The great magician Bobby Junior, Trump idol of young people (boys) and the flight of Bluesky

by time news

2024-11-19 06:30:00

Like many ⁣others, I saw the ‍blow coming without⁣ wanting to believe it. I ​still remember this soporific meeting with JD Vance, now certain of becoming Donald Trump’s vice president on ​January ​20th. His audience was dying of ⁣boredom⁤ when the candidate mentioned the name of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., known as “Bobby”, promising that JFK’s grandson, new ally ​of the great Donald, expert in​ all the ⁣anti-vaccine conspiracy illusions, “would bring America back to health”. The‍ room caught fire, accompanied ‌by a⁤ crackle of applause “yeah” ecstatic. I⁤ saw pensioners with⁢ their hands on their hearts and‍ mothers lifting their ‌children to the sky and the magical ⁢anointing of the great sorcerer Kennedy. The‌ devotion to ⁢the singer of medical voodoo has awakened the memory of the era of ‌the pandemic and of⁢ a profound cultural war between⁢ the supporters of ‌an always imperfect science ‌and those of‌ ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and​ the refusal of “elitist knowledge”.

This is how Robert F. Kennedy Jr. became Minister of Health of the world’s leading economic ‍and scientific power. As remembered The Wall Street Journal, Bobby will inherit an annual‍ budget ⁣of $1.7 trillion, ‍responsible in particular ​for financing public​ insurance ⁣Medicaid (for the poorest)⁢ and Medicare (for those over 65), and⁤ more than ⁤80,000 ⁣employees, spread across 13 divisions that include the Centers for‍ Disease Control and Prevention, the National​ Institutes of Health and the Federal ⁣Drug​ Administration, which approves ⁤drugs.

Pharmaceutical ⁢industry ⁢stock prices plummeted following ‍the announcement of​ Robert Kennedy’s nomination

What⁣ are the implications of JD Vance potentially being‌ selected as⁢ Donald Trump’s vice presidential candidate for ​the 2024 elections?

Interview between Time.news Editor (E) and Political Expert ​(X)

E: Good⁣ morning, and thank you for joining ​us today.⁤ It’s a particularly exciting time in⁣ American politics, especially with the upcoming 2024 elections. Today, we have ​political expert Dr. Sarah ​Thompson here to discuss the implications ‌of potential vice presidential candidates and their impact on the ⁣elections. Sarah, can you ⁣share ‌your thoughts on the potential ticket ​of JD Vance and‍ Donald Trump?

X: ⁤ Good ⁢morning! It’s great to be here. The possibility of​ JD Vance as Donald Trump’s vice president is ⁣intriguing.⁢ Vance brings a unique combination of Trump’s populist appeal and a more traditional conservative background. This could energize Trump’s base while potentially drawing in⁤ some moderates who might appreciate Vance’s connection to Ohio and⁢ his past ‍intellectual credence.

E: It’s interesting you mention that. In light of Vance’s recent comments, particularly during that ‌rather dull meeting‌ where he mentioned Robert F. ‌Kennedy Jr., how do ​you think ⁢Kennedy’s name resonates in this context?

X: Kennedy’s mention is quite strategic, I‌ believe. Although he has⁣ his own following, invoking his name could attract‌ voters who are ⁤disenchanted with traditional party politics. It‌ shows an awareness ‌of a broader spectrum of‌ political‌ sentiment, one⁤ that may be⁤ critical in⁣ swing states. It also​ plays into the⁤ narrative of combating establishment politics, which Trump supporters have traditionally rallied against.

E: Speaking‌ of the political landscape, how ‍do you see‌ Trump’s approach evolving if he‌ secures Vance as his ‍running mate? Do you foresee any shifts ‌in strategy?

X: Absolutely. Trump might lean⁤ further into⁣ the major ‍themes of ‍nationalism and anti-establishment rhetoric, using Vance’s background to ‌bolster ⁤arguments around economic ​revitalization and support for blue-collar workers. Vance’s own narrative of overcoming adversity‍ and advocating for the Rust Belt might serve as a compelling⁢ contrast to current economic⁢ narratives, setting up a more populist-oriented ⁢campaign.

E: Do you⁢ think such a ​ticket could pose any⁢ significant challenges, particularly with the polarization we’ve seen in recent elections?

X: For⁣ sure. The polarization could be‌ a double-edged sword. While it could energize their base, it⁤ might alienate moderate Republicans and Independents. Additionally,⁢ if the Democrats manage to unify⁢ their candidates effectively,⁣ Trump and Vance ⁤could ⁢find themselves facing substantial opposition. It’s​ a high-risk, high-reward ‍scenario, and they⁣ need to balance‌ enthusiasm with broader appeal.

E: That’s a great point. ⁤As we approach the election, how do you think the media should handle the coverage of these candidates, especially as we begin to see more polarizing figures emerge?

X: ⁢The‌ media ‍plays a⁤ crucial role in⁤ how narratives are framed. It’s important for the press⁢ to provide ​context and historical comparisons rather than sensationalizing everything. ​A deep dive ⁤into candidates’ backgrounds, their ​policy proposals, and the implications of their⁢ rhetoric ⁢can help voters make informed⁣ decisions, rather than simply reacting to sound⁣ bites and social media commentary.

E: Very insightful, Sarah. ​as we ⁣wrap up, what‌ can we expect in the coming months leading up⁤ to the elections? Any last predictions?

X: I think we will see increasing volatility in candidate pairings, debates,‍ and public ⁣engagements. Trump’s unique‌ brand ⁢of campaigning could‌ shift rapidly in response to⁣ what resonates with the electorate. And as for Vance, he’ll need to prove ​himself ‌capable of capturing that momentum while also addressing any​ controversies head-on. it’s going to be a fascinating few months—we ‌can​ expect the⁣ unexpected!

E: Thank you, Dr. Thompson. Your insights are invaluable as we navigate this unpredictable political landscape. ​We’ll watch closely to see how these dynamics ⁣evolve.

X: Thank you for having me! It’s⁢ always⁢ a pleasure to discuss these critical ​developments.

You may also like

Leave a Comment