State officials in the U.S. have cast doubt on claims by President Donald Trump that China hacked voter registration systems. According to reports from detroitnews.com and the Washington Post, officials in 12 of 15 named states say they were never notified of any such data breaches.
The controversy centers on a July 16 prime-time speech where President Trump alleged that voter data had been bought, stolen or hacked
. While the White House released declassified intelligence reports to support these claims, the actual responses from state election authorities suggest a different reality: the data China obtained was likely already public.
State Denials and the Lack of Federal Notification
Under standard protocol, federal law enforcement notifies state officials when a hack is discovered. However, officials in 12 of the 15 states identified in the White House intelligence reports as having compromised
voter rolls stated they received no such notification. Three states and Washington, D.C., did not respond.
The gap between federal claims and state reality is stark. In Florida, Gretl Plessinger, a spokeswoman for the Department of State, explicitly stated that Florida voter registration data has not been hacked, noting that the state’s voter file is available online.
Other states reported similar findings regarding the nature of the data. Matthew Clyburn, speaking for Connecticut Secretary of the State Stephanie Thomas, noted that the state’s registration system is not connected to the internet. He added that while the FBI has asked the office to review data found on the dark web, that information consistently matched publicly available data with no confidential information.
Intelligence Gaps and the 2022 Timeline
A task force reviewing the handling of foreign election interference recently repeated the claim that China and its proxies bought, stole or hacked
records, suggesting some data was not publicly available. Yet, the evidence provided by the task force may actually undermine the timeline of the 2020 election interference claims.
The task force pointed to a memo stating a Chinese CNE Actor
—shorthand for computer network exploitation—downloaded registration data for six states from commercial websites in January 2022. These states included Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Michigan, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island. Because this event occurred in 2022, it happened too late to have any bearing on the 2020 general election.
The memo noted that the hacker also attempted to access a specific voter registration application in Ohio. Ben Kindel, a spokesman for Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, stated that federal officials informed the office about 10 years ago that China might have accessed publicly available election data available to anyone with an internet connection.
Espionage vs. Election Interference
The distinction between stealing data for intelligence and tampering with an election is critical. According to the declassified documents, there is no evidence that China tampered with ballots or voter rolls, or even possessed the ability to do so. This aligns with the consensus among U.S. spy agencies that China did not attempt to tamper with election infrastructure in 2020.
Experts suggest the effort was aimed at collecting information on Americans for intelligence purposes rather than interfering with the voting process itself. Voter files, which are public records, can be obtained online or by request, making them prime targets for data collection without requiring a system breach.
This discrepancy has created political tension. President Trump has used the intelligence to push Senate Republicans for new requirements for voter ID and proof of citizenship. However, the lack of evidence for actual tampering has led to skepticism and frustration within the White House.
The situation is further complicated by ongoing legal battles. Faith Chybowski, a spokeswoman for Rhode Island’s secretary of state, pointed out the hypocrisy of the administration’s claims, noting that the Trump administration has unsuccessfully sued Rhode Island – as it has 29 other states – for its voter rolls, including confidential information.
While U.S. officials did not know why the Chinese hacker took the information, the memo said it could in theory
be used for future hacking or election influence,
the current evidence suggests the 2020 rolls remained intact, and the “hacks” were largely acquisitions of public information.
- Noida Police File Zero FIR Against Woman Over Anti-Modi Remarks
- Trump’s Endorsement of Darline Graham Sparks GOP Backlash in South Carolina
- Charlie Sheen Settles Dispute With Ex-Wife Brooke Mueller via Large Payment (newsy-today.com)
- The Senate Blue Slip, Explained: The Custom Trump Wants Gone (daybreakwire.com)
