He vice presidential debate between J. D. Vance y Tim Walzheld last night at the cadena CBSacquired relevance within the framework of a uncertain choice and highly polarized. The contenders, chosen by Donald Trump y Kamala Harris respectively, they faced each other to capture the decisive support of voters in the Midwest, a key region for the outcome of the elections. November elections.
Ohio Republican Senator Vance and Minnesota Governor Walz had a surprisingly “cordial” discussion on crucial issues such as foreign policy, the economy and immigration. Despite the civilized tone of the debate, both took the opportunity to criticize the leaders of their respective parties.
You might be interested: Israel threatens to respond to Iran’s missile attack
Both managed to express their positions clearly, but without surprises. The Ohio senator, who was criticized for lack of charisma in the campaign, exceeded expectations by appearing more natural and confident, while the Minnesota governor maintained his dialectical experience, although with a lower degree of closeness.
One of the first points of tension arose over the question about Iran, which has just launched missiles at Israel. Both defended Israel, but avoided committing to concrete action.
The Republican presented himself as a defender of fossil energy and blamed the current administration for allowing Iran to advance its nuclear program. For his part, the Democrat criticized Trump’s withdrawal from the nuclear deal and highlighted the Biden administration’s investments in clean energy.
Immigration was also a contentious issue, with the Hillbilly Elegy author defending the largest deportation in US history and blaming Biden for the crisis at the border. However, he avoided answering whether mass deportations would separate families, which Kamala Harris’ partner took advantage of to accuse Republicans of obstructing bipartisan solutions.
Regarding the economy, the conservative politician focused on the problems of inflation and the increase in the cost of living, while the Democrat defended the social policies of the current administration. Both made it clear that they were not attacking each other, but rather targeting their party leaders.
You might be interested in: “Technical problem” reported on Lula da Silva’s plane; would have circled over Edomex
Although the debate maintained a moderate tone, it was not without moments of tension, especially when addressing the issue of abortion and freedom of expression. The governor of Minnesota took the opportunity to emphasize his state’s progressive policies, while the Republican advocated letting each place decide, aware that the issues are complicated for Republicans.
The debate did not break traditional molds, but it allowed both candidates to present their visions and highlight their loyalty to their respective running mates. With the contest practically tied, this meeting could influence, although to a limited extent, the November results.
CSAS
Related
2024-10-05 07:23:03