Yu. G. C by misinterpreting regulation F. D. The controversy started by saying that research period cannot be counted as teaching experience. Now you G. All the C regulations are thrown into the air and trampled only on the strength of some Right to Information Acts. In any case, I claimed some information and thought that the response was enough. But after seeing the agitation of fake newspapers and Asianetadi slanderous channels for the last two days, I felt that the falsehoods in some of the numbers which are being raised under the name of RTI should be exposed right now.
2. But how come there is such a huge difference in the numbers?
3. In Asan’s Sitakavya there is a verse that Sita says:
“People are drawn before-
Sarvabhaumiai to Nanumoda
How can I be despicable again
The day of human pregnancy?”
Yu. G. C. In terms of regulation, what happened here is almost like this. F. D. P. The period does not count as teaching experience. G. While arguing that C is in regulation, U. G. Regulation C was universal. With the legal advice that it was a wrong interpretation, the U. G. C. Regulation is frowned upon. U. without leaving any doubt that the research score should be used to prepare the shortlist. G. It has been said in C regulation that K. K. Ragesh U. G. C Chairman V. It is not because you said that you can make C, will you ever agree to it? Questions?
4. Research score after a certain cut-off was not taken into account in the past! If there were ten essays then, only five were marked. Even then, there was the possibility of the false accusation that the said interview had been marked up. This time Kannur University interview has been recorded online. Ask for the right to information and broadcast it on the channel. It does not mean that there is no channel judging anymore. I welcome it with no lack of confidence. It’s just that when you show it, you have to show it to everyone. Let me clarify this much for the time being. After and after.