An important maya paradisewhich is characterized by be free of sargassum, could be off the cruise route due to new charge that is discussed in Mexico.
This initiative proposes that cruise passengers interested in disembarking on some Mexican coasts be charged at least 42 dollars from the 2025.
The charging of passengers on the different cruises that arrive at ports in Mexico was promoted by the government of Claudia Sheinbaum. This could have an impact on the route and disembarkation of cruise ships, the cost of which would rise to 70 dollars.
The sargassum-free Mayan paradise we are talking about is Mahahual, in Quintana Roo.
Mahahual, the sargassum-free Mayan paradise that would be left off the cruise route due to the $42 tax
Mahahual it is the destination of the so-called Sargassum-free Costa Maya that could be left out of the cruise route, since the cost to descend is significantly higher compared to other Caribbean destinations.
However, if the new charge of $42 for 2025 is approved, as discussed in the Senate, the cost will rise to reach $70 in Mahahual.
According to Michele Paige, general director of the Florida and Caribbean Cruise Association (FCC), Mexico will be left out of the market by placing 213% more expensive than the average cost charged in Caribbean ports to foreign cruise ships.
The important increase would have the following consequences:
- Mahahual will go from 19 to 61 dollars
Octavio de la Torre, president of the Confederation of National Chambers of Commerce, Services and Tourism (Concanaco Servytur) He said tenants are concerned about the proposal to impose new charges on foreign cruise ships.
“We have received requests from local merchants and businessmen through our Chambers requesting that we intervene before the competent federal authorities (…) and we trust that the measure will be extended,” said De la Torre.
With this initiative, the new charge would place the Mexican ports among the most expensive, affecting cruise tourism in the following areas:
- Cozumel
- Mahahual
- Puerto Vallarta
- Acapulco
- Ensenada
- Puerto Chiapas
- Port Progress
- Cabo San Lucas
Cozumel is the first smart destination in the Mexican Caribbean
Interview Transcript: Time.news Editor (Editor) and dr. Maria Rojas, Marine Environmental Expert (Expert)
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Rojas! Thank you for joining us today.We’re discussing an increasingly vital topic regarding the future of MexicoS coastal tourism, particularly with the recent proposal to introduce charges for cruise passengers disembarking at certain ports. Could you start by explaining the potential implications of this initiative?
Expert: Thank you for having me! This proposal could have several implications for both the environment and local economies. On one hand,introducing a charge could help manage the influx of cruise passengers,potentially reducing the environmental impact on these delicate ecosystems. On the other hand, it might deter tourists from visiting those ports, affecting local businesses reliant on cruise tourism.
Editor: That’s an interesting point. The proposal is also linked to the ongoing issue of sargassum, which poses a challenge for beach destinations. How does being free of sargassum enhance the appeal of certain Mexican coasts?
Expert: Absolutely, beaches that experience sargassum blooms can face critically important tourist backlash. When sargassum washes up on shores, it not only detracts from the visual appeal but can also create unpleasant odors and deteriorate the quality of the water. A ”sargassum-free” environment woudl likely enhance the overall experience for tourists, making those destinations more attractive and viable options for cruise itineraries.
Editor: So, in your view, could these charges potentially led to more lasting tourism in the region?
Expert: Yes, in a way. If the revenue generated from these charges is channeled into conservation efforts, local infrastructure improvements, and waste management, it could lead to a more sustainable model of tourism. Reduced foot traffic with charged access might also offer a reprieve for the ecosystems struggling under pressure from high volumes of visitors.
Editor: However, there’s also concern regarding how these fees could affect local communities economically, isn’t there?
Expert: Indeed! There’s a delicate balance to maintain.While the charges could provide funding for environmental initiatives, local vendors and businesses heavily dependent on cruise passengers might suffer if fewer tourists decide to disembark. It’s crucial for policymakers to strike a balance that supports both environmental health and local economies.
Editor: Speaking of policies, what measures could be implemented to ease the transition to this new charge while ensuring all stakeholders are considered?
Expert: Engaging with local communities and stakeholders in the decision-making process is essential. Implementing gradual fees, perhaps starting with discounted rates for locals or incentivizing extended stays instead of just day visits, could help. It might also be beneficial to create awareness campaigns about the environmental reasons behind the charges, emphasizing collective benefits.
Editor: Such a multi-faceted approach could lead to positive outcomes. But, final question—do you think this charge could set a precedent for other tourist destinations around the world facing similar challenges?
Expert: Absolutely! If successful, this initiative could serve as a model for sustainable tourism practices elsewhere. Many coastal regions grapple with the challenges of managing tourist influx while preserving thier natural habitats. Mexico’s approach might inspire global best practices that not only address economic needs but also prioritize environmental sustainability.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Rojas, for sharing your insights today. It’s clear that while there are challenges ahead, there are also opportunities for Mexico to lead in sustainable coastal tourism.
Expert: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure discussing such an important issue.