The PP categorically refuses to support Sánchez’s general budgets after DANA: “There is no right”

by time news

The request made today by ⁢Pedro​ Sánchez⁢ to the Popular Party, ⁣asking to ​support the General State Budgets after the DANA crisis, met direct opposition from ⁢Genoaminutes after making it public.⁢ After the Council of Ministers meeting, Sánchez stated in ⁤a press conference:​ “I hope we can have the ​support of the majority ⁣of the House to be able to prepare ‍and approve the General State Budgets which are even more necessary today than yesterday”.

The ‌national spokesperson of​ the PP, Borja Sémper, said this shortly afterwards. For his part, the president ‌of the Generalitat Valenciana, the popular Carlos Mazón, underlines on the ‌same social⁣ network that “Extraordinary economic measures cannot ⁣be tied to budgets.” ⁤ Mazón quantified the aid needed at⁣ 30 ⁣billion‌ euros.

It’s ⁣a question of the Valencian being able to ⁣recover what is still recoverable -⁤ PP sources assure – not that Sánchez ‍”is fine”. From Genoa‍ they ask ‌that the president ‍of the government stop always ‍thinking about their interests.

The popular ones insist‍ on it ⁤ Your votes ‍will help ensure that the victims receive sufficient help move forward and rebuild the productive sectors of the affected‌ areas. In this line – the same sources insist – the president of⁣ the Popular Party, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, proposed a Valencia Plan from⁣ the PP headquarters⁣ yesterday to address ‌the issue specifically to the Congress.

This is a‌ serious and urgent enough issue, they ⁣underline, to be subjected to the “usual selfish⁣ maneuvers of Sánchez.‍ We will not⁢ approve the General State Budget which Sánchez has not⁤ even presented. Much less use the⁢ victims as blackmail for their own⁢ interests. aid for those affected ​can be approved outside ⁢the budget debate.

The popular sources ‍consulted⁢ regret​ that Sánchez’s​ priorities in this tragedy “are the control of ⁤Spanish television, the implementation of censorship motions ​or the guarantee, as in this case, of budgets through blackmail. This is valid in itself “, they ⁢conclude. “It⁤ is not the policy that Valencians ​ask ‍for and need.”

Follow us on ⁢our⁢ whatsapp channel and don’t⁢ miss⁤ the⁤ latest‍ news and all the news from anten3noticias.com

Interview between Time.news Editor and ‌Political ‌Expert

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome to our latest ‍interview‌ segment, where we discuss the pressing issues of our time. Today, we’re ⁢fortunate to‌ have with ‍us ⁤Dr. Elena Ruiz, a political⁤ expert specializing in Spanish government affairs. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Ruiz.

Dr. Elena Ruiz ‌(ER): Thank ‌you for⁢ having ​me. It’s a pleasure to be here.

TNE: Let’s ⁤dive ⁢right in. Recently, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez ⁤made a public plea to⁤ the Popular Party (PP) for support​ on the General State⁢ Budgets ‍following the aftermath of the DANA crisis. What are your‍ thoughts on this request,‍ and why was it so ‍immediately met with opposition from the PP?

ER: ‌ Sánchez’s appeal comes at a crucial ​moment, especially after the significant damage caused by DANA. His push for unity in addressing the budget is ⁣understandable, as effective governance requires collaboration,​ particularly in a crisis. However, the immediate backlash from the PP highlights the deep political divide in Spain. The party, under Borja ⁢Sémper’s leadership, views Sánchez’s plea as self-serving.

TNE: Borja Sémper asserted that ⁣“extraordinary economic measures cannot be tied ​to budgets.” What does ⁤he mean‌ by ⁣this, ‌and ⁣what implications could it have for⁣ aid distribution to those affected by‍ the ‌crisis?

ER: Sémper’s statement suggests‌ that the urgency ⁢of ‍the crisis requires swift and targeted ⁢financial aid that should not ‌be bogged down by⁢ the usual budgetary process.​ He quantified‍ the necessary support at ​30 billion euros, indicating that the PP believes immediate assistance should be a priority​ over the political ​negotiations⁢ that ⁣can drag on for months. Their ⁢position could result⁢ in urgent aid being delayed or politicized, ⁤which ⁢is a concern for those⁢ in need.

TNE: The⁣ president⁢ of the Generalitat Valenciana, Carlos ‍Mazón, seems ‌to also support a more immediate⁢ response, emphasizing the need for a dedicated‌ Valencia Plan. Could you elaborate on that and its significance?

ER: Mazón’s advocacy⁣ for a Valencia Plan highlights ‍the specific regional impacts of⁢ the DANA crisis and the need for tailored solutions. It’s ⁣significant because it represents‌ a shift towards⁤ regional ‍autonomy in disaster response, acknowledging that local governments understand their unique‌ challenges better ​than a blanket national⁣ approach. This localized‌ support could lead to quicker recovery efforts.

TNE: Right, but could this sense of regionalism create​ further tensions‌ in ⁤the ⁢national government, especially with the ⁤Popular Party pushing back against Sánchez?

ER: Absolutely. The push for regional autonomy can heighten tensions, ​especially‌ for a central government already dealing with a polarizing opposition. If Sánchez is perceived as ignoring ‌regional needs for political gain, it can lead to greater fragmentation⁢ in Spain’s political landscape. This tug-of-war could complicate the ⁤quick response that victims of the crisis ‌desperately ⁣need.

TNE: With the PP‌ reinforcing their ‌stance that ⁢Sánchez must prioritize the ⁣victims’‍ needs over political interests, what ⁤strategies can the government employ to foster cooperation⁢ across party lines?

ER: One potential strategy could be establishing a bipartisan committee specifically focused‍ on disaster recovery. This could create a platform‍ for both parties to collaborate outside of the traditional adversarial context. Additionally, transparency ⁢in the budgetary process and open‌ dialogue ⁣about the scheme⁢ for recovery funding might also ​help to mitigate​ concerns and foster⁢ trust.

TNE: ⁣ Thank you,‌ Dr.‌ Ruiz, for your insights.​ Given the complexity of the current political ​climate, it’s clear that⁢ balancing immediate support with broader budgetary considerations will be crucial ⁤in the coming weeks.

ER: Thank you for ⁢having me. It’s indeed a critical time for Spain, and how leaders choose to ⁣navigate these​ waters​ will have lasting impacts.

TNE: We appreciate ‌your expertise⁣ and‌ look forward to ⁤seeing how this ⁤situation evolves. Until next time!

You may also like

Leave a Comment