2024-08-20 08:51:27
She spent a month in the Mental Health Center in April, after which state charges were not filed for her antisocial behavior
The District Prosecutor’s Office in Plovdiv expects to be officially referred by the singer Dara Ekimova, before considering whether to ask the court for forced treatment of Gergana Nedelcheva from Plovdiv, who is threatening her.
The state prosecution is monitoring the media publications and is aware of the concerns of the young performer, prosecutors know that a report will be filed in this case and are waiting to receive it.
In principle, they could also self-refer to media publications, but since the producer Stanislava Armutlieva announced that they will file a complaint, they are waiting for the official signal.
“24 Chasa” asked Armutlieva on Monday if they had already filed a report. Our lawyers have analyzed all the materials on the cases against the woman in question and we are currently preparing a complex of actions, both in relation to the already initiated pre-trial criminal proceedings based on the inventory of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Haskovo, and in relation to the new threats since Friday. We will assist all law enforcement and law enforcement agencies in every way so that the coercive measures provided for in the Criminal Code are implemented without delay, commented the manager of “Virginia Records”.
On Friday, it was Armutlieva who announced on her Facebook profile that 22-year-old Dara Ekimova was a victim of cyberbullying.
I’ll find you in action and you’ll be brainwashed, I’ll be happy to crack your skull and you’ll rot underground are part of the threats, accompanied by cynicism and all kinds of insults, that the singer received online from the unknown woman. In addition to Ekimova, she threatened the influencer Yasmin Kirilova, as well as another unknown woman. There are also on the Internet
signature for the treatment of the Plovdiv woman,
in which thousands of people have joined.
Interestingly, Armutlieva’s post has already been removed from Facebook. This probably happened after a signal from Nedelcheva or her relatives. My post about the harassment of Dara Ekimova has just been removed. And here it is. Upside down world! I will contest this deletion. Don’t give up!writes Armutlieva on Monday at 9:46 am. And he attached a screenshot of how one of Nedelcheva’s fake profiles shared her photos with the qualification “bloody”.
Nedelcheva is diagnosed with schizophrenia – manic type, and her mother is her guardian. She uses different facebook and tiktok accounts to send the messages. He also does it under public posts of Dara Ekimova’s label. However, due to her illness, the GDBOP can only track her down and confiscate her electronic devices, which does not stop her from getting new ones and starting over.
The prosecutor’s office explained to “24 Chasa” that on April 9, Gergana Nedelcheva was placed in the Mental Health Center in Plovdiv for a period of 30 days by court decision. She spent the whole month, she was not discharged in advance. After that, the state prosecution was not referred to any anti-social acts on her part. Then the actions were based on Yasmin Kirilova’s signal. The influencer was harassed for a long time by the mentally ill woman, who threatened to kill her and her young child.
Although the threats continue even now,
in order for the woman to be treated again, the court must rule again
When the prosecutor’s office is officially referred to and familiarized with all the evidence, the supervising prosecutor will assess how to act – whether there is a crime under the Criminal Code and grounds for filing a request for placement in a medical facility under the Health Act. There is no obstacle to this happening again, although the Plovdiv woman has already spent a month in the Mental Health Center.
The official report will facilitate the work of the prosecution and speed up the process of gathering evidence. After that, experts will be assigned to show Nedelcheva’s mental state, and based on their conclusions, it will be decided how to act. The prosecutor’s office avoids commenting on the case in advance, so as not to cloud the judgment of the supervising prosecutor and he can act on the basis of the collected evidence and his own convictions.