Many felt aggrieved when Donald Trump won the US presidency this week for a second time. There was also a parallel feeling of extreme astonishment at the American people’s attitude toward him, despite his disgusting personality traits, such as arrogance, arrogance, and moral and political indifference. Perhaps many were hoping for the victory of the Democratic candidate, Kamala Harris, in the hope of a change in American attitudes towards the world. Despite what many pretend to be disinterested in America and its affairs, what is happening there cannot be isolated from the political and economic developments in other countries. It is certain that the majority of the world’s people are uncomfortable with American policies, especially its continued pursuit of hegemony over world affairs and support undesirable political factions and parties. The American image has been linked to alliance with tyranny and occupation regimes on the one hand, and it has also been linked to the ugliest forms of capitalism under which the global economy is groaning, on the other hand. There is no political or military crisis without America having a connection to it. There is no unjust ruler or dictator who does not enjoy the support of Washington. As for the Arab world, it has another problem with America, which is its absolute support for the Israeli occupation and its commitment to protecting the security of “Israel.” He also knows that the Israeli entity practices its bullying and aggressive policies because it feels complete American protection.
Hence, public interest in the American elections resulted from a feeling of limited hope for the emergence of a figure culturally or ethnically separate from the familiar ruling class from which most American presidents descend. But this feeling has atrophied in recent years after Barack Obama ascended to the presidency for two full terms, but he did not bring about a change in American policies, nor did he depart from the familiar pattern of his predecessors, despite his non-white appearance and descent from a Muslim father. This experience was harsh, as Arabs, Muslims, and Third World people felt that it was useless to rely on successive American administrations, regardless of who the elected president was. There is a deep state that is fixed and does not change, and it directs the president’s paths and ensures his continuation within its fixed policies. Obama was the pinnacle of the “change” that could occur in the White House, and yet he was unable to bring about significant change. What could a woman who grew up and grow up in the atmosphere of the Democratic Party do, which cannot deviate from the American project one bit? If she wins and becomes President of the United States, will her policies and positions differ from Barack Obama? Therefore, rational people did not rely much on the possibility of her ascending to the presidency instead of Donald Trump. Trump has always focused on his economic achievements, but he repeatedly said that he avoided entering into any war during the four years of his first presidency (2016-2020). It is clear that his performance was not outstanding, as he failed to win a second presidential term, which was what his predecessors achieved.
America and the world, this is the topic that many are seeking to delve into after Trump’s victory. It is a thorny issue on the one hand, and an old and renewed issue on the other. America can contribute something to the development of life on this planet, but it linked its policies with the world on the basis of its close connection with the Israeli occupation, and thus it lost the role that it could exercise in the Arab world if it were not organically linked to the occupation. Its terrible silence regarding “Israel’s” practices and its failure to confront them when they crossed the limits by systematically assassinating Palestinian leaders diminished the glow of any future American role. There is no Arab or Islamic confidence in American policies that are completely biased toward the occupation, and people reject America because of its policies, especially its alliance with tyrannical and repressive regimes in the Arab world. These people do not expect a fundamental change in this policy during the era of President-elect Donald Trump, who is known for his affiliation to the American extreme right. Therefore, they do not find any room to rely on his presidency or that he will defend the oppressed, whether under occupation or in Arab prisons.
In terms of the turbulent political situation in Bahrain, there was an expectation that the Khalifa gang would come clean after decades of oppression, tyranny and injustice, apologize to the people and release all the prisoners unconditionally, as a prelude to radical political reform, but it failed in that, and is still insisting on Continuing its war against the people and the country. It always relies on external support for its survival, sometimes from Britain, sometimes from America, thirdly from Saudi Arabia, and fourthly from the Emirates. Its death is that all of these parties do not have their own decision making and their rulers do not guarantee their future, and that the peoples are the decision-makers, whether through election and vote or through revolution and rebellion. There is no survival of tyranny and oppression, and no ruler, no matter how ferocious and brutal, can eradicate the will for change in people, or eliminate their innate feeling of love of freedom and rejection of injustice and tyranny. In addition, the rise of Donald Trump may have convinced her that he would protect her from the anger of the people, and she thought that he was more focused on America’s internal conditions and economy.
What was revealed by the developments of the situation in Bahrain in recent months is that the Al-Khalifa gang lost the battle with the people, who remained steadfast in their position, insisting on working to achieve their political rights and restore the decision that the Al-Khalifa gang confiscated. Were it not for this continuous movement, the crimes of arrest and abuse of citizens would not have continued. Hardly a day goes by without the arrest of a few people demanding their rights and raising their voices for freedom and the right to self-determination. The flame of the revolution is still burning, and feelings of victory and victory dominate the citizens, especially those stationed in the squares. As for political prisoners, they are committed to the agenda of change despite the harsh conditions they go through behind bars. They are the spearhead in the existential battle through which the people seek to regain their identity, obtain their rights, and confront their enemies. As the killing and destruction continue in Gaza, the Bahrainis insist on standing with its people, defending them, chanting against the occupation and its supporters, and working diligently to bring down the Khalifa normalization project with the Zionist enemy. Therefore, the popular movement began to take two parallel paths: the first aimed to achieve freedom, rights and independence, and the second aimed to provide the maximum amount of psychological, moral and material support to the hungry people of Palestine. On both tracks, Bahrainis seem happier than ever. The Khalifa tyrant revealed his true face and showed his Zionism and bias towards the enemies of the nation, while the Bahrainis were satisfied with their fate, to always side with the oppressed and confront the oppressors, whether tyrants or occupiers. They stood with Palestine in the past and present, and the suffering of Lebanon and its people became, for them, an extension of the Palestine issue. Thus, they declared their bias once again towards the victims of Zionist terrorism that targeted symbols of resistance. Despite the Khalifa threats to the Bahrainis, the people of Bahrain ignored them and clearly announced their positions in support of the resistance. Nothing deters them from their principled positions, as they do not fear, in God’s name, the blame of the blamer. This has always been their habit since the first years of the Zionist occupation of the Land of Miraj, and it continued during the following decades. Standing with the enemies of the nation and humanity in their raging battles against truth, goodness, and justice is not a characteristic of honorable people, but rather an expression of a moral and ethical fall, and whoever does that will pay a heavy price. God gives respite and does not neglect, and do not think that God is oblivious to what the oppressors do.
Oh God, have mercy on our righteous martyrs, make them sincere with You, and release our prisoners, O Lord of the Worlds.
Ahrar Bahrain Islamic Movement
November 8, 2024
Title: America’s Political Landscape and Its Global Implications: An Interview with Dr. Samira Nasr, Political Analyst
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Nasr. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments in American politics and their global implications. This week, Donald Trump won a second term as the U.S. president, and many were left feeling aggrieved and astonished. What are your initial thoughts on the implications of his victory?
Dr. Samira Nasr: Thank you for having me. Trump’s victory undoubtedly reflects a divide within America, as well as a sense of disillusionment among those who hoped for a transformative leadership. Many wanted a shift from the status quo, which, unfortunately, has persisted regardless of who occupies the Oval Office. This longing for change, especially among marginalized groups, has not materialized in substantial policy shifts.
Editor: You mention a “sense of disillusionment.” How do you interpret this sentiment in relation to global perceptions of the U.S.?
Dr. Nasr: The global community has developed a complicated relationship with the U.S. Much of the world feels that American policies prioritize hegemony, often supporting authoritarian regimes to maintain control over global affairs. When Arab and Muslim populations, in particular, look to the U.S., they see historical support for policies that have perpetuated occupations and oppression, notably regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Editor: In your view, how does America’s support for Israeli policies affect its image in the Arab world?
Dr. Nasr: America’s unwavering support for Israel has severely tainted its image not only in the Arab world but globally. It has bred distrust and anger among those who face the brunt of oppressive policies. This support contributes to the perception that the U.S. is complicit in injustices and neglects the voices of the oppressed. With Trump’s administration historically siding with the most hardline views, it seems unlikely that any significant reforms will occur.
Editor: Many had hoped that Kamala Harris, as a woman of color with a background in the Democratic Party, would bring about change if elected. Given your analysis, why do you think these hopes were tempered?
Dr. Nasr: The hope for Harris arose from a desire for representation and change in leadership style. However, the reality is that the U.S. political environment is heavily influenced by established interests—often referred to as the “deep state.” Despite her background, Harris’s ability to deviate from established policies tied to imperialism and capitalism is a formidable challenge. History shows us that even those with transformative potential, like Barack Obama, struggled to implement meaningful changes.
Editor: Looking ahead, based on your assessment, what can we expect from Trump’s presidency regarding current global issues, particularly in the context of Arab nations?
Dr. Nasr: It appears that Trump’s administration will continue to follow the path of aggression and support for existing power structures. There is little indication he will promote democracy or human rights, particularly in the Arab world. Many countries, such as Bahrain, continue to grapple with oppressive regimes that rely on external support, which will likely persist under Trump’s leadership. The people’s movements will have to continue their resistance despite these challenges.
Editor: Speaking of resistance, you pointed out the ongoing political situation in Bahrain. How do you believe the people there perceive the Trump administration?
Dr. Nasr: The Bahraini people, like many others in the region, harbor skepticism towards the U.S. administration. They perceive America as aligning with oppressors rather than actively supporting their pursuit of rights and self-determination. The continuous protests in Bahrain reflect an enduring desire for change, and regardless of who is in power in Washington, the pursuit for justice cannot be quelled. The Trump administration’s focus on internal economic issues may lead Bahraini leaders to wrongly believe they can continue their oppressive tactics without consequence.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Nasr, for your insightful analysis. It’s clear that the implications of American leadership extend far beyond its borders, affecting hopes and realities in the Arab world and beyond. We appreciate your perspective on this critical topic.
Dr. Nasr: Thank you for having me. It’s vital we discuss these issues openly, as they shape not only global perceptions but also the broader quest for justice and human rights worldwide.