The rapper Boosie Badazz, whose real name is Torrence Hatch, paid $600,000 to a Washington lobbying firm to secure a presidential pardon for a firearm conviction, but the deal collapsed, leaving him seeking arbitration for half his money. This case highlights a broader trend: Trump’s use of pardoning power to enrich allies and consolidate influence.
A New Economy of Clemency
Reuters’ investigation found that Trump’s pardons increasingly relied on personal access and donations rather than Justice Department (DOJ) guidelines. Over 96% of second-term clemencies bypassed traditional rules like waiting periods or contrition.
The process involved “influencers” who facilitated 624 instances of clemency for 197 individuals. Some intermediaries demanded up to $2 million, though exact figures remain unclear. Roger Stone and Angela Stanton King, both pardoned, confirmed their roles in promoting candidates. Stone denied receiving payment, while Stanton King declined to comment.
Jan. 6 Pardons and Recidivism
Trump used his power to help roughly 1,500 rioters who helped him attempt to overthrow the government on Jan. 6, 2021 after he lost the 2020 presidential election. At least 12 of the pardoned rioters have since been charged with other serious crimes, including child molestation, assault, harassment, murder plots and charges related to a vicious dog attack,
The New York Times editorial board wrote. The editorial board warned that pardons would embolden the rioters by signaling that crime has no consequences.
The Role of Influence and Money
Reuters identified 290 “influencers” who leveraged personal narratives and donations to secure pardons. These figures included 110 Trump supporters, 11 of whom received pardons during his first term. The investigation noted that access to a close presidential ally changes the game, reducing reliance on bureaucratic procedures. The only driving forces are money, praise, a share of political support, and connections,
Ty Cobb said.
However, the scale of influence—exemplified by intermediaries demanding up to $2 million—has normalized a “new economy” where wealth dictates access to the White House.
Unanswered Questions and Future Implications
While the full extent of the pardon system’s influence remains unclear, the cases of Boosie Badazz and the rioters reveal a pattern of favoritism. The question of whether these pardons violated ethical norms—despite their legality—looms large. Reuters reported that since 2025 more than 1,700 people have been granted pardons or sentence reductions, and most of such decisions went through direct interaction with members of the president’s inner circle. How this legacy will shape future clemency decisions remains uncertain.
For now, the story hinges on a single, unresolved tension: the line between legal advocacy and unethical influence. As Ty Cobb put it, The only driving forces are money, praise, a share of political support, and connections.
Whether this system will persist or be reformed depends on who holds power in the next administration—and whether the public demands accountability for a process that prioritizes access over justice.
Keep reading
