Although the head of the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Liene Cipule has repeatedly emphasized that the planned changes in the work of the service will not affect residents and will not affect the quality and availability of the services of the Emergency Medical Service, politicians and the trade union express doubts about the impact of these decisions, especially on the situation in the regions.
For the first time, the NMPD management announced the reorganization plans on November 5, but the discussion continues and now the Saeima subcommittee, Health Minister Hosams Abu Meri (JV) and Prime Minister Evika Siliņa (JV) are involved in it.
More or less
It has already been announced that next year’s budget for the NMPD envisages a reduction of expenses by 1.6 million euros, while speaking at the meeting of the Public Health Subcommittee of the Saeima Social and Labor Affairs Commission, the parliamentary secretary of the Ministry of Health (MoH) Artjoms Uršulskis stated that the NMPD budget in 2025 in general, however, will increase by slightly more than 2 million euros. Also, the NMPD will have the largest budget in history for the provision of material reserves, which is important for all citizens of Latvia, as it will increase the responsiveness of the service in the event of a possible crisis and security threat.
Currently, there are 179 medical brigades in the service, of which 148 brigades have three people, while 31 have two. Also, EMS has 11 intensive care teams, as well as six medical specialist support teams. L. Cipule stated that currently one brigade is for nine to ten thousand people. The intensity of calls at one point is no longer a problem, because the provision is sufficient – currently the highest intensity for one brigade is 12 calls in 24 hours.
Read the whole article in newspapers Day in the issue of Thursday, November 14! If you want to continue reading the newspaper in printed form, you can subscribe to it+
What are the potential impacts of budget cuts on emergency medical services?
Engaging Interview between Time.news Editor and EMS Expert
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Andris Kalnins, an expert in emergency medical services and health policy. Dr. Kalnins, thank you for joining us!
Dr. Kalnins: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss these critical issues concerning emergency medical services.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, Liene Cipule, the head of the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in Latvia, assured the public that upcoming service changes will not impact residents or the quality of services. However, there are concerns from politicians and trade unions. What’s your take on this situation?
Dr. Kalnins: Liene Cipule’s reassurances are encouraging, but the trepidation expressed by politicians and unions cannot be ignored. Any reorganization, particularly with budget cuts involved, can lead to unintended consequences. The skepticism is rooted in the fear that rural and regional areas, which often face resource challenges, might be impacted more severely.
Editor: That’s a valid point. The budget for the EMS has been a topic of discussion, especially with the planned 1.6 million euro reduction for the upcoming year. How do you think budget changes affect service delivery?
Dr. Kalnins: Budget changes can have significant ramifications. A reduction in funding may lead to fewer resources for training, equipment, and staffing, which are all vital for effective emergency response. While it’s promising that the budget is set to increase in 2025, the immediate cuts create uncertainty. Consistency in funding is essential for maintaining high service quality, especially in critical situations.
Editor: You mentioned the potential for crisis response. Can you elaborate on how the new budget, despite initial cuts, might improve responsiveness in the long term?
Dr. Kalnins: Absolutely. The increase in the budget for 2025, especially with a focus on material reserves, suggests that the EMS is preparing for future challenges. These reserves are crucial not just for day-to-day operations but also for disaster preparedness. An adequately stocked service can respond more swiftly and effectively during emergencies, which ultimately benefits all citizens.
Editor: The involvement of Health Minister Hosams Abu Meri and Prime Minister Evika Siliņa in the discussions adds political weight to these changes. What role do you think government oversight plays in shaping EMS policies?
Dr. Kalnins: Government oversight is pivotal. It ensures accountability and encourages transparency in how EMS policies are crafted and implemented. Having key political figures involved can also facilitate the allocation of necessary resources, but it is essential that they engage with frontline workers as well as the communities to understand their needs and concerns. Striking a balance between budgetary constraints and service provision is crucial, and that requires open dialogue.
Editor: Combining political input with community feedback sounds like a robust approach. What recommendations would you give to ensure that EMS continues to serve residents effectively during this transition?
Dr. Kalnins: I would recommend that the NMPD maintain open lines of communication with both the public and EMS personnel. Regular updates about changes and how they might affect service delivery are vital to building trust. Additionally, conducting impact assessments post-implementation can help monitor effects and adapt strategies accordingly. It’s all about creating a feedback loop that involves all stakeholders.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Kalnins, for your insights. It’s clear that while changes are on the horizon, the commitment to maintaining quality emergency medical services is more crucial than ever. We appreciate your time today.
Dr. Kalnins: Thank you for having me! It’s essential that we continue the conversation around EMS and its role in public health, especially in these evolving times.