The unusual judicial agreement between Daniela Aránguiz and Maite Orsini

by times news cr

2024-08-07 15:29:42

Jorge Valdivia’s current partner pointed out that the court decision does not repair the damage caused, but “at least I can rest assured that, in two years, I will be able to continue working in peace.”

In it Fourth Guarantee Court of Santiago The hearing that faced the deputies Maite Orsini (FA) and Daniela Aránguiz, for the complaint filed by Orsini for serious and public libel.

According to the legislator’s legal action, lThe comments made by the former reality show girl directly affected “my dignity as a woman, honor and credibility in my work.”

In view of this situation, the court determined that Daniela Aránguiz has been banned from publicly referring to Maite Orsini for two yearswhile the entertainment panelist ruled out asking for a public apology.

Lawyer Claudio Rojas, Aranguiz’s legal representative, explained that “they were asking us for a public apology and that Daniela should not refer to Maite Orsini any more. In general terms, Daniela never accepted the issue of apologies, there are no public apologies.”

“This case ends simply because Daniela prefers to say I’m never going to talk about Maite againand since that satisfies her, perfect, we end it that way,” he added.

On the other hand, the deputy Maite Orsini was satisfied with the judicial agreement, stating that “the truth is that I am calm, this gives me at least two years of peace. I feel that we achieved the objective when we filed the complaint, it makes me calm, and that is why we accept the proposed agreement with great satisfaction.”

HoweverJorge Valdivia’s current partner pointed out that the court decision does not repair the damage caused, but “at least I can rest assured that, in two years, I will be able to continue working in peace.”

Her lawyer stressed that “the criminal justice system acted in favour of the victim. The accused did not want to go to trial because, taking into account the amount of evidence we had against her to prove the crime, she preferred to reach this agreement to avoid a conviction.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment