FBI-hating Trump denies it for weeks
The acquisition team reached an agreement with the Ministry of justice… Not sure if it applies to all people
The FBI’s background checks are a long-standing practice to verify whether high-ranking goverment appointees are qualified to handle national security secrets, adn the Senate has referenced the results of the FBI’s background checks during the confirmation process.
Though,President-elect Trump,who extremely hates the FBI,has delayed the background check agreement.
Despite this agreement, it is unclear whether the Trump transition team will submit a full list of subjects subject to security checks or FBI background checks required for Senate confirmation.
The agreement did not clarify whether it would require Trump to require his appointees to undergo background checks by the FBI or require the FBI to begin investigating those who said they would undergo the checks.
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
Hot news now
How does the relationship between a president and the FBI impact national security?
Time.news Interview: FBI Background Checks and the Trump Transition
Editor: Good afternoon and welcome to Time.news. Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Emily Hastings, a former FBI agent and a current cybersecurity expert. Dr.Hastings, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Hastings: Thank you for having me! It’s great to be here.
editor: Let’s dive right into it. as you may know, President-elect Trump has been hesitant about the FBI background check process, delaying the agreement with the Ministry of Justice. What are the implications of this delay for high-ranking government appointees?
Dr. Hastings: That’s a crucial point. Background checks are vital for ensuring that those who handle sensitive national security information are qualified and trustworthy. Delaying these checks can create a risky environment, especially when transitioning to a new management. It raises questions about the security vetting process and can lead to potential vulnerabilities in national security.
Editor: It seems that there is ambiguity surrounding whether Trump’s transition team will provide a complete list of appointees for the necessary security checks. How does this uncertainty affect the Senate confirmation process?
dr. Hastings: Well, the Senate relies heavily on the FBI background check results during confirmation. If the transition team doesn’t submit a full list, it could slow down the confirmation hearings considerably. Senators may be reluctant to confirm appointees without clarity on their backgrounds, especially considering the responsibilities they’ll hold. This could lead to delays in staffing up critical positions within the government.
Editor: Trump’s feelings toward the FBI could complicate this situation further. Why is this relationship between a president and the FBI important for national security?
Dr.Hastings: the FBI serves a critical role in safeguarding national security, and trust between the agency and the executive branch is essential. If a president publicly criticizes or undermines the FBI, it can create a chilling effect on the agency’s work. Moreover,it can affect the morale of agents who are dedicated to their mission. Ultimately, for national security to be effective, there needs to be a collaborative relationship.
Editor: The agreement with the Ministry of Justice does not clearly indicate if Trump is required to mandate these background checks for his appointees. What might happen if he chooses not to enforce this?
Dr.Hastings: If he chooses to bypass these checks or not enforce them, it could have dire consequences. Unvetted individuals in key positions can pose important risks to national security. Moreover, it could also lead to public backlash and further deteriorate trust in the administration. the repercussions may not just be political—they could impact the integrity of policies and decisions made by those appointees.
Editor: Given all of this, what should be the main takeaway for citizens concerned about their country’s security during this transition?
Dr. Hastings: Citizens should remain vigilant and aware of the vetting processes and hold their elected officials accountable. It’s crucial to advocate for openness and ensure that national security is treated as a non-partisan issue. An effective democracy requires that checks and balances are maintained, especially when it comes to those entrusted with protecting the country’s interests.
Editor: Dr. Hastings, thank you so much for your insights today. It’s clear that the relationship between the incoming administration and the FBI during this transition will significantly impact the security landscape of our nation.
Dr. Hastings: Thank you for having me, and I hope we can continue to have these critically important conversations moving forward.
Editor: Absolutely. Thank you to our viewers for joining us. Stay informed and engaged. Until next time.