‘The poor (are not) poor because they want to’ Jaramillo-Molina

by times news cr

It is likely ​that the phrase ⁣“the poor are poor​ because they want ⁢to” is, in equal parts, as⁢ popular as it ​is unfair. Aware of the latter,the academic and political activist Maximo E. Jaramillo-Molina He ‍played‍ with the⁣ statement and titled​ his ⁣ first ‍book Poor ⁢because they ⁢want to ⁢ (Grijalbo).

“On the one hand, it ​is an extremely‍ common ⁤phrase, which everyone has heard at least once⁣ in their life; ⁣This idea, then, appeals to this phrase so common and so popular. But,‍ on ⁢the other hand, it is also a matter of finding other audiences”, the author stated, in interview with this diary.

You might potentially ‍be interested in: mexico; the ⁢least indebted and with low unemployment: Sheinbaum

“(It is indeed about) dismantling this⁣ poverty‌ guilt⁣ narrativeto turn around ‍diffrent myths that are related to meritocracy, ⁣but ⁤specifically‌ the part of poverty, (which) is perhaps the most common, this⁣ blaming and even humiliation of the poorest peopel, regarding⁣ their life ‍results “I​ think that is what needs to be‍ dismantled,” added the creator of the platform. Kittens ⁢against Inequality.

LOOK FROM OTHER⁢ PERSPECTIVES

Jaramillo-Molina proposes, in the first instance, two key starting ​points: that having or not‌ having something, a little or a lot, is not subject ⁢to a individual problem, and, ⁤conversely, paint a different perspective ‌of what the success, ⁤ and stop making cultural, historical, political and social contexts ⁢invisible.

You may be ⁢interested⁣ in: ‘Go down timidly poverty in Chiapas and increases violence’

“Understanding that we can reach a point of view where, andInstead of competing and hurting each other among so manny peopleRather, let us understand ⁣that there are ways of collaborating and cooperating that ‍can lead to other types of perspectives and results,” stated ⁤the ⁤academic of ⁣Jalisco‌ origin, with the‍ understanding that it will be better for the‍ discomfort ‍to turn into ⁣reflection.

Regarding the vision of success, and how we understand⁢ phenomena,‌ he also⁤ reflected on the “paradox of⁤ inequality”.

“one​ would think that​ in countries where inequality is so ‍visible, so⁤ lacerating, where there ​is so much poverty and few people with such extreme wealth, that there it would⁢ be more obvious that people cannot achieve success, or whatever it is that call success, only with effort, work and ‍your talents.⁢ And that doesn’t happen.”

You​ might potentially be interested in: Povertyfear, and⁢ coercion, the main reasons why they have granted amnesty

A hypothesis regarding this paradox, segregation is so visible in latitudes such as Mexico City: “Something that⁣ usually happens is that people do not⁤ coexist with ⁣different social strata.”

He then recalled the research titled⁢ Parallel Worlds. “Just ⁤like the idea of ​​parallel lines, they ⁢never touch.”

“They have told us ​that ⁤these efforts always have‍ to be⁤ individual, and ​what is being left aside, and what ​we ‌can do, are collective efforts,” commented Máximo, regarding the‌ iimportance of the community vision.

“I think the crucial thing is that⁢ this ecosystem is being generated ⁤in which​ the name ​is not so important,but rather the group,the collective,what is being formed,the work that is being done,and I think that ‌this shows that this moving forward ⁢ in dismantling these ⁣narratives,”‍ he concluded.

Did you know that…?

To the extent‍ that you mix with fewer ‌social ‍strata,it is more challenging for you to understand why someone is rich or,on⁣ the contrary,for the rich to believe that the poor are poor because they want⁢ to.

How‍ does Maximo ‌E. Jaramillo-Molina propose to⁤ challenge the prevailing narratives surrounding poverty in society?

Interview‍ between Time.news Editor and Maximo E.⁤ Jaramillo-Molina

time.news Editor ⁣(TNE): Welcome, Maximo! ItS a pleasure⁢ to have ‌you here ⁣today to discuss your new book, Poor As They Want To.The title itself challenges a widely held belief that the poverty of individuals is a result of ⁢their ‌own choices. Can ⁣you explain the ⁣inspiration behind ⁤this provocative title?

Maximo E. Jaramillo-Molina (MEJ): Thank you for‍ having me! The title is intentionally provocative because it reflects⁣ a common sentiment in ⁢society —‌ that the⁢ poor are to blame‍ for their circumstances. This belief is not only popular but deeply ingrained, and I wanted to challenge it through my ‍work. The phrase encapsulates a narrative that ‌often leaves⁣ those in poverty feeling‍ guilty or ashamed about their situation, which is ⁣fundamentally unjust.

TNE: That’s a powerful point. You mentioned ‌in‌ a previous interview‌ that part of your goal is to dismantle the “poverty guilt narrative.” Could you ​elaborate ‌on what that entails?

MEJ: ​ Absolutely.The poverty guilt narrative suggests that individuals are poor ‍as they ‌lack effort or motivation.This idea is often tied to myths of meritocracy, where success is solely seen as a result of individual⁣ hard ‌work. Though, this overlooks systemic barriers, social inequalities, and ancient contexts that considerably contribute to poverty. My aim is to illuminate thes factors and encourage a shift in ⁢perspective — from blame to understanding.

TNE: It sounds like you’re advocating for a​ more nuanced understanding of poverty. What⁤ inspired ‌you personally ⁣to‍ take⁣ on this ⁤topic?

MEJ: My background in both academia and activism played a meaningful​ role. I’ve witnessed firsthand the ​struggles of individuals‍ in marginalized communities and how their circumstances are often dismissed or misunderstood.This drives my passion for social ‌justice and the need for equitable solutions. I wanted to shed⁣ light on the realities of poverty rather than perpetuate ⁢harmful stereotypes.

TNE: ‌ You also ⁣mentioned in your book the idea‍ of reaching ‍”other audiences.” Who did you have in‌ mind when you were writing it?

MEJ: While I hope to speak to those who are already aware ‌of and engaged in discussions around poverty, I also want to reach skeptics and those who might be entrenched in the conventional views of poverty. I aim to ​spark conversations that challenge preconceived notions and encourage broader discussions about economic justice and systemic causes ⁣of poverty.

TNE: It sounds like a critical discourse that ‌is necessary in today’s society. ​Given the current political ‍climate, where do you see the‌ conversation surrounding poverty ⁤heading in the next few years?

MEJ: I think we’re at a pivotal moment. Ther‍ is growing awareness about systemic⁢ inequalities, especially after recent global events that have laid bare the vulnerabilities of many. As we move ⁤forward, I hope‌ we ⁤see a shift not just in ⁤public discourse but also in policy approaches that address the root causes of poverty rather than merely the symptoms. This could lead to more sustainable and just solutions.

TNE: You’ve certainly given us a lot ​to think about.‌ What do⁤ you⁤ hope readers take⁣ away ⁣from your book?

MEJ: ⁤I hope readers ⁣walk‍ away with a deeper understanding of‌ poverty — that it’s not a choice but frequently enough a complex interplay of​ historical, social, and economic factors. I want​ them to feel‌ empowered to question narratives that blame the⁢ poor ‍for their situation and to advocate for change that addresses the real issues at hand.

TNE: Thank​ you,‍ Maximo.Your insights are ‍incredibly valuable, and I believe they will resonate with many readers. We appreciate you taking the time to discuss your crucial ​work.

MEJ: Thank you for the prospect to share‌ my ⁣thoughts. I’m excited‌ to see how this conversation evolves!

You may also like

Leave a Comment