WHAKATANE, June 20, 2025
Bridge Blues: A Critical Condition
Eastern Bay of Plenty transport operators are furious over the deteriorating surface of the Pekatahi Bridge, a vital link between the Port of Tauranga and the East Coast.
- The 100-year-old Pekatahi Bridge is in “critical” condition.
- Transport operators are complaining about the bridge’s surface.
- NZTA plans further repairs during the upcoming school holidays.
Is the Pekatahi Bridge in New Zealand unsafe? Transport operators are up in arms about the state of the Pekatahi bridge,describing it as “critical” and “insane” due to its terrible condition,which is causing major problems for thier businesses. The single-lane bridge, a century old, is a key part of State Highway 2.
Warren Sherborne, who runs WozHiab, stated the bridge’s condition has become “critical” despite frequent closures for repairs. Sherborne frequently transports portable buildings to Ōpōtiki and the East Coast. He described the experience as “like sending yoru little transportable home through an earthquake.”
Robert Monk, from Robert Monk transport, transports as many as 30 loads of export kiwifruit a day from the Eastern Bay to the Tauranga port. He said the bridge deck had gone “beyond a joke.” He added, “We’re getting shook to pieces on that bridge even though the guys are going slow.”
Sherborne explained that some of his loads are “quite fragile.” he said, “The bridge is rattling the absolute living crap out of them.We’re idling across the bridge in the lowest gear, taking up many phases [of the traffic lights] because we’re trying to look after our loads.” He added that he’s never seen the bridge in a worse state than now, and the recent closures “have been pointless.”
The Impact of a Crumbling Bridge
The bridge’s poor condition is causing real problems. Sherborne fears the safety of his loads, asking, “What if one of our loads was dislodged and came off after that bridge in transit and hurt someone?” He also worries about the damage to the bridge’s foundations from the vibrations of heavy vehicles.
Monk mentioned that he recently found a stainless steel screw in one of his truck’s tires, which is just one of many such instances. He had to pay $1200 for a call-out due to a flat tire caused by a screw. He stated, “I’m only a little company but I pay in excess of $1.5 million a year in road users tax. It’s unacceptable. I’m just ropable. It’s costing us a lot of money, and a lot of other transport operators. It is a disgrace.”
Monk highlighted the issue further by comparing it to his travel experiences. He said, “The roads I travel on, when in the Philippines, are far superior to this, and the Philippines is a so-called third world country. What does that say about New Zealand?”
Official Response and Future plans
NZTA Waka Kotahi has stated that the Pekatahi Bridge isn’t on the End of Life Bridge Register for replacement, as the timber and steel substructure is in good condition. However, design work is underway for a complete deck replacement, though construction relies on funding. Bridge replacements are prioritized based on age,condition,and traffic volume suitability; the Pekatahi Bridge doesn’t rank as highly as others across New Zealand.
NZTA waka Kotahi plans to shut the bridge for additional repairs during the upcoming school holidays,between June 30 and July 4. The industry is concerned about the effectiveness of thes repairs.
Dom Kalasih, chief executive of Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting new Zealand, stated that repairs only last a few days before failing again. Kalasih said, “Doing this several times a year looks like false economy, not to mention the additional freight costs related to the detour are in the order of $100,000 every day.” The bridge serves over 10,000 vehicles daily, with almost 1000 trucks moving goods. He finds it difficult to understand why NZTA doesn’t prioritize the bridge, even with a 20-minute detour available.
East Coast MP Dana Kirkpatrick agreed the situation was “deeply frustrating for everyone.” She met with NZTA on Tuesday, learning about the short-term maintenance, medium-term deck replacement, and long-term assessment of the bridge’s future. Kirkpatrick is encouraging the evaluation of whether spending $12-$14 million on resurfacing is the most cost-effective option.
Pekatahi Bridge: Weighing the Options
The pekatahi Bridge saga continues to unfold, wiht transport operators and local officials grappling with the implications of its deteriorating condition. The bridge’s persistent issues highlight the challenges of maintaining aging infrastructure and the financial and logistical burdens placed on those who rely on it. Dana Kirkpatrick, the East Coast MP, is questioning if the proposed resurfacing is the most cost-effective solution.
What caused the Pekatahi Bridge’s problems? The primary issue is the bridge deck’s degrading surface,leading to jarring rides for heavy vehicles and safety concerns. The original deck design and high traffic volume have expedited the deterioration. What’s being done now? NZTA is planning short-term repairs alongside evaluating long-term solutions,like a full deck replacement.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Resurfacing vs. Replacement
Kirkpatrick’s call for evaluating the $12-$14 million resurfacing plan is a crucial step in assessing the Pekatahi bridge’s future.The decision hinges on a cost-benefit analysis that weighs the short-term fixes against the long-term investment of a complete deck replacement. Several factors contribute to this calculation:
- The current condition of the bridge: Is the underlying structure sound, or are more important repairs needed?
- The lifespan of resurfacing: how long will the repairs last before further damage occurs?
- The impact on transport operators: What are the ongoing costs of detours, vehicle damage, and delays?
- The overall cost: Does the cost of repeated repairs exceed the cost of a more permanent solution and the negative impact on the local economy?
the cost of these ongoing issues is borne by various parties, including transport operators (who have to pay the detour charge), taxpayers, and the wider economy. As the bridge carries around 10,000 vehicles per day, including trucks, the economic consequences extend beyond individual transport businesses, affecting supply chains and overall productivity. The financial strain prompted MP Kirkpatrick to highlight the need for a value assessment.
Alternatives to “Band-Aid” Solutions
While short-term fixes can provide temporary relief,the bridge’s consistent need for repairs underscores the need for a sustainable bridge solution. A thorough assessment needs to evaluate several options, including:
- Deck Replacement: Replace the entire bridge deck, which includes the driving surface and supporting structure.
- Full Bridge Replacement: Consider a new bridge build, especially if the existing foundations require extensive work.
- Traffic Management: Implement strategies to reduce the bridge’s load, limiting heavy vehicle travel during peak times.
A successful approach goes beyond simple fixes; it must involve a thorough evaluation of the bridge’s long-term structural integrity. The ongoing financial costs and disruption emphasize the need for an efficient and comprehensive approach to ensure the movement of goods and services from the East Coast continues with a sustainable solution.
Case Study: Similar Bridge Challenges
Experiences from other regions offer valuable insights into managing aging infrastructure. In some areas, bridges with similar issues have undergone full deck replacements and even complete rebuilds to increase capacity and improve safety. These situations highlight the need for proactive maintenance and prioritisation of funding for long-term solutions. Transport authorities must consider the long-term financial implications.
FAQs: Pekatahi bridge
What are the current plans for the Pekatahi Bridge?
NZTA plans additional repairs during the upcoming school holidays, along with a comprehensive assessment of long-term solutions, including a potential deck replacement design.
How does the Pekatahi Bridge’s condition effect the local economy?
Damage to the bridge disrupts the flow of goods, increases transport costs for operators, and perhaps impacts supply chains, impacting both local businesses and consumers.
Table of Contents
