The negligence in the death of little Alejandro after receiving the chickenpox vaccine

2023-12-14 13:33:35

A few weeks ago the testimony of experts in the «Case» was held. death of a child due to the Varivax vaccine against chickenpox” that we carry in the Almodóvar & Jara buffet.

It was an expert opinion on an important issue. Varivax It was approved for administration in early childhood in Spain thanks to the pressure exerted by the pharmaceutical agreement. Sanofi-MSD that produces it. This is how we told it at the time:

Chickenpox vaccine: No Gracias Doctors document the “commercial connection” of the pediatric lobby

And that’s how he told us about Varivax Francisco Salmeronhead of the Vaccines area of ​​the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS), who was dismissed for this and has already died, in the interview we did:

What the EMA say [Agencia Europea de Medicamentos] and the AEMPS say it in their authorization work. It is clear that the vaccine must follow official recommendations.

In Spain, the recommendation for the vaccine was adolescence to those who had not had chickenpox, as was the case in most of Europe. In collaboration with the manufacturing company, scientific societies pressure and they manage to introduce the vaccine into the vaccination schedule.

That is, at this time there is a recommendation for the use of the chickenpox vaccine by the health authorities, which includes its introduction into the vaccination schedule in early childhood, but it is not usual in Europe and it was necessary modify the chickenpox vaccination schedule.

This was done without respecting the recommendations of the procedure that was established at the time to provide guarantees for these processes (Evaluation criteria to justify modifications in the Vaccination Program). “This study should be done.”

Francisco Salmeronhighest official authority on vaccines in Spain.

So let’s go to trial because a child dies 12 hours after administering the vaccine and that he had previously had reactions described in the product’s technical sheet, such as leg weakness during the day and fever.

Alejandro (in the photos) died after receiving a vaccine that should not be given in early childhood due to lack of scientific evidenceaccording to technicians from the AEMPS and the Carlos III Institute.

And what happens next? Well, the health system and everything that surrounds it begins to deny the causal relationship between treatment with that vaccine and its subsequent death.

An autopsy is performed on the minor child and the tests that should be done when there is suspicion of death after vaccination are not performed.

Any relationship is systematically denied and they say that the child dies of sudden death.

To achieve all this, the Administration’s insurer hires the most notable heads of Pediatrics services, closely linked to the Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP) – in turn this society is closely linked to vaccine manufacturing laboratories-.

The insurance and Administration experts forget about the pharmacological causality criteria, they only focus on the clinical data and the lack of a proper autopsy. They deliberately forget to deal with the case in a responsible manner.

The small He would not have died if he had not been given the vaccine. It is a case of how the system systematically denies any fatal outcome after a vaccination. This misrepresents the official safety data of the product.

The parents of the deceased child fight for pharmacovigilance protocols after each pediatric vaccination. There are none. They think that when the child experienced reactions they should have taken him to the hospital. The health system, instead of doing so, tells you give him ibuprofen…

These parents think that the Administration has denied everything for political and commercial interests. There is no genetic cause of death. Discarded. There is no cause of poisoning. The vaccine, however, does have toxicological potential.

As my fellow lawyer explains Francisco Almodóvar:

We fight so that it does not happen again and that health services have care protocols after adverse reactions described in the technical sheet and leaflet. There is corruption. An attempt is made to cover any damage…”

Francisco Almodóvarlawyer coordinator at the Almodóvar & Jara Law Firm.

It is curious that the defendant’s experts said that a vaccine has no toxicological effect and that there is no deaths attributed to vaccines…when obviously those effects and deaths do occur (there are court rulings that accredit it).

In Spain autopsies are not done well when there are suspicious medications of having caused a serious reaction. In addition, there is a lack of real information protocols on vaccines and adequate care in the event of suspected adverse reactions in infants and adults.

The pharmacovigilance What health services do today is minimal and this is an example: a clear case that does not appear as a death attributed to a vaccine because it is simply not interesting. Despite of family evidentiary effort and that there is no other explanatory reason for the cause of death.

Also highlight how the Administration launches six doctors in this trial to say that it was not the vaccine that caused the death of little Alejandro… six doctors responsible in hospitals…

The lawsuit filed by the family is against the Health Service of the Government of Castilla y León for financial liability due to lack of care protocols for adverse reactions in infants. The case is ready for sentencing.

An important clarification: This case is not about winning or losing. It is a case of improving society and the pharmacovigilance system. Alejandro’s family and we here try to improve the system and that is why we publish.

Related