Count the votes in the United States of America It was faster than expected and the victory of Donald Trump was confirmed with his victory in Wisconsin, which ensures that he has more than 270 voters and with him, the majority of the College to declare him the 47th president in the history of the North American country .
The Democratic vice president was also at the center of this struggle. Kamala Harris, who canceled his speech while his Republican rival already felt like a winner.
It was the first state to close its polls Georgiaat 7 pm Eastern time. Shortly after, at 7:30 pm, it was followed North Carolina. Both ends were crucial in setting the tone for the night. With the majority of voters having already cast their ballots early, it was expected that those first results would be reported quickly After the recount, the majority of votes were awarded to Donald Trump.
After winning the votes of these two hinge states, Trump led and the expectations were transferred to the states of the region of the “A wall Azul“: Pennsylvania, Michigan y Wisconsin.
The electoral battle would not be complete without highlighting the central role played by the so-called states “Blue Wall”. Historically, these regions have been decisive in the last presidential elections, and both Kamala Harris therefore Donald Trump consider Pennsylvania as a necessary state.
I Michiganwhere the polls closed at 9 pm Eastern time, there is a history that suggests that only half of the votes were counted before midnight in past elections, such as the 2020 and 2022 elections. Wisconsin He extended the count until early Wednesday morning and played a central role: the result guaranteed Trump’s total victory, the AP agency announced at 5:34 AM Eastern Time in the United States (10:34 AM GMT) .
Count the votes in the statesBlue WallIt is not a simple task, and it is an aspect that may affect how long it will take for the country to know the final result of the presidential elections. Pennsylvania It is probably the most prominent example of this challenge. Current state law does not allow election workers to begin processing mail-in ballots until Election Day. This includes not only opening envelopes, but also verifying signatures and preparing ballots for counting. As a result, the process can be extremely tough, and observers expect the count could extend well beyond Tuesday.
I Michiganthe authorities have introduced reforms aimed at speeding up the counting of votes, but there is no guarantee that this will completely resolve the delays. Previous experience shows that the state had difficulties in completing the count before midnightespecially in years of high voter turnout like 2020 and 2022. Although recent amendments may improve speed, results are expected to continue to come in gradually throughout the day on Wednesday.
Wisconsinanother swing state, it also had its own challenges. Although the polls closed at 9 pm ET, the state has experienced long counts in the past, and full results could take several hours. Additionally, as is common in states with significant use of mail-in voting, the process required to properly count each vote can cause delays.
Relying on post votes also plays a crucial role in western states, for example Arizona y Nevadawhere the polls closed at 9 pm and 10 pm Eastern, respectively. Both states have a history of relying heavily on mail-in ballots, meaning the count could go on for several days. In recent elections, this reliance has significantly delayed candidates and the public waiting patiently for accurate results. Now, with the national trend already confirmed, the process will only attract the attention of local applicants.
Title: The 2024 Election Aftermath: An Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Sarah Thompson
Setting: A sleek office at the Time.news headquarters, equipped with modern technology and soundproofing for an uninterrupted interview. The ambiance is professional yet inviting, perfect for an engaging discussion.
Time.news Editor (Mark): Good morning, everyone! Today, I’m thrilled to be joined by Dr. Sarah Thompson, a renowned political analyst and expert in electoral processes. Welcome, Sarah!
Dr. Sarah Thompson: Thank you, Mark! Excited to be here.
Mark: The 2024 U.S. presidential election has created quite a buzz. Donald Trump’s victory was confirmed earlier than many anticipated, particularly with his decisive win in Wisconsin. What are your thoughts on the speed of the vote count this year?
Dr. Thompson: It’s certainly notable! The efficiency of vote counting this election cycle was impressive. We’ve seen states like Georgia and North Carolina set the pace early on. States had prepared for this moment, likely learning from past mistakes. However, the complexity in the “Blue Wall” states, especially Pennsylvania and Michigan, made it clear that while we got some quick results, there were significant challenges.
Mark: Speaking of the “Blue Wall,” it’s historically been a critical battleground in elections. Do you think that Trump’s win in these pivotal states signals a shift in voter sentiment, or was it a unique circumstance for this election?
Dr. Thompson: That’s an excellent question. The “Blue Wall” historically favored Democrats, but it’s evident that Trump’s appeal was effective this time, particularly among certain demographics. His message on economic revival resonated with voters in these traditionally Democratic strongholds. However, there are deeper issues at play, including shifts in party alignment and voter behaviors, which could have long-term implications for future elections.
Mark: You mentioned challenges in vote counting, especially in states like Pennsylvania. With laws that prevent early processing of mail-in ballots until Election Day itself, do you see this as a structural issue that needs addressing?
Dr. Thompson: Absolutely. The laws in Pennsylvania and similar states underscore a significant problem in our election infrastructure. It creates unnecessary delays and can lead to confusion among voters. Election officials should be able to prepare in advance to streamline this process. If we want timely and accurate results, we may need to advocate for reform to allow for earlier processing of ballots.
Mark: As Trump was securing victories and Kamala Harris was evidently feeling the pressure, how does this dynamic play out for the Democratic Party going forward?
Dr. Thompson: The Democratic Party faces a challenging road ahead. While Harris remains a key figure, there’s been a growing conversation about the need for fresh leadership and new messaging to reconnect with voters. They’ll need to analyze what went wrong and how to reinvigorate their base. Additionally, addressing the concerns of the voters who switched allegiances could be crucial for future success.
Mark: With the election result highlighting the divided political landscape, what do you think will be the most significant issue for the new administration to tackle right away?
Dr. Thompson: Healing the political divide will be paramount. The next administration, whether under Trump or otherwise, must find ways to unite the country on critical issues like the economy, healthcare, and social justice. The polarization we’ve witnessed has not only affected political discourse but also societal relationships, and mending these should be a priority.
Mark: as we look ahead, what strategies should both parties employ to prepare for the next election cycle?
Dr. Thompson: Both parties need to engage with their constituents genuinely and consistently, addressing real concerns rather than political rhetoric. Building grassroots movements, utilizing data analytics for targeted outreach, and fostering discussions that include diverse voices will be essential strategies moving forward. Voter engagement should start the day after an election, not a few months before the next one.
Mark: Thank you, Dr. Thompson! Your insights are incredibly valuable as we navigate the repercussions of this election and look toward the future.
Dr. Thompson: Thank you, Mark! It’s been a pleasure discussing these critical topics.
As the interview concludes, the camera zooms out, capturing the dynamic exchange of ideas, leaving the audience in thoughtful contemplation of the future political landscape.