The prosecutor’s workplace proposes to acknowledge the mayor of Druskininkai, R. Malinauskas, as responsible of affect peddling and award him 60,000. euro advantageous

by times news cr

2024-07-03 02:09:51

Additionally, present council member Aivars Kadziauskas is requested to confiscate 30 thousand from R. Malinauskas and his former adviser, who’s believed to have been his confederate within the fee of a corruption crime. euros. A. Kadziauskas himself is proposed to be fined the identical because the mayor – that’s, 60,000. euros.

Prosecutor of the Common Prosecutor’s Workplace Vilma Vidugirienė requested this punishment throughout the court docket session on Tuesday, when the Kaunas District Courtroom was inspecting a case relating to doable corruption within the authorized system. In it, not solely the mayor of Druskininkai, but additionally 5 judges of varied circles obtained accusations.

The costs in opposition to Druskininkai mayor R. Malinauskas and a few judges are associated to the Vijūnėlė property case. Officers say that a big a part of this prison case consists of knowledge on prison acts, which have been used in the summertime of 2018 to probably affect judges of varied situations with bribes and to attempt to save the presently demolished constructing in Druskininkai, publicly referred to as the Vijūnėlė mansion, by the use of illegally adopted choices.

R. Malinauskas is accused of giving 60 thousand euro bribe in order that this mansion wouldn’t be demolished. The mayor is accused of giving a bribe by intermediaries in order that favorable choices can be made within the civil case relating to the above-mentioned constructing and it could not be demolished.

The mayor doesn’t admit his guilt.

“For me, 5 euros is cash, are you able to think about whether it is doable to purchase an individual whom you do not know, you do not know that he even exists on this white earth?” I realized about Zagrecka solely on this corridor, that such an individual exists in Lithuania, what are we speaking about right here? If prosecutors are advised, they usually want promising careers, then they converse,” R. Malinauskas advised reporters after the listening to.

He didn’t cover that the punishment proposed by the prosecutors angered him.

“Sometime we’ll handle, and neither you nor the prosecutors will resolve who would be the mayor of Druskininkai. When individuals do not elect me, then I will go minimize the canine’s poop and now you will not discuss to me. Forgive me, however it is a bit offended and offensive,” the mayor advised reporters, when requested what his possibilities can be of holding the place of mayor if he was discovered responsible and sentenced.

Vijūnėlė Manor, acknowledged as an unlawful construction, was demolished in 2019. in autumn R. Malinauskas has mentioned that the Vijūnėlė property was constructed for him, though formally its proprietor was a fellow businessman, from whom the mayor deliberate to repurchase the completed constructing.

The Prosecutor’s Workplace applies a brief restriction of property rights to the mayor’s plots, that is finished with the intention to make sure that the cash will probably be recovered if the court docket decides on the restoration of the cash. Beforehand, a brief restriction on property rights was additionally utilized to the mayor’s home, however this restriction was later lifted.

This case is exclusive within the historical past of Lithuania, says the state prosecutor on this case, Prosecutor of the Common Prosecutor’s Workplace Aleksandras Kazakovas.

“We now have completed inspecting a large-scale, advanced case. I dare to say that there have been no such circumstances within the historical past of Lithuania, the place the mayor and 5 judges of all courts have been tried on the similar time”, A. Kazakovs, prosecutor of the Organized Crime and Corruption Investigation Division of the Common Prosecutor’s Workplace, mentioned earlier throughout the Kaunas District Courtroom session.

The principle a part of imprisonment is said to crimes of a corrupt nature. The sums of doable bribes given and accepted within the analysis materials vary from 3 thousand. as much as 60 thousand euros, bribes have been paid in money.

Not solely the mayor of Druskininkai R. Malinauskas, but additionally his former assistant, now council member A. Kadziauskas, in addition to former decide of the Supreme Courtroom of Lithuania Egidijus Laužikas, former decide of the Courtroom of Attraction of Lithuania Konstantinas Gurinas, as of 2019, obtained accusations and sat within the dock. the decide of the Courtroom of Attraction of Lithuania Viktoras Kažys, the previous decide of the Vilnius District Courtroom Henrichas Jaglinskis, the previous decide of the District Courtroom of Vilnius Metropolis Robertas Rainys, the previous assistant of the Supreme Courtroom, the son of the previous decide of this court docket, Airingas Kartanas, have been quickly suspended.

Former decide H. Jaglinskis was additionally charged with unlawful enrichment for greater than 51 thousand. euros. This cash was discovered throughout searches and was not declared or confirmed by legally binding paperwork.

The remainder of the defendants are legal professionals’ purchasers, intermediaries within the corruption chain. A complete of 16 pure individuals and one authorized particular person, firm have been transferred to the court docket. This firm goes bankrupt, the prosecutors should not providing it a advantageous as a result of there will probably be no option to gather it.

Egidijus Galatiltis, a lawyer’s assistant who labored in Vilnius, is accused of performing in favor of the mayor of Druskininkai and searching for to bribe decide H. Jaglinskis by D. Zagreckas to affect the judges listening to the case. In response to the case, he obtained 60 thousand from R. Malinauskas by A. Kadziauskas. euros. Half of this quantity was shared by intermediaries, and 30 thousand. D. Zagreckas handed over to H. Jaglinskis.

The prosecutor’s workplace presents imprisonment and fines to former judges.

“Every defendant has completely different prison acts, together with affect peddling, bribery, and bribery, once more, completely different punishments additionally as a result of there are completely different quantities of bribes. The mayor of Druskininkai is accused of affect peddling – that’s, transferring cash to an individual so that he, utilizing his acquaintances and affect over a civil servant, on this case the decide listening to the case, would attain the specified choice,” prosecutor V. Vidugirienė advised journalists after the listening to.

In response to the prosecutor, the mayor is accused of getting dedicated doable crimes as a non-public particular person, due to this fact it’s not proposed to use measures of affect – a ban from holding workplace.

The enchantment court docket decide V. Kažius is proposed to be sentenced to 3 years and 6 months of imprisonment, the previous decide of this court docket Ok. Gurin is requested to be sentenced to 2 years and 6 months, the previous Vilnius district court docket decide H. Jaglinskis is proposed to be sentenced to 3 years of imprisonment and a advantageous. At the moment, the previous decide of the Supreme Courtroom, E. Laužiks, is proposed to be fined.

Ex-judges and different defendants are additionally being requested to forfeit hundreds of sums of cash.

The accused, businesswoman Oksana Sakalauskiena, faces the utmost jail sentence – 4 years – and it’s proposed to pay her 60,000. euro advantageous. The girl was concerned about varied circumstances and allegedly sought to affect court docket choices for cash.

Former Vilnius lawyer Drąsutis Zagreckas is the primary witness on this and different corruption circumstances, he cooperated with the regulation enforcement, gave testimony, helped clear up crimes, due to this fact he’s exempted from prison accountability and is protected by the state.

The case of doable corruption was referred to the court docket precisely two years in the past – in 2022. in July

After the prosecutors have spoken, the legal professionals of the defendants, there are 18 of their case, will proceed to talk. The subsequent listening to will probably be held in August.

It’s not but identified when the decision will probably be introduced, the hearings on this case are actually scheduled till the top of October.

2024-07-03 02:09:51

You may also like

Leave a Comment