The New York Times reported that the United States approved the use of long-range missiles in Ukraine as a response to North Korea’s deployment of troops to Russia.
According to this media outlet on the 18th (Korean time), U.S. President Joe Biden authorized Ukraine to use long-range missiles provided by the U.S. to attack the Russian mainland.
So far, the United States has permitted Ukraine to use only the High Performance Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which has a range of 50 miles (approximately 80 km), among the missiles provided by the United States.
However, President Biden’s action on this day allowed Ukraine to launch the Army Tactical Missile (ATACMS) with a range of 190 miles (304 km).
Ukraine is expected to use long-range missiles provided by the United States to defend Kharkiv.
Kharkiv is a city near the Ukrainian border, about 120 km away from Kursk, Russia, and is a place where fierce fighting frequently takes place.
Additionally, Kursk has been said by Ukrainian President Volodmir Zelenskyy to be an area where North Korean troops have been deployed.
Accordingly, it is highly likely that the long-range missiles approved for use by the United States will simultaneously target Russian and North Korean troops in the Kursk region.
There is also an interpretation that this strategy is President Biden’s goal.
It is said that President Biden decided on this measure to warn North Korea not to send any more troops.
Some in the United States are also concerned that approval to use this long-range missile may lead to retaliatory measures from Russia.
However, the NYT added that the U.S. government believes the possibility of Russian retaliation is low.
<!–BYLINE–
Reporter Wonju Lee [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- I’m angry
- 0dog
- I recommend it
- dog
- I’m sad
Hot news now
What are the key developments in the Ukraine-Russia war since its onset 1,000 days ago?
Title: An Exclusive Interview on the 1,000-Day Mark of the Ukraine-Russia War
Interviewer: Good morning, everyone! Welcome to Time.news. Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Elena Ivanov, a geopolitical expert with a focus on Eastern European conflicts. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Ivanov.
Dr. Ivanov: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Interviewer: As you know, we recently marked the 1,000th day since the outbreak of the Ukraine-Russia War. How do you assess the situation now as we reach this significant milestone?
Dr. Ivanov: The 1,000-day mark is indeed a poignant event. It highlights the persistent nature of the conflict, the resilience of the Ukrainian forces, and the international community’s involvement, especially from the United States. As we see, the addition of long-range missiles is a game-changer for Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.
Interviewer: Absolutely! The recent approval for Ukraine to use the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) is significant. What do you think about the implications of this decision by President Biden?
Dr. Ivanov: The approval of the ATACMS signifies a shift in U.S. support toward a more aggressive stance, allowing Ukraine to target deeper into Russian territory. This not only aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, particularly in areas like Kharkiv, but also serves as a warning to North Korea, which is reportedly deploying troops in the region.
Interviewer: That’s interesting. There is speculation that this could provoke a reaction from Russia. What’s your perspective on that?
Dr. Ivanov: There’s always a risk of escalation in military conflicts, but the U.S. government believes that the likelihood of immediate retaliation from Russia remains low. This could be attributed to Russia’s own challenges and the ongoing strains in their military operations, particularly as they face both Ukrainian forces and external pressures from the West.
Interviewer: Speaking of external pressures, how do you think this situation will impact the relationship between the U.S. and North Korea?
Dr. Ivanov: It’s a delicate balancing act. By permitting Ukraine to strike at strategic targets in Kursk, the U.S. is attempting to deter North Korea from escalating its involvement. However, this could also lead to a variety of responses from North Korea, which may feel emboldened to strengthen its alliance with Russia.
Interviewer: Considering the evolving strategy, especially regarding the coordination between Ukraine and the U.S., how do you see the conflict shaping up in the coming months?
Dr. Ivanov: I expect we will see an intensification of military engagements as Ukraine leverages its new capabilities. The focus will likely shift towards tactical applications of these long-range missiles. If managed effectively, it could be a pivotal moment for Ukraine in reclaiming lost territories. However, the risk of a broader conflict remains, as both Russia and its allies may respond aggressively.
Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Ivanov, for your insights. As we reflect on these past thousand days, it’s crucial to understand the shifting dynamics and the potential consequences moving forward.
Dr. Ivanov: Thank you for the thoughtful discussion. The path ahead is as complex as it is crucial for the future of Eastern Europe.
Interviewer: Thank you again for joining us today! We’ll continue to keep an eye on developments in this ongoing conflict. Until next time, stay informed!
Dr. Ivanov: Thank you! It’s always vital to stay vigilant and informed about such global issues.