Today, the government adopted a draft that repealing the Act on Central Retirement Information (No. from the list – UD78). Thanks to her, citizens were to obtain information about their pensions in one place. However, the Ministry of Digitization decided that this would not be a good solution, especially since it was the Social Insurance Institution that conducts educational activities regarding saving for retirement, and besides, central information was to cost a lot (PLN 27.5 million in 2025).
The project, however, provides that We will be able to check what retirement we will get in the MOBKATI application. People who want to find out about the future retirement will enter the MOBIATR application, which will then redirect them to the MZUS application.
Earlier, the authors of the initiative were checked with Rafał Brzoska demanded that in one place all information about retirement could be checked, scattered today in ZUS, OFE and PPK.
The amendment adopted by the government will now go to the Sejm. It is to come into force after 14 days from the date of publication in the Journal of Laws, but the new function in the mobile is expected to appear at the beginning of 2026.
Will facilitate inheritance and donation tax
The government also adopted a project to deregulation of inheritance and donation tax (Uder19). He assumes a facilitation for taxpayers who inherited, for example, a flat from a member of the immediate family and took advantage of the exemption from inheritance and donation tax, and then want to sell them.
Currently, in this case, the taxpayer must obtain a certificate from the Head of the Tax Office confirming that he has benefited from the exemption. Project adopted by the government assumes the liquidation of the obligation. The heir who wants to sell, for example, a flat, will not have to apply for a certificate from the head of the tax office.
The same project also provides for a second change.
Currently, as a result of a resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court of March 31, 2025 (reference number III FPS 5/24), taxpayers must submit a tax return taxation and donations every time they get a repetitive benefit, e.g. a pension installment. This means that they would have to submit tax returns every month. MF suggests that The testimony could be submitted in such cases basically once and not every month.
The amendment is to enter into force 14 days from the date of publication in the Journal of Laws.
See also: Important changes for taxpayers, doctors and divorces. The government “for” deregulation
Restructuring and bankruptcy proceedings will be improved?
The government adopted a draft amendment to banking law (UDER11). He assumes that banks and jumps will be able to provide information covered by a bank (or professional) secret to a trustee and a court supervisor or manager, i.e. for restructuring and bankruptcy organs.
Currently, as indicated by the Ministry of Finance (the author of the project), there are no provisions that would clearly allow banks (and jumps) to provide information covered by banking secrets (and professional secrecy in the case of SKOK) to the bodies of restructuring proceedings (court supervisor, manager) and bankruptcy organs (trustee). As a result, e.g. a trustee cannot obtain information on the debtor’s bank accounts, because the bank or cooperative saving and credit union has no legal basis to disclose data covered by banking secrecy (or professional secrecy). This causes the extension of the bankruptcy proceedings (at the stage of determining the bankruptcy estate) and may reduce the amount that creditors will get.
After changes, banks and jumps are to provide information to restructuring and bankruptcy bodies, but only to the extent necessary to perform activities in these proceedings.
The changes are to come into force after 14 days from the date of announcement of the amendment in the Journal of Laws.
What will be easier for closed investment funds
The Council of Ministers also adopted a draft amendment to the Act on investment funds and managing alternative investment funds (UDER18). It provides for a facilitation for investment funds (TFI), which act as bodies for non -public closed investment funds (NFIZ). Facilitating will consist in the fact that such funds that have one common TFI body will be able to merge easier. Today, the meeting of investors of both funds (acquired fund and the acquiring fund must agree to such a merger, and in the case of a merger by the creation of a new investment fund – the assembly of the acquired fund investors). Not only that, consent to the connection must be collapsed by a 2/3 of votes (the total number of investment certificates of a given fund), which is difficult to achieve and makes calling difficult.
The project involves alleviating the requirements regarding the connection of non -public FIZ. In practice, it is three stages of voting on the merger of funds.
First of all, the voting threshold will be reduced from 2/3 to “more than half”. Secondly, if a participants representing no more than half of the total number of investment certificates of a given fund will vote for the resolution on the merger of NFIZ, TFI will have another chance, because it will be able to convene further assemblies of investors. Thirdly, if the investors’ assembly is convened twice and the participants representing no more than half of the total number of investment certificates of a given fund will vote, and the consent to the merger will be granted, if the votes behind the merger cast more than half of the participants present or represented during each vote.
Changes in this area were demanded by the participants of the initiative, i.e. the Deregulation Team led by businessman Rafał Brzoska. However, they demanded a complete abolition of the requirements. The government only agreed to limit.
The act is to enter into force 14 days from the date of publication in the Journal of Laws.
Which will change for investors in economic and PSI
The Council of Ministers also accepted the draft amendment to the PIT and CIT Act (UDER23 No.).
He assumes:
1) a change for companies that invested in the Polish investment zone (they obtained a decision on support) or a special economic zone (they obtained permission to zone activities). Basically, the benefit of investing in the zone is that the entity obtains CIT exemption (limit for use for up to 15 years). However, if the decision or permit is withdrawn, the company must even give all help, i.e. all tax exemption, even if it has not yet used it. The project predicts that An entrepreneur who has been withdrawn to support or permit would basically return only this help (tax exemption) he managed to use.
2) Public companies will not have to inform about their partners every year in a situation where the partners’ composition It has not changed.
3) Tax Capital Groups (PGK) will not lose the status of CIT taxpayer In the event that entities from PGK make transactions controlled with related entities outside the group on non -relief conditions. Today, such a transaction causes the status of a CIT taxpayer for PGK.
The amendment will enter into force of January 1, 2026.
Who will be able to submit pleadings in civil proceedings electronically?
The government also adopted a draft amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure and the Civil Code (UDER5 number). He predicts that Procedural letters in civil proceedings can be submitted via the information portal (PI) of common courts. Initially, lawyers, legal advisers, patent spokespersons, general prosecutors and prosecutors will use this. This obligation will apply to the pleadings specified in the Act (planned Article 1251 by. 2 kpc):
- notifications of termination of the power of attorney;
- notifications referred to in art. 136 parish 1, 4 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and art. 3871 k.p.c.;
- statements regarding consent to conduct mediation;
- applications for a remote meeting;
- appeals of complaints, complaints about the act of a court referendary;
- procedural letters in the course of proceedings caused by the appeal, complaint or a complaint about the act of a court referendary
- applications for delivery of the decision together with the justification of the appeal issued as a result of the examination of the appeal, a complaint or a complaint about the act of a court referendary, as well as letters supplementing the formal deficiencies of such a request.
Currently, in civil proceedings, only a court may serve court letters and other documents if the court has a copy of them in an electronic version. He then places their content in the portal functioning in common courts. Today, only one -sided communication is possible. And the Ministry of Justice proposes that to some extent it is possible to bring court letters in electronic form.
The problem is that today in civil proceedings there is basically no digital files, i.e. – as the ministry explains – the consequence of bringing letters through the information portal will be the need to print them to attach them to the case file. – This solution is temporary and will apply until the full implementation of the system of digital files (work on such solutions is ongoing) – says the Ministry of Justice.
According to the project, the catalog of entities that the court will be obliged to deliver correspondence via Pi on court bailiffs and permanent mediators will also be extended.
The project also provides that Some attachments will also be possible to court, bypassing the information portal.
The project also assumes changes in mediation. Pages of disputes in civil matters will be mandatory to mediate before the first meeting appointed for a hearing or preparatory meeting in economic matters resulting from construction works and closely related to the construction process of contracts for the performance of construction works.
Okay, here’s a fictional discussion reflecting the key takeaways from the provided article:
Setting: The Time.news office; editor Sarah is speaking with Dr. Jan Kowalski, an independent pension and financial security expert, via video call.
Characters:
Sarah (Editor): Time.news editor, focused on clarity and impact for the average reader.
Dr. Kowalski (Expert): Expert in pension systems and financial security
Dialog:
(Scene opens with sarah and Dr. Kowalski visible on screen)
Sarah: Dr. Kowalski, thanks for joining us today. We’re trying to make sense of this recent government decision in Poland to repeal the Act on Central Retirement Details. As I understand, it was meant to streamline pension information access for citizens. Can you give us the lay of the land regarding the current status in Poland?
Dr. Kowalski: Good to be here, Sarah.Yes, the Act on Central Retirement Information (UD78) was intended to be a one-stop-shop for citizens to access all their pension-related information. It aimed to consolidate data from various sources like ZUS,
