Mlong range missilessupply F-16 houses y anti-aircraft systems. This is some of the military supplies and the arsenal brought by the allies and the Otan given to the Ukrainian army in almost three years ago invasion of Russia.
According to the criteria of
“If long-range missiles are sent from Ukraine towards Russian territory, it means that US military experts are working on these. We consider this a new stage of the Western war against Russia and we will react accordingly,” he declared. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia.
However, in the case of the Pentagon, this type of weaponry was allowed to be used in response to the deployment of US troops. North Korea to help Moscowwhich they see as direct interference by a third country in the conflict.
We will tell you what those “red lines” have been crossed since the invasion began in February 2022.
Here are the main Russian red lines that have fallen by the wayside:
Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin
Photo:
Share
Supply of rocket launch systems
In the first months of the war, the Ukrainian army had to defend itself due to the lack of modern heavy weapons. Russian troops advanced rapidly in the east and south of the country, and reached the outskirts of Kyiv.
The competition took a sharp turn in mid-2022 when rocket launcher systems were made available to kyiv Himarswhich made the Russian mechanized brigades an affordable target. The Ukrainians then regained control of the northeastern Kharkiv region and the Russians were forced to withdraw from northern Kherson.
Then, Moscow began to publicly deny the direct involvement of NATO countries, especially the United States, in the conflict.
Himars missile carrier
Which is in the Crimea
The Crimean peninsula, annexed by Russia in 2014, seemed untouchable in the early months of the war. Among these was the Crimean Bridgethe crown jewels of the area’s civil infrastructure, and the cornerstone of the Black Sea Fleet in the port of Sevastopol.
The highlight was the explosion at the Crimean Bridge in October, a successful Ukrainian military and propaganda operation that exposed the weakness of Russia’s rear guard.
The Crimean Bridge.
Photo:
Share
The arrival of the F-16 fighter
Aware of Russia’s superiority in the skies, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has consistently requested warplanes from his allies.. The West refused for many months to meet kyiv’s demands despite the damage done by Russian aviation to the country’s energy infrastructure.
In July 2023, the international coalition was finally established to train Ukrainian pilots and technical personnel in the operation of American-made F-16 fighters. The condition imposed by Washington was that kyiv would not use these aircraft on missions outside the national territory.
According to the Western press, the first units are already on the territory of Ukraine, although most of the more than a hundred devices promised by countries such as Belgium, Greece, Denmark, the Netherlands or Norway will not reach their heads destination until 2025.
These are the fighters announced by Poland for Ukraine.
Photo:
Raid on Kursk
kyiv surprised even its own allies with the invasion of Russia’s Kursk region last August, which some of the Ukrainian troops have been holding ever since without the Russian troops being able to expel them. This was the first invasion of Russian territory since Hitler’s forces invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941.
Russian experts and bloggers have sharply criticized the Kremlin for leaving the border unguarded – barely guarded by members of the Federal Security Service and conscripts – while using hundreds of thousands of volunteers to fight in the neighboring country.
Many experts in the West expected a ruthless reaction from the Kremlin, but the war continued without major changes. Indeed, kyiv has continued to hammer other border regions, forcing Moscow to evacuate thousands of people from their homes, including more than 120,000 in Kursk.
Banners in honor of Russian servicemen who took part in the Russian military action in Ukraine, in Kursk.
Photo:
Share
Use of ATACMS missiles
The Kremlin has warned the West for months that attacks by Ukraine against targets on Russian territory with ATACMS missiles would be seen as a point of no return in the confrontation between Russia and NATO.. The ATACMS has a range of up to 300 kilometers, so their radius of action allows Kyiv to hit military installations throughout Russia’s rear.
Although there was talk at first that the President of the United States, Joe Biden, restricted these attacks to Kursk, the first Ukrainian operation focused on an installation in the neighboring region of Bryansk on Tuesday.
The Kremlin’s reaction was measured, although Western embassies in Kyiv closed their doors on Wednesday because of the threat of a massive attack by the Russian army.
Putin, who warned in September that such a move would mean NATO and the United States are “at war with Russia,” threatened at the time to supply long-range weapons to Western enemies and this week approved doctrine nuclear which allows responses with atomic weapons to conventional attacks.
*With Eph
What are the potential consequences of increased military support for Ukraine from NATO and the U.S.?
Engaging Interview: Time.news Editor with Military Expert
Editor: Welcome to this special edition of Time.news. We’re joined today by Dr. Elena Petrov, a military strategist and expert in Eastern European geopolitics. Thank you for being here, Dr. Petrov.
Dr. Petrov: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such important developments.
Editor: Let’s dive right into the current situation. The provision of long-range missiles and F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine seems to mark a new phase in the conflict. How significant is this military support from the West?
Dr. Petrov: It’s pivotal. Long-range missiles enable Ukraine to target supply lines and military infrastructure deep within Russian-held territories. The F-16s will enhance their air capabilities, allowing for better defense against Russian air assaults. This shift indicates a commitment from NATO and the U.S. to support Ukraine more decisively.
Editor: The article mentions that Russia views this support as a crossing of their “red lines,” potentially escalating the conflict to a larger scale. What do you think this means for the Kremlin’s strategy?
Dr. Petrov: The Kremlin has always framed its security in these terms. When they perceive that their borders are threatened, especially with advanced weaponry that can reach their territory, they may feel compelled to respond aggressively. This could lead to a reevaluation of their military strategy, potentially increasing their reliance on tactical nuclear options, which is a serious escalation.
Editor: You also touched upon the public denial of NATO’s direct involvement from Moscow. How does this play into the narrative of the conflict?
Dr. Petrov: Denying NATO’s role allows Russia to save face domestically and internationally. It maintains the narrative that the conflict is a result of external aggression rather than acknowledging the extensive support Ukraine is receiving. This is crucial for rallying domestic support and justifying their military actions.
Editor: The article mentions Ukraine’s successful operations, like the raid in the Kursk region. What implications does that have for both Ukrainian morale and Russian strategy?
Dr. Petrov: The success in Kursk is monumental for Ukrainian morale. It reinforces belief in their military capabilities and strategic planning. For Russia, it raises questions about their border security and military readiness. Public criticism of the Kremlin’s failures, especially from military insiders, could pressure them to rethink their strategy and resources, affecting their future operations.
Editor: With the introduction of F-16s, there are conditions attached regarding their use outside Ukrainian territory. How critical is this stipulation, and what does it reveal about Western concerns?
Dr. Petrov: It shows the West’s desire to avoid direct confrontation with Russia. The condition emphasizes the need to support Ukraine while containing the risk of an escalation that could lead to a broader conflict. Western allies are navigating a delicate balance—supporting Ukraine’s defense while not provoking Russia to a point of no return.
Editor: as we look toward the future, what should we expect in terms of the military landscape in Ukraine and possible outcomes for the conflict?
Dr. Petrov: The military dynamics will increasingly rely on advanced technology and strategic planning, especially with the introduction of F-16s and long-range missiles. If Ukraine can sustain pressure on Russian forces and maintain support from NATO, we may see significant territorial gains. However, if Russia intensifies its tactics or escalates with nuclear options, we could enter a more dangerous phase of this conflict. Ultimately, diplomacy will be crucial in any resolution.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Petrov, for your insights. This conflict remains fluid, and your expertise sheds light on the complexities involved. We appreciate your time.
Dr. Petrov: Thank you for having me. Let’s hope for a peaceful resolution to this crisis.
