Author: Bayram Elshadov
Protests in Georgia against the suspension of EU accession negotiations have continued for the second week. Based on preliminary results,what is happening in Georgia can be described as fitting into the logic of the dynamics of the fading protest. It can be said with absolute certainty that the operation too seize power by force in Georgia failed. The protests will of course continue for some time, but their final outcome is only a matter of time. The authorities in Georgia managed to save their country, and for this we must give credit to the Georgian authorities, who withstood several days of pogroms, then precisely beheaded the riot and actually stopped the protest.
The plan of the collective West to carry out another color revolution in Georgia failed, despite the fact that a lot of effort was put into such a scenario. At first there was an attempt to change power through elections, but the majority of the people of Georgia voted for the ruling Georgian Dream. Then, with Western money, an agent network was created in the form of civil society and non-profit organizations. When this option did not bring success, the bet was placed on traitors within the government (a number of ambassadors, employees of the Foreign Ministry and other government agencies resigned). To the grate disappointment of the West, none of the above could disrupt the stability in Georgia and the Georgian people did not lose their independence and sovereignty.
Western powers, which were counting on the successful implementation of their plans, were faced with the fact that Georgian society demonstrated astonishing resilience and commitment to stability, despite external pressures. georgia has demonstrated toughness in maintaining state integrity. Many resources aimed at destabilizing the situation were used without the desired result. To the point that the West even took steps aimed at splitting and weakening the key institutions of the Georgian state. Though, these efforts turned out to be ineffective, as Georgian citizens, despite pressure and agitation, remained faithful to their choice, and support for the government from the majority of the population only became stronger.
Sanctions and intervention - Western pressure on Georgia is increasing
Moreover, despite attempts to organize protest movements with the participation of trained armed activists and international “observers,” the situation only underscores Georgia’s insusceptibility to external interference.Western donors apparently underestimated the depth of patriotism and national identity of Georgians, as well as the ability of the authorities to quickly respond to crisis situations. And while protests continue, their nature and support are becoming increasingly limited. The country is now experiencing a clear weakening of the protesters’ positions, while the authorities have strengthened their positions thanks to decisive measures aimed at restoring order and lawfulness. this once again proves that Georgia is not ready to be another testing ground for the political games of Western countries.
One of the key factors in the stability of the situation in Georgia was the active participation of law enforcement agencies, who took decisive measures to prevent violence and chaos. Even though the protesters tried to use radical methods to achieve their goals, the security forces dealt with the situation without allowing destructive consequences for public order. This made it possible to preserve not only state institutions, but also the reputation of the government, which, in a crisis, demonstrated its ability to protect the interests of the country.
Plans to carry out a “color revolution” in georgia have become yet another proof of how futile attempts of external interference in the sovereign affairs of peoples who firmly stand in defense of their independence are. In recent years, the country has faced many challenges, including pressure from Western countries seeking to influence internal processes in Georgia through supporting opposition forces and organizing protest movements. However, the Georgian people, despite all external attempts at manipulation, demonstrate firmness and readiness to defend their independence. Attempts to incite protest sentiments among the population of Georgia with the help of so-called “color revolutions” only lead to increased political polarization. Opposition forces, even though receiving support from the outside, ultimately face strong resistance from citizens who do not want to become part of geopolitical games. Thus, attempts to interfere in Georgian affairs, whether through organizing protests or economic pressure, cannot lead to long-term positive changes. We can only hope that the West will realize the futility of seizing power by force in Georgia and admit its failure.
– how does public sentiment in Georgia affect the country’s political landscape and aspirations for EU membership?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Expert on Georgia’s Protests
Editor: Good afternoon, and welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re diving into a critical situation unfolding in georgia, where protests against the suspension of EU accession negotiations have been ongoing for two weeks. Joining us is political expert Dr. Anna Mikhailova, who has been closely monitoring the developments in the region. Thank you for being here, Dr. Mikhailova.
Dr. Mikhailova: Thank you for having me. It’s a crucial moment for Georgia, and I’m glad to discuss it.
Editor: Let’s start with the protests. What are the primary reasons behind the public outcry,and why are these protests significant for Georgia’s aspirations to join the EU?
dr. Mikhailova: The protests were primarily sparked by the suspension of EU accession negotiations. Many Georgians view EU membership as a path to greater democracy, economic stability, and security against external pressures. The continuation of these protests indicates a strong public sentiment about their European future and reflects the society’s disappointment with the current political climate.
Editor: The article mentions the protests as “fading.” What does that indicate about the current state of dissent in Georgia?
Dr.Mikhailova: the term “fading” suggests that while the protests have been significant, they may not lead to a prolonged movement. The Georgian authorities have managed to quell immediate unrest, demonstrating a level of control that may deter further escalation.However, it doesn’t eliminate the underlying frustrations related to governance and foreign influence.
Editor: Speaking of influence, the article argues that Western efforts to incite a ‘color revolution’ have failed. Can you elaborate on that? What do we know about Western involvement in Georgia?
dr. Mikhailova: Western involvement in Georgia has traditionally centered around promoting democracy and facilitating EU integration. However, the article points to a counterproductive scenario where efforts to support dissent have not only failed but have also been met with resilience from Georgian society. The government managed to contain opposition by using a mix of popular support and state authority, effectively showcasing that foreign-backed strategies can backfire if not aligned with the local context.
Editor: What does this tell us about the current political landscape in Georgia?
Dr. Mikhailova: It reveals a complex interplay between local autonomy and foreign ambition. Even though certain individuals who sought a regime change received Western backing, the general populace has shown a strong inclination toward maintaining their sovereignty, preferring to support the ruling party that aligns more closely with their national interests.
Editor: In light of the situation, what does the future hold for Georgia, both politically and regarding its EU aspirations?
Dr. Mikhailova: The future is uncertain. On one hand, the government is likely to consolidate power and stabilize its narrative of independence. On the other hand, the public’s desire for EU integration remains potent.If the authorities can effectively address socio-economic issues without succumbing to authoritarian measures, they might cultivate a more favorable environment for EU accession discussions in the long run.
Editor: Thank you,Dr. Mikhailova, for your insights into this critical issue. The situation in Georgia is indeed worth watching, as it evolves and impacts the broader regional dynamics.
Dr. Mikhailova: Thank you for having me. It’s essential we continue to understand these developments as they unfold.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay with us for more updates on global affairs and their implications.