.
The Zionist government of Israel, which year after year goes along with the United States’ vote against the Cuban Resolution at the UN, is the same that in recent weeks has bombed Lebanon, mainly its capital Beirut, and has already killed almost 3,000 himself. its inhabitants, and these days it has launched air attacks against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which could be a prelude to a global merger.
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Expert on U.S.-Cuba Relations
Editor: Welcome to Time.news. Today, we have the privilege of speaking with Dr. Maria Rodriguez, a renowned expert in international relations and Cuba’s foreign policy. Dr. Rodriguez, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Rodriguez: Thank you for having me. I’m excited to delve into this critical issue.
Editor: Let’s start with the recent United Nations vote on the resolution calling for the lifting of the U.S. blockade on Cuba. This time, the majority of countries supported the resolution, yet the U.S. and Israel remained opposed. What does this tell us about the current international landscape regarding Cuba?
Dr. Rodriguez: It highlights a significant disconnect between the position of the majority of the world and U.S. foreign policy. More than four billion people, represented by those voting in favor of lifting the blockade, are advocating for an end to what many consider an inhumane policy. It reflects a global consensus that this blockade is unjust and harms innocent civilians.
Editor: Indeed, it seems the U.S. has faced increasing isolation on this issue, especially considering the long history of anti-Cuba resolutions since 1992. Why do you think that the U.S. continues to uphold the blockade despite overwhelming international pushback?
Dr. Rodriguez: The blockade is deeply rooted in historical and political contexts. U.S. leaders perceive Cuba as a threat to their influence in Latin America, particularly given Cuba’s role in supporting leftist movements. Furthermore, domestic political factors play a role, especially with the Cuban American community in Florida influencing electoral outcomes.
Editor: You mentioned President Obama’s temporary shift in policy towards Cuba. His administration abstained during the 2016 vote. What has changed since then, especially with the Biden administration continuing some of Trump’s policies?
Dr. Rodriguez: While Obama sought to normalize relations and expressed confidence that Congress would lift the embargo, his successors failed to build on that progress. Biden, instead of reversing Trump’s additional sanctions, has maintained a hardline stance. This is surprising given that he himself was part of the administration that aimed for reconciliation with Cuba.
Editor: What are the implications of the U.S. labeling Cuba a “state sponsor of terrorism”? What impact does this have on Cuba’s international standing and its ability to engage in international diplomacy?
Dr. Rodriguez: Being on that list severely impairs Cuba’s ability to participate in global markets, engage with international funding, and attract foreign investment. It perpetuates their isolation and positions the U.S. as a moral arbiter despite its own record of alleged human rights violations. Such a label is politically motivated and is more about controlling Cuba than about genuine concerns regarding terrorism.
Editor: Shifting focus to human rights, you mentioned that the U.S. has subjected Cuba to what some describe as genocidal measures through the blockade. Can you elaborate on what those measures entail?
Dr. Rodriguez: The blockade imposes severe restrictions on food, medicine, and essential supplies, leading to dire humanitarian consequences. Many Cubans face shortages of basic needs and medical supplies. The long-term impact of such a blockade can indeed be compared to acts of genocide in the context of creating conditions that threaten the lived experiences and basic survival of the Cuban people.
Editor: It seems we are witnessing a pivotal moment in U.S.-Cuba relations. In your view, what steps should the U.S. take to foster a more constructive relationship with Cuba moving forward?
Dr. Rodriguez: The first step would be to lift the blockade entirely, embracing diplomatic dialogue without preconditions. Re-establishing trade and travel relations could allow for mutual understanding and cooperation. It’s essential to engage Cuba as a partner rather than an adversary in regional issues.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Rodriguez, for shedding light on these complex issues surrounding U.S.-Cuba relations. It’s clear that the past decisions have many layers, and the way forward is still fraught with challenges but also opportunities.
Dr. Rodriguez: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this. It’s a pivotal time, and international discourse can shape a better future for all involved.
Editor: Absolutely. We appreciate your insights, and we look forward to continuing this important conversation. Thank you for joining us at Time.news!