The written order of the case against the physical remand of Azam Swati issued after the court time

by times news cr

(Ihtsham Kayani) Islamabad High Court has issued a written order against former federal minister and senior leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Azam Swati against physical remand after court time.

Grandson of Azam Swati’s lawyer submitted an affidavit regarding physical remand at 6:30 p.m. Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain was asked for an explanation on the affidavit of Azam Swati’s grandson yesterday.

In the order issued by the Islamabad High Court, it is stated that the affidavit should be placed before Judge Abul Hasnat Zul-Qarnain and he should give his comments on it. The comments of Judge Abul Hasnat Zul-Qarnain should be placed before this court tomorrow. They were registered on October 5 and they were arrested on October 5. Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain granted physical remand on October 28 in the said FIRs.

Azam swati physical remand case  by Tufail Ahmad Hasanzai on Scribd

The order said that it is the petitioner’s case that when he was arrested on October 5, separate remand should not have been granted in each case.

According to the court, the Prosecutor General did not appear in the court and was summoned by the court official. The Prosecutor General appeared in the court and told that he did not receive the court notice. How could the notice issued two days ago not be received?

Also read: 190 million pound reference; The NAB prosecutor raised objection to the unnecessary questions of the lawyer



Interview ⁢between Time.news Editor (TNE) and Legal Expert (LE) on Azam ‌Swati’s‍ Case

TNE: Good afternoon, and welcome.‌ Today we have with us legal expert Dr. Sarah Malik to discuss ‍a significant ⁣recent ruling from the Islamabad High Court regarding former minister Azam Swati. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Malik.

LE: Thank ​you for having me. It’s a ⁣pleasure to be here.

TNE: To start off, can you‌ explain what led to​ this recent order from the Islamabad High Court concerning Azam Swati’s physical remand?

LE: Certainly. The Islamabad High Court issued a written order concerning Azam Swati after a physical remand was granted earlier⁢ by Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain. Swati had been arrested on October 5, and the affidavit submitted by his grandson raised ‍questions about⁤ this remand. ‌The court is now reviewing the‌ affidavit to determine its implications.

TNE: What does the affidavit entail, and why is it ​significant in this ⁣context?

LE: The ⁢affidavit submitted⁢ by Swati’s grandson⁣ seeks clarification on the legality and procedures surrounding the physical remand granted. It suggests that there⁣ may be concerns‍ about the due process followed in the case. This is significant because it brings into ⁤question not just the current status of Swati but also the broader legal ‌framework regarding remands‍ in Pakistan.

TNE: ‌ The order mentioned that Judge Zulqarnain ⁢should provide ⁤comments on the affidavit before the next court session. What does this process look like from a legal‌ standpoint?

LE: The court requires Judge Zulqarnain’s ⁣comments to ensure that the higher ​court has all necessary information before making a ruling. This process emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation and ​transparency in judicial proceedings. It allows for a check on ⁢potentially arbitrary decisions made at the ⁢lower level,‍ which is ​a fundamental aspect of judicial review.

TNE: ‍Some might ⁤see the political dimension in Azam Swati’s case, given his ⁢status as a senior leader of PTI. How do you see the intersection⁣ of law and politics in this situation?

LE: The intersection⁢ is quite pronounced in⁤ Swati’s case, as his political⁢ affiliation could influence both public perception and judicial proceedings. Politically charged cases often ‍face more scrutiny, and judicial outcomes can have ramifications⁣ beyond the courtroom, affecting political dynamics. What’s crucial here is that the legal ‍principles remain upheld despite any political ‌pressures.

TNE: What⁢ should we expect going forward in ​this case? Are ⁣there‌ implications ⁤for other similar cases within the political landscape of Pakistan?

LE: Going forward, we can expect the Islamabad⁣ High Court ‍to take a close‍ look at Judge Zulqarnain’s comments and ​the legality of the remand. If the court finds irregularities, it might set a precedent‍ for⁢ how such cases are handled ⁢in the future,‌ especially for other‍ politicians⁤ facing scrutiny. It could ⁣reinforce the need for adherence to⁢ legal protocols⁣ in ⁢politically sensitive​ cases.

TNE: Thank you, Dr.‌ Malik, for ​your ​insights. This situation ⁤certainly highlights⁣ the complexities at the‍ intersection⁤ of law and politics in Pakistan. We look forward to more developments in this case.

LE: Thank you ‍for having me. It’s ⁢crucial that we ⁣continue‍ to monitor such ⁤developments closely.

TNE: That⁣ wraps up our⁤ discussion for‍ today. Stay ⁢tuned⁢ for more updates on Azam Swati’s case and its implications for the political landscape.

You may also like

Leave a Comment