Title: Judicial Authority Dismisses Claims of Right-Wing Figures Regarding High Court Interference
The judicial authority has issued a response to the claims made against the High Court by right-wing elements, including Justice Minister Levin and Prime Minister Yair Netanyahu’s son, stating that the allegations are baseless.
The statement comes amidst allegations that the High Court interfered with instructions to open fire and changed security arrangements behind the scenes. In response, the judiciary clarified that these claims are “senseless” and lacking evidence.
The judicial authority further addressed an incident in 2018 regarding the IDF’s policy of opening fire near the Gaza Strip, stating that the petition submitted to the High Court was unanimously rejected, and there was no basis for the claim that the opening fire instructions were changed due to the High Court’s ruling.
Moreover, the authority refuted allegations of behind-the-scenes negotiations influencing the court’s rulings, emphasizing that the judges discuss petitions in the courtroom and do not hold meetings related to the petitions in any other framework.
The reference was published in response to Justice Minister Levin’s recent interview, during which he called for a change in the judiciary’s attitude, specifically regarding IDF operations near the border with Gaza. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s son also came under scrutiny for sharing statements against the Supreme Court, accusing it of changing laws and procedures behind the scenes.
The judiciary’s response to these claims aims to dispel any misunderstandings and reaffirm the court’s commitment to following due process and upholding the rule of law.
With this statement, the judicial authority seeks to address and ameliorate these allegations put forth by right-wing figures, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity and independence of the judiciary.