Emory University Sued Over Medical Student’s Israel-Gaza Speech Suspension
Table of Contents
Umaymah Mohammad has filed an Emory Title VI lawsuit alleging discrimination after her suspension for remarks on Israel and Gaza, sparking a crucial free speech debate on campus.
Umaymah Mohammad, a medical-sociology dual degree student, has initiated a federal lawsuit against Atlanta’s Emory University, alleging discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, alongside additional complaints under Georgia state law. The complaint, filed Monday by the Council on Islamic-American Relations in Georgia (cair-Ga), centers on the university’s alleged “intentional discrimination and retaliation” during disciplinary proceedings last year that led to Mohammad’s suspension from medical school.
The lawsuit names Emory University, its board of trustees, and John William Eley, a dean at the medical school, as defendants. If prosperous, the legal action could substantially impact how universities handle student activism and free expression, particularly regarding discussions on the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Allegations of Discriminatory Disciplinary Action
Mohammad was suspended from medical school for one year, pushing her graduation to 2029, following disciplinary proceedings that included a November hearing. According to the lawsuit, these proceedings were “plagued by procedural irregularities, such as pressuring Plaintiff to admit guilt, altering charges, manipulating deadlines, disregarding institutional policies, and imposing disproportionate sanctions.” Despite these alleged irregularities, Emory found that Mohammad “violated ‘the standards and expectations of the medical profession’ and engaged in ‘unprofessional conduct’ by expressing her views on the Israel-gaza conflict.”
Keon Grant, an attorney representing Mohammad, stated that the lawsuit aims to demonstrate that the university’s actions were motivated by discriminatory intent. He emphasized that a favorable outcome could lead to “stopping disciplinary proceedings for protected expression – and that this becomes more of a policy moving forward” across universities.
The legal action unfolds amidst a charged national climate where Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from discriminating based on race, color, or national origin, is increasingly central to campus disputes. The current administration has notably wielded Title VI to address allegations of antisemitism on high-profile U.S. campuses,exemplified by a June 30 proclamation finding Harvard guilty of “acting with deliberate indifference towards harassment of Jewish and Israeli students.”
Keon Grant acknowledged the challenges posed by this new Title VI landscape, stating, “I definitely think the new Title VI world we’re living in is much more challenging.” However, he underscored the law’s enduring importance: “Still, it’s an important tool – not only to seek relief, but if no Title VI complaints were filed, it would lead to a kind of erasure.” Similarly, Azka Mahmood noted that the law is “now being weaponized to target student activism [on behalf of Palestine],” yet stressed the necessity of pursuing justice through the federal courts.
Emory’s History of Discrimination Allegations
The lawsuit highlights a past settlement Emory entered into with the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights during the early weeks of the Trump administration. This settlement stemmed from a Title VI complaint filed directly with the department in 2023. At that time, outgoing civil rights investigators found that Emory “may have contributed to and at a minimum appears to have failed to respond promptly or effectively to a hostile environment based on race and national origin, including shared Palestinian, Muslim, and/or Arab ancestry.”
This past finding, the lawsuit asserts, indicates that Emory “was aware of systemic issues in how Palestinian and Arab students were treated.” The university, with an endowment of $11 billion-the 11th-highest in the U.S. according to the Atlanta Buisness Chronicle-has not provided comment on the pending litigation.
Further complicating Mohammad’s situation, she was recently notified of an additional complaint filed regarding remarks she allegedly made on israel and Palestine. The school has not clarified the issue, but the probation she received as part of last year’s disciplinary proceedings means an additional complaint could now be grounds for expulsion, according to the lawsuit. The outcome of the Emory Title VI lawsuit will be closely watched as it sets a precedent for student speech rights and campus governance.
