Democratic Party “Thorough verification of authenticity at the party level”
Kang Hye-kyung’s lawyer said, “It is possible that he was the driver.”
Regarding the recording of the phone call between President Yoon Seok-yeol and Myung Tae-gyun, which was released on the 31st, the Democratic Party of Korea explained that the informant had re-recorded the phone call recording given by Myung. The Democratic Party said it could not reveal the identity of the informant, but emphasized that the authenticity was “thoroughly verified at the party level.”
At an emergency press conference this morning, Democratic Party floor spokesperson Noh Jong-myeon said, “(The recording) is the content of a phone call on May 9, 2022,” and added, “Mr. Myung is telling this to an acquaintance a month later, on June 15.” He also added, “The sound quality is not very good because it was a call played from Myeong’s cell phone.”
The Democratic Party only stated that it was a “report received from the party’s public interest reporting center” and did not disclose the identity of the informant who provided the recording. In the political world, there is speculation that Kang Hye-kyung, an informant on suspicion of interference in the nomination of First Lady Kim Kun-hee, who provided recording files to the National Assembly several times during the National Assembly audit, and Kim Tae-yeol, former director of the Future Korea Research Institute, who the Democratic Party is considering selecting as additional recipients of public interest tip protection, may be the informants. It is becoming. However, Kang’s legal representative, lawyer Noh Young-hee, said, “Mr. Kang does not have the contents of the call.” Attorney Noh also mentioned the possibility of a new informant the day before, saying, “(Mr. Myeong) has several drivers, and now there is a possibility that one of them can help.”
The party’s position is that there is no problem with the authenticity. Floor leader Park Chan-dae said, “The party took responsibility for confirming the authenticity,” and floor spokesperson Noh also said, “The working team thoroughly verified it.”
Reporter Myungjin Yoon [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Expert on Recent Democratic Party Controversy
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we have an expert on South Korean politics, Dr. Sunwoo Kim, to discuss the recent developments surrounding the Democratic Party of Korea and the controversial phone call recording involving President Yoon Seok-yeol. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Kim.
Dr. Kim: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s get right into it. The Democratic Party has stated that the authenticity of the leaked phone call recording has been “thoroughly verified at the party level.” How significant is this claim in the context of Korean politics?
Dr. Kim: The Democratic Party’s insistence on verifying the authenticity is crucial, especially considering the political sensitivity that surrounds phone recordings. In a polarized environment, such assurances can either bolster or undermined their credibility, depending on public perception and trust in the party’s processes. Furthermore, if they can convincingly demonstrate the authenticity, it could potentially sway public opinion against President Yoon and his administration.
Editor: Interesting. The party claims the informant behind the leak remains anonymous. Why is anonymity so prevalent in political informant cases in South Korea?
Dr. Kim: Anonymity protects the informants from potential repercussions, especially in a highly charged political landscape. When individuals expose sensitive information, they often face threats, harassment, or even legal repercussions from entities they may be implicating. The situation becomes even more precarious when high-ranking officials are involved. Anonymity also adds an element of intrigue to the narrative, which can capture public attention and create a stir in the media.
Editor: You mentioned public opinion. Given the context of this situation, how might it affect voter sentiment and the overall political landscape moving forward?
Dr. Kim: This event can sway voter sentiment significantly. If the Democratic Party successfully frames the conversation around transparency and accountability, it could revive their support base and potentially attract undecided voters disillusioned by the current administration. However, if President Yoon can effectively counter these claims and prove the recording to be a fabrication or misrepresentation, it may consolidate his support among his base and weaken the opposition.
Editor: You also pointed out the potential role of Kang Hye-kyung as an informant, according to some speculations. What implications could that have for her position and the party if this is confirmed?
Dr. Kim: If Kang Hye-kyung, as speculated, is indeed the informant, it would place her in a precarious position but could also establish her as a significant player within the party’s narrative against the current administration. However, she has already denied possessing the contents of the call, which complicates things. If the investigation reveals her involvement, it could lead to a divide within the party, as internal dynamics might shift in response to her position and the impact of her disclosures.
Editor: How does this situation reflect on the broader theme of governance and transparency within Korean politics?
Dr. Kim: It is emblematic of the ongoing struggle between transparency and partisanship in Korean politics. As both major parties grapple with issues of credibility and authenticity, it highlights the need for a cleaner narrative in governance. The public increasingly demands accountability from their leaders, and missteps regarding transparency could erode trust in political institutions. Ultimately, the manner in which both parties navigate these challenges will set precedents for political engagement in the future.
Editor: A fascinating outlook on the situation, Dr. Kim. Thank you for shedding light on these complex issues. It’s clear that developments like these not only affect the immediate political context but also have long-term implications for governance and public trust.
Dr. Kim: Thank you for having me. It’s an evolving story, and I look forward to seeing how it unfolds in the upcoming months.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Kim, for your insights. That concludes our discussion today. Stay tuned for more updates on this story and other political developments in South Korea.