THE FIFA study the possibility of replace the Referee Assistance Video system (OUR) from a new tool called Football Video Support (FVS)a more simplified option and with the direct intervention of coaches in refereeing decisions.
Read also: Attention Boca, River and Lionel Messi: FIFA has confirmed when the 2025 Club World Cup draw will take place
Since its implementation, VAR has generated controversy around the world, with criticism of its effectiveness and in some cases the increased confusion instead of resolving disputes.
The controversy has reached such a point that, this year, the English Premier League even discussed the possibility remove the VAR of their competition due to the disagreements generated between players, coaches and fans.
Faced with growing dissatisfaction with technology, FIFA He is committed to FVS as a more accessible alternative with less interference. Unlike VAR, FVS will only prompt between four and five cameras for reviewing performanceseliminating the figure of the video referee.
Coaches can request at least two reviews per game
Furthermore, instead of the referee deciding when to review a play, the system will allow coaches require at least two reviews per match. However, if the review is unsuccessful, you will lose the opportunity to request another one.
VAR could go down in history (Photo: Reuters).
This new proposal also provides that the arbitrator will have the obligation to review the game when a coach requests itwhich marks an important difference with VAR, which allowed referees to use video on their own initiative.
FIFA hopes to gain approval from the International Football Association Board (IFAB) in the coming months to begin implementing FVS in international tournaments, with the possibility of widespread use from 2025.
The governing body of international football requests this measure reduce disputes generated by VARwhile giving coaches a more active role in match decisions, something that could change the landscape of refereeing in global football.
Interview between Time.news Editor and Football Technology Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we delve into the most pressing issues in sports today. I’m joined by Dr. Jenna Alvarez, a renowned expert in sports technology and officiating systems. Dr. Alvarez, thank you for being here.
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: Thank you for having me. Excited to discuss the future of officiating in football!
Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right in. FIFA is exploring a new tool called Football Video Support (FVS) to potentially replace the controversial VAR system. What prompted this move?
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: The decision stems from widespread dissatisfaction with VAR. Since its introduction, VAR has faced a lot of criticism regarding its effectiveness and the confusion it often brings rather than solving disputes. The debate has reached a point where some leagues, like the English Premier League, have considered removing VAR entirely. FIFA recognizes this dissatisfaction and is looking for alternatives.
Time.news Editor: So, FVS is designed to be a simpler solution. Can you explain what makes it different from VAR?
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: Absolutely. FVS aims to streamline the decision-making process. Unlike VAR, which relies on multiple camera angles and a video referee, FVS will utilize only four to five cameras to review plays. Plus, the video referee will be eliminated. This means that the technology is less intrusive and easier to implement during matches.
Time.news Editor: It sounds like one of the key aspects of FVS is that coaches can request reviews. How does that change the dynamics of the game?
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: This is a significant change. Coaches will be allowed to request at least two reviews per game, adding an interactive element to officiating. This could foster a collaborative approach between coaches and referees, ideally reducing frustration and conflict. It also places some of the authority back in the hands of coaches, who know their teams best.
Time.news Editor: Do you think this could lead to more transparency and trust in the officiating process?
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: That’s the hope! By allowing coaches to have a say in key decisions, FVS could foster a sense of involvement and accountability. If coaches feel they can intervene in officiating matters, it may lessen the tension that often arises from contentious calls. However, it will also hinge on how effectively this system is implemented and whether coaches use their reviews wisely.
Time.news Editor: Given the ongoing debates around technology in sports, what do you believe will be the biggest challenge in rolling out FVS?
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: One of the biggest challenges will be ensuring that coaches use their reviews judiciously. If they abuse the system, it could lead to further disruptions in the match flow. Additionally, educating everyone involved—from players to coaches to referees—about how FVS will work will be crucial in gaining buy-in. FIFA must ensure that FVS delivers clarity and fairness; if it doesn’t, we might see a repeat of the VAR controversies.
Time.news Editor: It seems like a remarkable shift in how football officiating is approached. What are your hopes for FVS as it moves forward?
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: I hope FVS can strike a balance between utilizing technology to improve the game while keeping it accessible and less complex than VAR. If FVS is successful, it could pave the way for more innovations in officiating across various sports. Ultimately, the goal is to enhance the integrity of the game and the experience for fans, players, and coaches alike.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Alvarez, for sharing your insights on this fascinating development. As this situation evolves, we’ll look out for how FVS is implemented and its impact on the game of football.
Dr. Jenna Alvarez: Thank you for having me! I’m looking forward to seeing how this unfolds.