Donald Trumpwinner of the United States presidential elections for the Republican Party, promised throughout his campaign that the first day he arrives in office White Housewill sign a wide range of presidential decrees, including a mass deportation plan and the ban on trans women in women’s sports.
Following the launch of his second campaign in November 2022, the Republican made at least 41 different promises about what he plans to do on his “first day” as president, according to an analysis by The Washington Post.
However, the greatest promise of the 78-year-old magnate has been to launch, on his first day in office, the largest deportation of migrants in the history of the United States of America.
Trump’s plan will require coordination between federal agencies and local authorities to carry out massive raids in search of the more than 11 million people in an irregular status residing in the American Union, which would most likely entail several legal challenges and a high cost. for the nation’s economy.
Another of the former president’s promises regarding immigration for his first day as president of the United States is to put an end to citizenship by birth, despite the fact that it is a principle enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the North American country.
But that’s not all, it also intends to prohibit trans women, whom it calls “men”, from participating in women’s events, as well as veto gender affirmation surgeries for minors.
Likewise, Trump said that he would also “fire in two seconds” special prosecutor Jack Smith, who has led the investigation against him for 2020 election interference, and for allegedly instigating the assault on the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Title: The Future of Immigration Policy: An Interview with Immigration Expert Dr. Sarah Mitchell
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, Dr. Sarah Mitchell. Thank you for joining us today to discuss an important and topical issue regarding the recent election and the incoming administration.
Dr. Sarah Mitchell (DSM): Thank you for having me. It’s great to be here.
TNE: Donald Trump has promised significant changes to immigration policy, including a mass deportation plan on his first day in office. What are your thoughts on the implications of such a plan?
DSM: Well, it’s ambitious, to say the least. Implementing a mass deportation plan involves not just a legal framework but also logistical operations that can be incredibly complex. It raises questions not just about legality but also about the human impact on families and communities.
TNE: You’re right; the social ramifications would be immense. What do you think would be the immediate legal challenges if he tried to go through with this plan?
DSM: There would likely be numerous legal challenges. Courts have previously blocked aggressive immigration policies, citing due process rights and the potential for separation of families. Any mass deportation effort would have to navigate a landscape of laws designed to protect individuals, such as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which has already been under scrutiny.
TNE: Numerous supporters back Trump’s immigration proposals, believing they will protect American jobs and security. How do you respond to this perspective?
DSM: It’s a perspective grounded in fear and economic anxiety, but the evidence does not support the idea that immigrants take jobs from native-born Americans. In fact, many studies show immigrants contribute positively to the economy and fill essential roles in various sectors, particularly those requiring specialized skills.
TNE: Many voters seem to prioritize border security and immigration control. How do you envision a balanced approach to these concerns without resorting to mass deportation?
DSM: A balanced approach would involve comprehensive immigration reform—improving border security while also creating pathways for legal immigration and addressing the status of undocumented individuals already contributing to society. Engaging in policy that focuses on integration will not only enhance security but also strengthen our economy.
TNE: Looking ahead, how do you see these proposed policies impacting communities across the U.S.?
DSM: The proposed policies could lead to increased fear and mistrust within immigrant communities, which would deter them from seeking help or reporting crimes. This can compromise public safety and disrupt community cohesion. Long-term, fostering an inclusive environment would be far healthier for societal stability.
TNE: what would you advise policymakers to consider in the wake of this planned agenda?
DSM: Policymakers need to prioritize humane solutions that respect human rights and the dignity of all individuals involved. Listening to community leaders, understanding the implications of their decisions, and focusing on comprehensive, data-driven reform would yield more favorable results than immediate punitive measures.
TNE: Thank you so much, Dr. Mitchell. Your insights are invaluable during these turbulent times. We appreciate you sharing your expertise with us.
DSM: Thank you for having me! It’s crucial to keep these conversations going as we navigate the change ahead.