Wednesday, 14 October 2026NewsWorldBusinessTech
Latest

Thélyson Orélien Denies AI Use in Novel Despite Past Plagiarism

Quebec author Thélyson Orélien is denying allegations that he used artificial intelligence to write his bestselling debut novel, C’était ça ou mourir, while admitting to past plagiarism in his early literary work. The controversy led the Académie Goncourt to drop the book from prize contention in September 2026.

Orélien Denies AI Use As Novel Faces Scrutiny In France

Before the scandal erupted in September 2026, the book had sold more than 35,000 copies in French bookshops, won the Prix du roman Fnac, and emerged as a strong contender for the Prix Goncourt, France’s most prestigious literary award. Beleaguered Haitian-Canadian author Thélyson Orélien has issued a strong denial of accusations that artificial intelligence generated his acclaimed debut novel, C’était ça ou mourir, which translates to It Was That or Die.

The novel follows a teacher escaping gang violence in Haiti’s Port-au-Prince on a journey across North America to arrive in Quebec.

The controversy ignited on September 21, 2026—the very day the novel won the Fnac prize—when an anonymous X account shared excerpts tested through an AI detection program called Pangram, claiming the text was 100 per cent generated by AI. Canadian academic Kevin Bryan, an associate professor at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management who specializes in AI models, told The Globe and Mail that he recognized telltale literary patterns and argued Pangram is highly accurate for long passages. Conversely, Agence France-Presse reported that its own AI verification system indicated a high probability that the novel was written by a human.

“It is slander and heresy. I made use of tools for research purposes. But I did not generate a single sentence of the book with a machine, all the more so given the foreign idioms used. The meaning and structure of the story come straight from my gut.”

Thélyson Orélien, via Agence France-Presse

In a statement distributed by his Montreal publishing house, Éditions du Boréal, Orélien explained that he began drafting the text at his table in Laval, Quebec, in 2017, completed a 300-page first draft in 2019, and subsequently spent years cutting scenes, reworking passages, and changing characters. Renaud Roussel told Radio-Canada’s Tout un matin that Boréal first received the manuscript in September 2025 and chose to trust the author over detection software, stating, Between the machine and the author, I choose the human’s words.

Author Admits To Past Plagiarism In Early Canadian Writings

Following the AI controversy, La Presse launched an investigation into his earlier journalism and short fiction, uncovering multiple instances of borrowed material. While vehemently denying the AI allegations regarding his novel, Orélien openly conceded to past intellectual property violations involving texts published in Canada during the early part of the last decade.

His award-winning 2012 short story Où va le monde contained passages taken from Le matin des magiciens, a 1960 book published in English as The Morning of the Magicians by Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier. Additionally, a 2013 commentary about heroes published in La Presse appeared to be a translation of an English-language article from the Philippine Star in Manila.

Orélien apologized for what he characterized as unacceptable mistakes from his youth, explaining that after leaving Haiti in his 20s, he was in a rush to establish himself as a writer in Canada and failed to recognize what he still needed to learn.

Thélyson Orélien Denies AI Use in Novel Despite Past Plagiarism
Photo: todoalicante.es

Admiration does not give me the right to take — to claim as my own — texts that were not mine, he wrote, offering unreserved apologies to the authors whose phrasing he borrowed.

French Literary Establishments React To The Controversy

The Académie Goncourt removed C’était ça ou mourir from its list of finalists for the season’s awards, citing both the suspected use of artificial intelligence and the revelations of past plagiarism. The unfolding controversy swiftly impacted the author’s standing across the European literary establishment. A Quebec book fair dropped him as its guest of honor while his publisher temporarily suspended promotional activities.

The debate over the novel also exposed cultural fault lines in France. Conservative intellectuals took a much harsher stance against perceived intellectual fraud. Despite the removal from the Goncourt list, the novel remains in contention for several other major French literary prizes, including the Prix Renaudot, the Prix littéraire de la Porte Dorée, and the Prix Médicis, while booksellers note that commercial sales have benefited from public curiosity surrounding the dispute.