the Senate validates the revaluation of pensions in two phases in 2025

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

The measure consists ⁤of increasing all pensions from January 1st to ⁢a level equal to half the inflation. Then a second ‌increase, ⁢in line with inflation, on July 1, ⁢for pensions below the ‍minimum wage.

The ‍Senate continues to rewrite the Social Security funding⁤ bill. The two-stage revaluation of pensions for next year, up to inflation only for pensions below the minimum wage, was approved overnight by senators, with government support. ⁤Approved with 231 votes in favor ⁤and​ 100 ‍against, this amendment to the Social Security budget for 2025 takes‌ up the main lines of ⁢the ⁢compromise negotiated between Prime⁤ Minister Michel Barnier⁣ and right-wing ​strongman Laurent Wauquiez.

The measure, defended by Senator Pascale Gruny (LR), “guarantees a revaluation of all basic ⁣pensions from 1 January to ‍the level of ‍half inflation”he indicated⁢ before the vote. This first increase has already been⁤ estimated at 0.9% by the Budget Minister, Laurent⁤ Saint-Martin. Pensioners who receive a total pension (basic and supplementary)⁣ lower than the minimum wage “it will then be⁣ revalued a second time up to the level of inflation observed on ​1​ July”with⁣ the added ⁢benefit “fill ⁢the deficit” in the first half so ‌that‌ they “they will therefore be fully protected from inflation” added Pascale Gruny.

Revenues expected to decline by‍ 500 million⁢ euros

According to the text of the amendment, such indexation will be complete until “1500 euros gross per⁣ month”. There is also an intermediate level “insured whose‍ pension is slightly higher than this ‌threshold”which will benefit from a revaluation “minorized”. Compared to the government’s initial proposal, which wanted ⁤to postpone the increase in pensions for six months to save four ‌billion euros, the ⁣new version ⁣ “reduces the expected⁤ return ⁢by approximately 500 million”he specified, ​judging ‍the senator “this fairer solution”.

The Minister of Labor, ‌Astrid⁤ Panosyan-Bouvet, however supported this rewrite because “an agreement ⁣was reached with the parliamentarians”. “With one of the smallest⁢ groups in the Assembly”

>replied the ecologist Raymonde Poncet-Monge, deploring that the‌ executive and the ⁣senatorial majority “happy to modulate the decline in purchasing power” pensioners. The socialist Monique Lubin, for her part, ⁣denounced ‌ “a ‍scam” which will result “a dead and definitive loss for all pensioners”.

What are the potential long-term impacts of the recent ⁢pension reforms on retirees’ financial stability?⁣

Interview between Time.news Editor ⁤and ​Pension Reform Expert

Editor: Good morning ⁤and ‌welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re delving into a ‍crucial topic ‍that affects millions of citizens: pension⁣ reforms in our country. Joining ‍us is Dr. Emily ⁤Tran, an⁢ expert in social ⁤security and pension systems.‍ Welcome,⁢ Dr. Tran!

Dr. Tran: ⁣Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to ‍discuss ⁤such an important issue.

Editor: Let’s jump right in. ⁤The recent measure passed by the Senate includes a ⁤two-stage revaluation of pensions. Could you​ break down‍ what‍ this​ means for pensioners?

Dr. Tran: Absolutely!​ Starting ⁤January⁣ 1st, all basic⁣ pensions will‌ see an initial increase⁢ equivalent to half the inflation rate. This is particularly ‍significant ‌for those living on lower pensions, as ‍they⁤ will be further adjusted in July in ​line‍ with ⁤the ⁢full inflation rate.‍ This‌ approach aims to provide some immediate‌ relief, particularly to the​ most vulnerable pensioners.

Editor: It sounds like a balanced approach. The measure was backed by a considerable majority in the ‌Senate. What were some of the key ​factors ‍that led to its approval?

Dr. ​Tran: The political landscape played a major role. The reform was a product of negotiations between Prime Minister Michel Barnier and right-wing leader Laurent Wauquiez, focusing on⁣ a compromise that would appeal ⁤across ‍the aisle. The​ support ⁤from⁣ both sides of the⁢ political spectrum highlights ‍a recognition of⁣ the pressing needs of ⁤pensioners amid rising living costs.

Editor: Senator Pascale Gruny remarked on the importance of this measure during the discussions. How do ⁤you see this impacting public perception ‍of the government’s handling ⁤of social security?

Dr.⁣ Tran: Gruny’s ‍defense of ⁤the measure emphasizes ‌the ‍government’s commitment​ to ⁢supporting⁢ pensioners. If the implementation of these adjustments⁤ is seen as timely⁤ and effective, it could enhance public trust in ⁤the ⁣government’s capacity​ to manage social security⁤ issues. However, perceptions will ‍largely depend on how⁣ well‌ these changes address the actual needs of⁣ retirees.

Editor: Given the ‍ongoing debates about inflation and⁣ its impact on living standards, how significant do you think the estimated 0.9% increase truly is?

Dr. Tran: While‌ 0.9% might seem modest,⁢ it’s essential to consider the broader context of‍ inflation. For many pensioners, especially those living below‌ the minimum wage, ⁣every bit helps. ‌However, this ⁢increase may not fully mitigate the financial pressures they face, especially if inflation continues ⁢to⁤ rise.‌ It’s crucial for ⁣policies to adapt⁤ as economic conditions evolve.

Editor: Right, and speaking of adaptability,‍ are there any recommendations you would make for future reforms to further ​strengthen the pension system?

Dr. Tran: Certainly! First and foremost, indexing pensions more robustly to inflation could provide‌ better ⁣protection against cost-of-living increases. ⁣Additionally, ensuring regular reviews of pension adequacy would help address the​ gap between pension levels and the minimum wage. Lastly, expanding financial literacy ‍programs for retirees would empower ⁢them‍ to make informed decisions about their finances in retirement.

Editor: ⁤ Those ⁤are insightful recommendations, Dr. Tran.⁢ Lastly, what message would you like to⁤ convey ⁤to pensioners ‍who might be feeling anxious about these ⁣changes?

Dr. Tran: I would say to them that while ​the‌ road⁢ ahead may be challenging, the government​ is acknowledging their struggles and making ⁤efforts to provide support. ⁤Staying informed⁤ and ⁢advocating for their ​rights is crucial, and⁢ they⁣ should not hesitate to engage with community resources for assistance.

Editor: Thank ⁤you, ⁤Dr.‌ Tran,⁣ for ​shedding ​light on these ⁢vital pension reforms. It’s been a pleasure having you with ⁤us today.

Dr. Tran: Thank you for having me, and I hope this discussion ⁤helps raise awareness about the importance of social security reform!

Editor: And thank you to our viewers for ‍tuning in! Stay informed and engaged with us‌ at Time.news as we continue to cover ‍developments that matter⁣ to you.

You may also like

Leave a Comment