The LKL judges’ division defined the episodes that brought about the talk in Panevėžys

by times news cr

2024-05-15 14:28:54

Because of some conditions, there was loads of dialogue, so the LKL judges’ division critiques the episodes and offers explanations.

Episode no. 1

With ~2 seconds left within the 4th quarter, Utena’s TJ Starks makes a three-point layup. Defending, Panevėžys participant Deividas Sirvydis jumps ahead in direction of the thrower. Starks lands on D. Sirvydis’s proper leg whereas touchdown along with his left foot, and lands on the correct foot of the “7bet-Lietkabelis” basketball participant along with his proper foot.

In response to the rule, the attacker has the correct to land in a spot that was free earlier than the attacker jumped, so the referees appropriately awarded a touchdown foul to the defender accountable for the contact.

Episode no. 2

After an inaccurate throw by TJ Starks, Ajdinas Penava and D.Sirvydis battle for the rebound: each of them intention for it with out breaking the foundations. Within the battle for the ball, Penava’s hand contact with D. Sirvydis’ shoulder is just too small to be recorded as a foul in such a scenario.

The ball is caught by the tall participant of the Utena staff, who’s in a greater place. Džorže Gagići’s try to clear the ball by smacking Utena’s striker over the arm is to be ignored as an insignificant contact that didn’t have an effect on the additional course of the sport.

Episode no. 3

Utena’s participant Ivan Vraneš isn’t answerable for the ball thrown from out of bounds, and continues to battle with “7bet-Lietkabelis” participant Gabriel Maldūnas. Grabbing the ball with two palms, the “Uniclub On line casino – Juventus” basketball participant tries to cross it to a teammate, however G. Maldūnas cuts him by the palms from behind.

The ball falls out of I. Vraneš’s palms, the referees rightfully document a foul on the Panevėžys staff participant, who then, standing up, hits the mendacity Utena participant on the wrist, however it’s an unintended contact, not an intentional act, so no penalty is awarded.

2024-05-15 14:28:54

You may also like

Leave a Comment