Thunder’s bench saves series: McCain’s 24 points lift OKC past Spurs in Game 3 comeback

by Liam O'Connor Sports Editor
How the Thunder Turned a 15-0 Deficit Into a 25-Point Lead

The Oklahoma City Thunder stormed back from a 15-0 deficit in Game 3 of the Western Conference Finals, winning 123-108 to reclaim home-court advantage in their series against the San Antonio Spurs on May 20, 2026. While the Spurs’ De’Aaron Fox and Dylan Harper returned to action, Jalen Williams was ruled out with lingering hamstring issues, forcing Oklahoma City to rely on bench depth—where Jared McCain’s 24-point explosion became the difference.

How the Thunder Turned a 15-0 Deficit Into a 25-Point Lead

The first quarter was a nightmare for the Thunder, who trailed 15-0 before the Spurs’ offense finally cooled. But what followed was one of the most dramatic comebacks in recent NBA playoff history. Oklahoma City answered with a 58-36 run in the second half, fueled by bench scoring from Jared McCain (24 points), Jaylin Williams (18 points), and Alex Caruso’s all-around excellence. The Thunder’s depth—six players scored in double figures—exposed the Spurs’ lack of secondary creators beyond Victor Wembanyama, who managed just 26 points and four rebounds after his dominant Game 1 performance.

How the Thunder Turned a 15-0 Deficit Into a 25-Point Lead
cluster (priority): The Ringer

According to The New York Times, the Thunder’s bench contributed 76 points, a staggering output that underscored how San Antonio’s offense struggles when Fox isn’t at full strength. “The real MVP might be Daryl Morey, who delivered Jared McCain at the trade deadline,” wrote Joel Lorenzi, a Thunder beat writer. McCain’s clutch drives and three-point shooting in the fourth quarter—when the Spurs needed stops—sealed the victory.

The Spurs, meanwhile, were left with questions about their offensive identity. Wembanyama, their franchise cornerstone, was held to 26 points on 8-of-15 shooting, a far cry from his 41-point, 24-rebound masterpiece in Game 1. The Thunder’s defense, led by Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (26 points, 12 assists), stifled San Antonio’s rhythm, forcing turnovers and limiting their ability to create easy looks. As The Ringer noted, the Thunder’s ability to win the turnover battle has been a defining factor in their success this postseason—and Stephon Castle’s 20 turnovers in the first two games only made that gap wider.

Injuries Reshape the Series: Who’s Playing, Who’s Not

The injury updates before Game 3 were as critical as the score. Jalen Williams, the Thunder’s second-leading scorer, was ruled out with a lingering hamstring issue that has plagued him all postseason. Williams, who played just 33 regular-season games due to recurring injuries, was held out after exiting Game 2 with tightness. His absence forced Oklahoma City to lean even harder on its bench, where McCain and Jaylin Williams stepped up.

Injuries Reshape the Series: Who’s Playing, Who’s Not
cluster (priority): The New York Times

For the Spurs, De’Aaron Fox returned after missing the first two games with a rolled ankle sustained in Minnesota’s semifinal-clinching win. Fox, who scored 15 points and dished out six assists in 31 minutes, was clearly not 100%, but his presence helped stabilize San Antonio’s offense. Dylan Harper, who had been sidelined with right adductor soreness, also played off the bench, contributing six points in limited minutes.

Spurs coach Mitch Johnson acknowledged the physical toll of the series, telling reporters, “I can tell you there’s games that people are playing right now that wouldn’t be playing in the regular season, and, so, that’s what I mean by different. I think there are levels of competitiveness and urgency and as of right now we’re at the height of that. So, you just try to make sure you keep some of these guys from themselves and their own competitiveness and desire to be out there because, again, their well-being is still the priority.” The quote, published by NBA.com, highlighted the fine line between pushing players to their limits and risking further injuries in a best-of-seven series where every game matters.

The Bench vs. the Big Three: Why Oklahoma City’s Depth Wins

The Thunder’s bench has been a defining story of this series—and not just because of McCain’s heroics. Players like Jaylin Williams, Alex Caruso, and Tre Mann have provided the offensive spark that keeps the Spurs guessing. In Game 3, Williams hit four three-pointers in the first half, including a go-ahead bucket that turned the game around. Caruso, meanwhile, was a defensive anchor and a secondary playmaker, something the Spurs have struggled to contain.

Thunder's Jared McCain sparks OKC's bench to take 2-1 series lead over Spurs | NBA on NBC
The Bench vs. the Big Three: Why Oklahoma City’s Depth Wins
cluster (priority): news.google.com

San Antonio, by contrast, lacks a true secondary scorer. While Wembanyama dominates the paint, the Spurs’ supporting cast—Devin Vassell, Keldon Johnson, and even Fox—struggle to create their own shots. The Thunder’s defense has exploited this by forcing them into contested mid-range attempts or turnovers. As The Ringer pointed out, the Spurs’ inability to generate consistent offense without Wembanyama at his best is a major vulnerability.

Oklahoma City’s depth also extends to its defense. With Williams out, the Thunder had to adjust their lineup, but the rotation remained versatile enough to disrupt San Antonio’s rhythm. The Spurs’ offense, which thrives on Wembanyama’s post-ups and Fox’s playmaking, has been exposed when those two aren’t at full strength. If the Thunder can continue to limit Fox and force Wembanyama into inefficient shots, they could extend their lead in the series.

What’s Next: Game 4 in San Antonio and the Road to the Finals

The series now shifts back to San Antonio for Game 4, where the Spurs will look to regain their footing after the Thunder’s statement victory. With Fox and Harper back in the lineup, San Antonio’s offense should improve, but the question remains: Can they generate enough scoring without Wembanyama carrying them?

The Thunder, meanwhile, will need to address their turnover issues, particularly from Stephon Castle, who has been a liability with the ball. If Castle can tighten up his handling, Oklahoma City’s defense could become even more stifling. The Thunder’s ability to win close games—something they’ve done consistently this postseason—will be tested again in Game 4.

Looking ahead, this series is a microcosm of the NBA’s shift toward depth and defense. The Thunder’s success has been built on their ability to out-defend opponents and rely on their bench, while the Spurs’ strength lies in their elite big man and young core. If the Thunder can maintain their defensive intensity and limit Fox’s impact, they could close out the series in San Antonio. But if the Spurs find a way to unlock their offense, this could turn into a true seven-game battle.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. The winner of this series will face the Eastern Conference champion—currently the New York Knicks, who are also navigating their own injury challenges. For the Thunder, a return to the Finals would mean another chance to defend their title. For the Spurs, a deep run would signal the arrival of a new dynasty in the making.

One thing is certain: The next few days will be must-watch television.

You may also like