2024-06-27 08:59:25
Stiftung Warentest assessments diving circumstances and waterproof mobile phone circumstances that can help you take photographs underwater. The consequence: some fashions produce good photos. However just one case is simple to deal with. Discover out which one it’s right here.
Crucial issues at a look
Anybody who has ever been snorkeling or diving will definitely know the sensation of desirous to seize the view underwater. No surprise, as a result of there are some improbable photograph alternatives ready underwater. You do not essentially want an underwater digital camera to take photographs, it’s also possible to seize the themes along with your smartphone whether it is in a diving housing.
That is precisely what Stiftung Warentest has now taken a more in-depth have a look at for the “check” difficulty 07/2024. Strong underwater housings, so-called onerous circumstances, and mushy, waterproof mobile phone circumstances for the seaside and sea have been examined. We present you all the outcomes and the check winner right here.
Waterproof cell phone circumstances examined: That is how Stiftung Warentest assessments
Within the check within the “check” difficulty 07/2024, seven diving housings for smartphones and two waterproof mobile phone circumstances are subjected to an in depth examination. The check gadgets used are a Samsung Galaxy S22 (Android) and an iPhone 14 from Apple (iOS). A water-proof compact digital camera can also be used to match the pictures.
The consultants consider photograph and video recordings above and under water. To do that, they {photograph} and movie a check board with totally different coloured objects utilizing the principle, wide-angle and – the place attainable – telephoto digital camera of the smartphones. The dealing with and stability of the waterproof mobile phone circumstances are additionally examined.
The outcomes of the cell phone case check at a look
The check winner within the cell phone case check is the mannequin SportDiver Smartphone Housing SL400-U von SeaLifeThe case obtained an total score of “good (1.8)” from the testers and, along with good recordings and good dealing with, it additionally presents excellent stability. Second place goes to the onerous case with an total score of “good (2.3)”. Seatouch 4 Max by Divevolk. The recordings and stability of this mannequin are every rated as “good”, however when it comes to dealing with the case solely achieves a passable score.
The “check” high quality score of “passable (2.6)” is barely worse for the Seapal Case by Marke Joby The Shellbox-Case delivers good photographs and prices lower than 40 euros. Dealing with and working this mannequin are sophisticated, nevertheless. Nonetheless, the testers suggest it for preliminary pictures makes an attempt.
The mushy, waterproof mobile phone circumstances examined are cheap and appropriate for defense in opposition to sand, water drops and deeper water, however they don’t produce usable diving photographs and make utilizing the mobile phone by the case virtually not possible.
The check consequence: The SL400-U housing from SeaLife obtained the highest score of “good (1.8)” from the testers and, along with good recordings and good dealing with, additionally impresses with excellent stability.
Product particulars: The case is 13 centimeters deep, 21 centimeters excessive and 6 centimeters thick. It weighs 669 grams and, based on the producer, can be utilized at a most water depth of 40 meters. With a median worth of round 290 euros, it is among the costlier fashions examined.
The battery-operated Sealife mannequin is the diving case with one of the best dealing with within the check. The mobile phone could be inserted securely utilizing rubber inserts and a stress spring. It’s managed utilizing the case buttons and the related app. The shutter works effectively, and the mannequin additionally scores factors with its vacuum pump for attachment, leak check and leak alarm.
The check consequence: Second place goes to the Seatouch 4 Max onerous case from the producer Divevolk with an total score of “good (2.3)”. The recordings and stability of this mannequin each obtained a partial score of “good”. By way of dealing with, nevertheless, the case solely obtained a partial score of “passable”.
Product particulars: The mannequin is akin to the check winner case from SeaLife. It has the same measurement at 12 x 23 x 4 centimeters, however is barely cheaper than the check winner at a median of 249 euros. It’s greater than 200 grams lighter and doesn’t require batteries.
Due to a liquid-filled movie on the case, the smartphone could be operated straight by way of its personal touchscreen when the case is underwater, which the testers highlighted as a optimistic. Solely the directions to be used and operation with diving gloves have been rated “passable”. In keeping with the producer, it may be utilized in water as much as 60 meters deep, a worth that’s considerably greater than the test-winning mannequin.
The check consequence: The SeaPal case obtained an total score of “passable (2.6)” and simply missed a “good” total score. The recordings and stability are “good”, however the dealing with was solely given a “passable” score. It’s because there aren’t any German-language directions and it’s also troublesome to make use of with diving gloves.
Product particulars: The mannequin measures 14 by 24 by six centimeters and weighs 577 grams. It may be utilized in waters as much as ten meters deep.
The testers criticize this mannequin for the truth that the directions are solely accessible however are temporary and solely in English, and that it’s a actual battle to make use of it with diving gloves. With a worth of round 250 euros, the mannequin is extra within the center vary, however can solely be used at depths of as much as ten meters, which is considerably decrease than the values of the fashions from Divevolk and SeaLife. By way of recordings, the case receives the identical total score of “good (2.0)” as its two predecessors.
The check consequence: The ShellBox case obtained an total score of “adequate (3.6)” within the check. It delivers good photos and passable stability. Nonetheless, its dealing with was solely rated as “adequate (4.2)”.
Product particulars: With dimensions of 11 by 20 by 4 centimeters and a weight of 332 grams, the mobile phone case is akin to the opposite fashions examined. When used at a most water depth of 15 meters, it can not sustain with the 2 fashions rated “good”, however it nonetheless surpasses the Joby mannequin.
The ShellBox case produces good photographs and prices solely round 40 euros. It’s troublesome to arrange and solely satisfactory to deal with, however the telephone could be operated to a restricted extent by way of the movie on the case. Because of the low worth, the testers suggest this mannequin to all customers who wish to strive underwater pictures for the primary time.
Conclusion of the cell phone case check
You do not essentially want an underwater digital camera to take photographs; it’s also possible to take photographs along with your smartphone if it is in a diving case. Of the seven waterproof mobile phone circumstances examined by Stiftung Warentest, only some produced good photographs.
Our tip: The check winner SportDiver smartphone case from SeaLifeThe case obtained an total score of “good (1.8)” from the testers and, along with good recordings and good dealing with, it additionally impresses with its excellent stability. At round 290 euros, the mannequin is sort of costly, however presents very passable efficiency.
When you’ve got by no means taken underwater photographs earlier than or are simply serious about getting a water-resistant telephone case for a number of snapshots in your subsequent trip, this may very well be Shellbox-Case may very well be one thing for you. It delivers good photographs and prices lower than 40 euros. Dealing with and working this mannequin is sophisticated, however the testers suggest it on your first pictures makes an attempt.
Issues to learn about waterproof telephone circumstances
Many smartphones are actually waterproof. It’s affordable to imagine that this characteristic is adequate to take good photographs and movies underwater. There’s nothing unsuitable with this in precept if you wish to dive in and take a snapshot. Nonetheless, sea salt and excessive water strain may also injury waterproof smartphones, so a water-resistant mobile phone case is at all times worthwhile if you wish to discover higher depths or take your telephone into the ocean extra typically.
The standard of your photographs depends upon the waterproof telephone case you select. Within the check, most fashions produced good photographs, particularly the onerous circumstances. Solely the mushy telephone circumstances have been disappointing when it comes to picture high quality.
In any case, it’s price taking diving photographs at eye degree or diagonally upwards and, for instance, within the noon solar, as a result of then the underwater world is greatest illuminated.
To match the waterproof mobile phone circumstances with the waterproof ones, the testers from Stiftung Warentest additionally checked out a water-resistant compact digital camera: the OM System Robust TG-7.
The consequence: It does not fairly match the digital camera efficiency of present premium smartphones, however it’s simple to deal with. At a worth of round 550 euros, it’s costlier than the entire waterproof mobile phone circumstances examined, however it’s another for anybody who does not have a smartphone with a high-end digital camera.