Title: The Historical Battle Fueling the War in Ukraine
Subtitle: Ukrainian Harvard historian highlights the deep-rooted origins behind the conflict
Date: [Current Date]
In a shocking turn of events, the war in Ukraine has reignited, and according to Ukrainian Harvard historian Serhii Plokhy, this was an inevitable consequence of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s historical fantasies. Plokhy claims that the war is deeply connected to Russia’s self-image and its perception of the immediate region as its own sphere of interest.
In an essay published on the Kremlin’s website in the summer of 2021, Putin controversially asserted that Russians and Ukrainians are one and the same people, dismissing the idea of Ukraine as an independent state formation. Just six months later, Putin initiated a full-scale invasion of Ukraine with an attack on Kiev.
Plokhy, an award-winning author and professor at Harvard University specializing in Ukrainian history, argues that the war in Ukraine is rooted in a historical battle that predates the conflict itself. He points to the origins of the medieval kingdom of Kievan Rus, which was established in Kiev and is believed to have been founded by Scandinavian Vikings who traveled from present-day Sweden. Over time, the kingdom became Slavized, laying the foundation for legal systems and dynasties for both Russians and Ukrainians.
Historically, Kiev has been considered the cradle of the Russians, and this perception has fueled claims and disputes over the region, particularly by the autocrats of the emerging Russian Empire. Plokhy also highlights a Swedish connection in the 18th century when a Ukrainian state formation, known as the hetmanate, existed as a kingdom of Zaporizhzhya Cossacks. The hetmanate opposed Russian control and initially supported Sweden in the Great Nordic War. However, they suffered a decisive loss in the Battle of Poltava, resulting in their incorporation into the Russian Empire.
Throughout history, Ukrainians have repeatedly sought their identity and independence, leading to revolts and attempts to form an independent country. Plokhy emphasizes that this continuous struggle for autonomy suggests a distinct entity separate from Russia. However, Putin’s embrace of Russian imperialism and the failure to recognize Russia as a rightful leader in the post-Soviet area has intensified tensions between Russia and Ukraine since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Plokhy warns that the outcomes of this war will have a profound impact on the writing of history. If Ukraine manages to resist Russian aggression and achieve victory, it would not only be a triumph for Ukraine but also force Russia to reevaluate its modern identity and role in the world. Conversely, a Russian victory would perpetuate efforts to destroy Ukrainian culture and the nation, further deepening the rift between the two peoples.
As the war in Ukraine continues to escalate, the destruction and loss of life will undoubtedly leave lasting scars for generations to come. Plokhy stresses that this conflict highlights the fundamental rule that great empires do not perish peacefully and that wars and conflicts often accompany the dissolution of such powers. The war in Ukraine serves as a sobering reminder of this historical truth.
In conclusion, the war in Ukraine exposes the deep-rooted historical battle between Russians and Ukrainians for their identity, independence, and control over the region. As the conflict rages on, it not only shapes the present but has far-reaching implications for the future, both for Ukraine and Russia.