Trump pide a la Corte Suprema que suspenda prohibición de TikTok; Biden dice que la aplicación representa una amenaza “grave”

In a notable legal move, former President ‌donald⁣ Trump has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to delay the enforcement of ⁤a contentious TikTok ban set to take​ effect next month. In ⁣a legal filing, Trump argued that pausing the ban would allow his administration to pursue a negotiated ​resolution​ regarding the popular social media platform. This request​ puts him at odds with the Biden ‌administration, which has defended the ban citing serious ​national security concerns. The Supreme Court is set ⁢to hear oral arguments on this pivotal case, which questions whether the tiktok ⁢prohibition violates the First Amendment,‍ on January 10. As the debate intensifies, various groups and officials have submitted briefs to the court, highlighting the divisive nature of this issue.As the January 19 deadline for a nationwide TikTok ban approaches, President-elect Donald Trump ‍is urging the Supreme Court to delay the enforcement date. In ⁤a recent filing,⁤ Trump emphasized the need for his incoming ‍administration to negotiate a solution that addresses national security concerns while protecting the First amendment rights of millions of Americans. Despite previously mixed signals regarding TikTok, Trump has pledged to “save” the platform, ⁢following a meeting with its⁣ CEO. The bipartisan ban, approved⁢ by congress, stems from ongoing worries about the Chinese ‌parent company’s potential risks, including data collection and content manipulation.Former President Donald Trump has⁣ filed a significant brief with the Supreme Court​ regarding the controversial TikTok ban, asserting that he possesses a “powerful electoral ‍mandate” to address the issue. trump emphasized the First Amendment implications of the federal government’s potential shutdown of a social media platform used by 170 million Americans, warning that such actions could set a dangerous global precedent. Simultaneously occurring,the Biden administration,alongside ‌a bipartisan⁣ group of former ‌officials,urged the Court to uphold the ban,citing serious national security threats posed by TikTok’s ties to China,including concerns ​over data collection‌ and potential manipulation for⁢ geopolitical gains.In a significant legal development, ‍former President donald Trump has submitted‍ arguments to the Supreme Court regarding the contentious TikTok ban, highlighting the clash between national security and First Amendment rights. With 170 million Americans relying on TikTok for news and entertainment, Trump contends that ⁢the timing of the law’s ⁣enforcement could⁤ hinder U.S. foreign policy efforts and the protection of free speech. Notably, Trump’s administration previously raised concerns about the platform and attempted to impose restrictions,‌ which where ultimately blocked in court. Support for‍ the‌ Biden administration’s stance​ on tiktok also came from ‍former officials, including Jeff Sessions and Ajit Pai, emphasizing the ongoing debate over the app’s future ‍in the ‌U.S.TikTok is challenging the U.S. ⁢government’s attempts to ban the platform, ‍arguing that such actions threaten one of the most significant avenues for free speech in the contry.In a recent court filing, the company ‌emphasized that any​ restrictions on speech should be a‌ last resort, even in matters ⁣of national ⁤security. Civil liberties groups, including⁣ the ‍ACLU and the knight First Amendment Institute, have urged the Supreme Court to consider the implications of the ban​ on Americans’ rights to access ⁣foreign ‌content online. They argue ​that⁤ limiting access to foreign media is a tactic often associated with oppressive regimes, asserting that the government ⁣lacks a legitimate⁣ interest in preventing U.S. citizens from ⁢engaging with foreign discourse, irrespective of its nature.The american Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has raised ‌alarms over a potential “widespread disruption” to Americans’ online engagement if the Supreme court upholds ‌a recent ban affecting TikTok. Earlier this month, a federal appeals court in Washington unanimously supported⁣ the ban, citing national security‌ concerns as the government’s rationale for regulating the platform. The Supreme ⁢Court’s swift decision to review the case⁤ marks an unusual urgency,as TikTok seeks a temporary pause on the ban ⁤while challenging its constitutionality under the First ⁣Amendment.Meanwhile,D.John Sauer, nominated by former ‍President Trump⁣ for the role of Attorney General, ​has argued for a suspension of the law’s enforcement to allow⁣ for a negotiated resolution once Trump is in office. This ongoing ⁤legal battle‍ highlights the intersection of technology, free⁣ speech, and national security in today’s digital landscape.